Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 11 Jun 2007 (Monday) 09:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

DPP: raw ---> jpeg

 
niebyl2002
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 11, 2007 09:23 |  #1

Hi,

I need help.

Please let me know what I'm doing wrong. I already searched forum for answers. Found couple topics but it did not help me.

I'm shooting in RAW. Then using DPP deliver'd with my XTI I correct sharpness, a little bit contract and etc. Pictures looks great to me. They are sharp. So I process the batch and export them into jpeg's (I even tried tiff 16-bit no compression), high quality and the sharpness is gone.

Colors and everything looks ok (sRGB). I compared original raw with converted jpeg and there is noticable diffrence between them. Converted images are just not sharp.

I tried to convert same pictures in CS3 and same story.


Canon 50D | 17-40L f4 | 50 1.8 | 70-200L f4 - soon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yb98
Goldmember
Avatar
2,625 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Paris
     
Jun 11, 2007 10:19 |  #2

Compare at 100% view for sharpness.


Best DPP Threads
DPP++ Video Channel (external link)
New Version DPP++ 11.3 released (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
niebyl2002
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 12, 2007 14:04 as a reply to  @ yb98's post |  #3

I did and yes there is a difference.

What is the problem? Is it dpp?

I even start playing with converted jpeg. I tried to sharpen the image but nothing change. I slide the bar up to 100 and the picture looks still soft.


Canon 50D | 17-40L f4 | 50 1.8 | 70-200L f4 - soon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Jun 12, 2007 14:22 as a reply to  @ niebyl2002's post |  #4

What is the deference between the final printed product? If you print a RAW file directly and then the same image from a JPG is the softness evident?

If they are the same final quality, I am thinking that it might be a function of the program you are viewing the files in, and not the files themselves.

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philmar
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,834 posts
Gallery: 130 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 17958
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jun 12, 2007 14:42 |  #5

niebyl2002 wrote in post #3358165 (external link)
I compared original raw with converted jpeg and there is noticable diffrence between them. Converted images are just not sharp.

I tried to convert same pictures in CS3 and same story.

So are the RAWs sharper than the jpgs?
What are you using to view the comparison with? Zoombrowser? Picasa? Windows fax viewer? CS3?


A photo I took HERE published in National GeographicTime on your hands? Then HERE'S plenty more photos to nibble on (external link):
http://https …photos/phil_mar​ion/albums (external link)
or follow me: https://www.instagram.​com/instaphilmarion/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 12, 2007 19:12 |  #6

I once posted a screenshot here about some differences between DPP and PSCS2.
Sharpness wasn't one of the differences...
Here is another one...

What version of DPP?
What settings in the prefs?

Post a screenshot...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rhys
Dis-Membered
Avatar
5,351 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
Location: Columbia SC
     
Jun 12, 2007 19:46 |  #7

How compressed are your JPEGs?


Rhys

The empire conquers yet more galaxies:
www.sageworld.co.uk (external link)
www.sageworld.org (external link)
www.sagephotoworld.com (external link)
Blog: http://360.yahoo.com/t​hunderintheheavens (external link)

Free cheese comes only in mousetraps

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,164 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
DPP: raw ---> jpeg
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2861 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.