I was expecting others to have more of these babies.
This is my 15mm F3.5 Minox B
I used to have one of those. I have no idea where is might be now. 
Try your tux breast pocket 
Bosskwok Member 153 posts Joined Mar 2004 More info | Jul 12, 2004 16:13 | #61 dn7elson wrote: Silvatooth wrote: I was expecting others to have more of these babies. This is my 15mm F3.5 Minox B I used to have one of those. I have no idea where is might be now.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dn7elson Senior Member 819 posts Joined Apr 2002 More info | Jul 12, 2004 16:16 | #62 Bosskwok wrote: Try your tux breast pocket ![]() Oh, my.....I donated the tux years ago
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bosskwok Member 153 posts Joined Mar 2004 More info | Jul 13, 2004 06:31 | #63 Ernemann Dresden Heag XI
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar f6.5 Does anybody know more about this camera?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW THREAD STARTER Canon Fanosapien 12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Jul 13, 2004 19:58 | #64 I don't know anything about it specifically, Bosskwok. It looks to be about late 1920's - early 1930's vintage based on the construction. It also appears to have some tilt/shift capabilities. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mvrekum Senior Member 274 posts Joined Jan 2004 Location: Netherlands More info | Jul 22, 2004 05:35 | #65 Bosskwok wrote: Does anybody know more about this camera? You can try this (http://www.photographica.nu/ www.martinvanrekum.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bosskwok Member 153 posts Joined Mar 2004 More info | Jul 22, 2004 06:29 | #66 mvrekum wrote: Bosskwok wrote: Does anybody know more about this camera? You can try this (http://www.photographica.nu/ Thanks for the life line!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowTechMan Member 120 posts Joined Dec 2002 More info | Jul 26, 2004 10:08 | #67 These were my Father's cameras. The Voigtlander traveled with him during WW2 in the US Navy on a destroyer escourt. This camera was well used and he took some fantastic pictures. I believe it still works. Circa 1930s??
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowTechMan Member 120 posts Joined Dec 2002 More info | Jul 26, 2004 13:44 | #68 Here are a few more from my collection. I don't know much about these, I either picked them up at rummage sales over the years or they were given to me.
The one below appears to me to be the oldest one in my collection. On the back it says. "Eastman Kodak Use Film 120" I can't see a model number or anything.
As you can see this one is tiny. It's called a "Baby Brownie," how appropriate.
The original Candid Camera below!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BallenPhoto Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 26, 2004 16:28 | #69 LowTechMan wrote: Here are a few more from my collection. I don't know much about these, I either picked them up at rummage sales over the years or they were given to me. The one below appears to me to be the oldest one in my collection. On the back it says. "Eastman Kodak Use Film 120" I can't see a model number or anything.
Hi Low tech man, I remember my grand parents actually using a camera like this one, and I'm old. Well, at least I feel old. The Captain and crew finally got their stuff together, now if we can only remember where we left it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowTechMan Member 120 posts Joined Dec 2002 More info | Jul 26, 2004 18:03 | #70 Hi Low tech man, I remember my grand parents actually using a camera like this one, and I'm old. Well, at least I feel old. The beauty of this one using 120 (Medium format) film, is you can still get film for it if you wanted to try it out. ..........Bruce Thanks Bruce, that's interesting. Any idea when those were made? Earlier in this thread you asked what format the Kodak 104 used. Excuse my ignorance here, but the negatives were tiny if that's what you mean, maybe 1/2in long. The film was in a plastic cartridge and it actually took pretty crappy pictures. BTW, think positive, say you feel young. I keep trying that, I'll let you know when it works.
No idea where I got this one. A Univex.
This Polaroid Land Camera is HUGE. Probably 10in high. Polaroid was also creative with their camera name. Where they afraid someone would think this is a Water camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowTechMan Member 120 posts Joined Dec 2002 More info | Jul 26, 2004 18:40 | #71 They must have made a ton of these, I ended up with two. Wind her up and let her roll!
Another Brownie!!!
This camera just plain looks cool!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BallenPhoto Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 26, 2004 21:26 | #72 LowTechMan wrote: Thanks Bruce, that's interesting. Any idea when those were made? Earlier in this thread you asked what format the Kodak 104 used. Excuse my ignorance here, but the negatives were tiny if that's what you mean, maybe 1/2in long. The film was in a plastic cartridge and it actually took pretty crappy pictures. When I saw them using this camera, it had to be early to mid sixties, so at a pinch I'd say the camera was probably made between the late fifties to early sixties. The Captain and crew finally got their stuff together, now if we can only remember where we left it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowTechMan Member 120 posts Joined Dec 2002 More info | Jul 29, 2004 19:14 | #73 Ok my last post here. I promise to stop spamming this thread.......... unless I find more cameras
Just some group photos below, cheers!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW THREAD STARTER Canon Fanosapien 12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Jul 29, 2004 19:32 | #74 LowTechMan - those are some very interesting cameras. I know that I've seen similar over the years, but all the old ones seem to be gone. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gixxerjasen Member 57 posts Joined Jun 2004 More info | Aug 04, 2004 08:23 | #75 Wow. All these immaculate well cared for clean cameras and here I am to post mine.
Handling this camera after shooting with my D70 I was suprised at how tiny and heavy this thing is. They sure don't build them like this one anymore and todays cameras wouldn't survive what this one has. On one hiking trip my dad had it and the camera strap came loose and the camera fell then proceeded to bounce off of several rocks down a 20 foot embankment. He climbed down to what he expected to be a pile of rubble only to find it still in working, although beat up, condition. We were able to finish the hike and got several good pictures from that very same camera later that day. Let's see the latest and greatest cameras do that!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1288 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||