Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 10 Jun 2007 (Sunday) 21:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Printing a 16x20- Help

 
britt777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,148 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Texas
     
Jun 10, 2007 21:57 |  #1

Hi all, I am trying to get a print in a 16x20. I need to know if I am supposed to let the lab color correct or not. I had a print done and didn't have them color correct and I thought the colors were more vivid on my home computer. The colors in the print I want done are very important. Also I noticed when I cropped to 16x20 the resolution was set to 146. Is this going to be enough to do a 16x20? The camera I use is a 20D so the file size is 3504x2336.

Thanks in advance
Brittany


Brittany
www.shutterprophotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Jun 10, 2007 23:01 |  #2

My lab provides me with an ICC profile to use. I apply this and then never let the lab do any further color corrections for me. To a large degree I think this is a personal decsioin.

I personally think that 146 sounds a bit low. The large prints that I have made I use the crop tool, input the appropriate size and I will keep the resolution on the high side. It has not failed me yet.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
britt777
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,148 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Texas
     
Jun 10, 2007 23:13 |  #3

ssim wrote in post #3356153 (external link)
My lab provides me with an ICC profile to use. I apply this and then never let the lab do any further color corrections for me. To a large degree I think this is a personal decsioin.

I personally think that 146 sounds a bit low. The large prints that I have made I use the crop tool, input the appropriate size and I will keep the resolution on the high side. It has not failed me yet.

PS automatically adjusted the res for me. I didn't think you could just change the resolution setting. The 146 I got was done automatically when I put in the size. Can you tell me how I should go about changing the resolution then?
Thank you


Brittany
www.shutterprophotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cmvscrapper
Member
46 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
     
Jun 11, 2007 05:34 as a reply to  @ britt777's post |  #4

I print through WHCC and the resolution they want you to use is 300...in most graphic programs, you can change this via the same place you would change the Image resize...Also, in your camera itself, you should check what you ahve your file size set at...the 20D can save anywhere from RAW to Large/Fine down to Small/Normal with several settings inbetween.


http://DesignsByChrist​ina.blogspot.com (external link)
http://www.NorthwoodSl​iceOfLife.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris_m_atl
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
     
Jun 11, 2007 05:50 |  #5

britt777 wrote in post #3356233 (external link)
PS automatically adjusted the res for me.

If you were using the crop tool, just clear out the resolution box as shown in the example below. As a result, Photoshop will not resample the image but leave the current resolution in the document when cropped.

As a general rule; 180dpi & up is sufficient for Newspaper prints, etc and 220dpi & up is best for magazines & higher quality printing. 300dpi is best for high quality photographic printing. To be safe, stick with 300dpi on any print unless filesize is an issue. For your needs, you'll want to resample your image for a quality print; unfortunately, quality may suffer a bit because Photoshop adds its own pixels when upsampling. You may need to use Unsharp Mask or other post processing to regain the crispness of your image if there's a substantial difference. The overall results of upsampling will be better for an enlargement because you won't have the ugly pixel blockiness associated with an undersampled, oversized image...hope that makes sense?

As far as the best way to effectively increase the size of an image, Eyecandy offers a brilliant plugin for Photoshop that does just that. You could download the free trial version and apply the effect to your image to see the results. If printing enlargements are a large part of your business, it may be a tool worth investing. http://www.eyecandy.co​m/blowup/index.html (external link)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


"Both optimists and pessimists contribute to our society. The optimist invents the airplane and the pessimist the parachute" --Gil Stern

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,072 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Printing a 16x20- Help
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2862 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.