Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 26 May 2004 (Wednesday) 05:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

A Rising Sun(flower) - 50mm f/1.8 + Hoya CUL

 
slejhamer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,758 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2002
     
May 26, 2004 05:28 |  #1

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

http://www.pbase.com/i​mage/29398083 (external link)

Playing around with composition. Does it work?

50mm f/1.8 lens at f/22, Hoya +4 CUL, 2 second exposure, natural light (north-facing window.)

Selective soft-focus added in PS to diffuse the petals, but I kept the center sharp.

The bg is a photograph of flowers that I waved behind the sunflower to create a blurred effect.

Your comments appreciated.

Mitch

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shniks
Goldmember
Avatar
1,041 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
May 26, 2004 06:42 |  #2

Yes, it works, its beautiful. I particularly like the soft colours and the lighting. The background colour looks fantastic, but I dont like the fact that the blurred flowers look fake (even though they are a photo they look like a painting) - however I would not have noticed it if you didn't mention it. Overall - its gorgeous.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gsmx2
Senior Member
399 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2003
     
May 26, 2004 07:23 |  #3

It works for me very much.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick ­ barclay
Senior Member
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
     
May 26, 2004 07:43 |  #4

I like it. It really looks a lot less fake than much of the other stuff I see
posted here and on other forums. That pic has a lot of karma. Ommmmm.


You are cordially invited... (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
May 26, 2004 07:45 |  #5

The bg is a photograph of flowers that I waved behind the sunflower to create a blurred effect.

Very creative idea! I like it, and the pic a lot!
I've posted a lot of blurred pics in the last week or so, just to try to suggest that 'creative controls' may range from the usual needle sharp to not sharp at all.

I also like the way you didn't go overboard with the selective blur that you added in P$.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dn7elson
Senior Member
819 posts
Joined Apr 2002
     
May 26, 2004 09:25 |  #6

slejhamer wrote:
Playing around with composition. Does it work?

I go from liking it to being bothered by it :D

I love the lighting and color. It's a beautiful image.

What bothers me, and I'm not really sure why, is the lack of balance that seems to be perhaps an optical illusion of the stem alignment with the flower. The flower is cropped in such a way as to make the eye think that the center portion is much smaller than it is and thereby makes the stem look disjointed from the center of the flower. Then my mind sees the center of the center, but my eye won't go along ?! Also, the stem seems to lead the eye to a point at the very edge of, or just beyond the right side of the picture. I almost wish that the stem wasn't in the picture as a result.

Then again, maybe it's just me :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slejhamer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,758 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2002
     
May 27, 2004 13:26 |  #7

Shniks: thanks. There is a fairly famous photographer (I can't remember the name - obviously he's not too famous :D ) who does still life images of flowers using painted backgrounds almost exclusively. To some degree I was emulating what I remember seeing of his work, so I'll take your comment about the bg looking like a painting as a compliment. :wink:

gsmx2: thanks

rick: your karma ran over my dogma

PhotosGuy: thanks; i agree with you that sharpness isn't everything, and there is a place for "softness" too. Vadim ("msvadi" here on the forum) posts some very nice work with his soft focus lens.

dale: thanks for sharing your thoughts. I hadn't noticed it before, but can now see the slightly "disjointed" appearance that results from the crop and shooting angle. Hmmm, maybe a different shooting angle would help? An excuse to play around some more... :lol:


Mitch

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boomer1959
Goldmember
Avatar
1,757 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 236
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
     
May 29, 2004 22:56 |  #8

I realy like it. The soft focus is great :D


Nature and photography. Moments frozen a fraction of a second at a time.
Canon 1Ds MkIII and lots of other stuff.
Dave Klautt

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightHunter
Member
220 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Germany
     
May 30, 2004 04:01 |  #9

To me this is a nice picture with a very "compatibel" background. The composition is a bit unusual and then again not.

To my personal taste to much of the flower is missing and I believe a bit more of the flower on the right would not harm.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cropduster
Member
41 posts
Joined May 2004
     
May 30, 2004 10:25 |  #10

I really like the crop, saturation, focus and background. After looking at it several times now, I realize what bothers me. I wish the flower was "looking into" the frame instead of "looking out of" the frame.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slejhamer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,758 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2002
     
Jun 01, 2004 18:14 |  #11

Thanks Dave, LightHunter, CropDuster.

Crop, yes the edge tension caused the flower falling out of frame was intentional, part of my failed little "experiment." Obviously, it may not work for most people. :wink: Definitely a broken rule.
:D


Mitch

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,740 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
A Rising Sun(flower) - 50mm f/1.8 + Hoya CUL
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
998 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.