Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 Jun 2007 (Monday) 19:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lens Contact Cleaning

 
Bob ­ Charnier
Member
Avatar
114 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Hilliard, OH
     
Jun 11, 2007 19:53 |  #1

I've done a search and found articles on cleaning just about everything on the camera except the lens contacts. I've heard use alcohol and don't use alcohol, use a pencil eraser and don't ever use a pencil eraser. What do you all use??


Bob Charnier
Canon 5D & 20D, 16-35 f/2.8L, 17-85 f/4.0 IS,
24-70 f/2.8L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8USM Macro,
70-200 f/2.8L IS, 100-400 f/4.0L IS
Canon 1.4X Teleconverter, 580EX x 2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
folville
Goldmember
Avatar
1,022 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2006
Location: MN
     
Jun 11, 2007 19:56 |  #2

I used a pencil eraser once, and it seemed to work pretty well. I haven't had a lens error since then. What, out of curiosity, are the given reasons for not using either method?


135mm f/2.8 SF for sale

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jun 11, 2007 20:07 |  #3

NEVER use an abrasive such as a standard pink eraser on gold-plated contacts. A very soft white drafting eraser can be used lightly, but I don't even really advise that. The best thing to use is a liquid product designed for the purpose (such as the old Cramolin that I use), but a little 91% isopropyl alcohol on a lint-free cloth (damp, not wet) could also be used for most cleaning without problems.

This advice comes from 37 years of experience in the industrial control systems field.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Jun 11, 2007 20:12 |  #4

I've used both. I heard from members that Canon service center techs may recommend using the pencil eraser.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob ­ Charnier
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
114 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Hilliard, OH
     
Jun 11, 2007 20:17 |  #5

folville wrote in post #3361197 (external link)
I used a pencil eraser once, and it seemed to work pretty well. I haven't had a lens error since then. What, out of curiosity, are the given reasons for not using either method?

Something about some of the chemicals damaging the brass of the contacts.


Bob Charnier
Canon 5D & 20D, 16-35 f/2.8L, 17-85 f/4.0 IS,
24-70 f/2.8L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8USM Macro,
70-200 f/2.8L IS, 100-400 f/4.0L IS
Canon 1.4X Teleconverter, 580EX x 2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob ­ Charnier
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
114 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Hilliard, OH
     
Jun 11, 2007 20:18 |  #6

SkipD wrote in post #3361251 (external link)
NEVER use an abrasive such as a standard pink eraser on gold-plated contacts. A very soft white drafting eraser can be used lightly, but I don't even really advise that. The best thing to use is a liquid product designed for the purpose (such as the old Cramolin that I use), but a little 91% isopropyl alcohol on a lint-free cloth (damp, not wet) could also be used for most cleaning without problems.

This advice comes from 37 years of experience in the industrial control systems field.

Thanks Skip. I will try that and keep my fingers crossed!!


Bob Charnier
Canon 5D & 20D, 16-35 f/2.8L, 17-85 f/4.0 IS,
24-70 f/2.8L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8USM Macro,
70-200 f/2.8L IS, 100-400 f/4.0L IS
Canon 1.4X Teleconverter, 580EX x 2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Jun 11, 2007 21:11 |  #7

Bob Charnier wrote in post #3361320 (external link)
Something about some of the chemicals damaging the brass of the contacts.

The contacts can handle a quite a lot of chemicals. However, the surface coating on the lens is not guaranteed to like the chemicals.


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WMS
"Escargot on the Hoof"
Avatar
2,887 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jun 11, 2007 21:22 |  #8

There is a watch makers product called Rodico which is excellent for cleaning contacts. Any jewelers supply house should stock it.

WMS


I'm just a simple maker of love charms and tokens,who occasionally takes a picture or two.
Gear list: more toys than I need, Fewer than I want.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
folville
Goldmember
Avatar
1,022 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2006
Location: MN
     
Jun 11, 2007 22:16 |  #9

Tee Why wrote in post #3361280 (external link)
I've used both. I heard from members that Canon service center techs may recommend using the pencil eraser.


That's what I'm going off as well. I'd never have thought of that myself, but it makes sense. I suppose the logic is that the rubber will absorb any oils that may have gotten on the contacts. I wouldn't really consider a light erasing that abrasive..


135mm f/2.8 SF for sale

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Jun 11, 2007 23:57 |  #10

folville wrote in post #3361953 (external link)
That's what I'm going off as well. I'd never have thought of that myself, but it makes sense. I suppose the logic is that the rubber will absorb any oils that may have gotten on the contacts. I wouldn't really consider a light erasing that abrasive..

I've been in electronics for 30 years - you'd be surprised how abrasive a pink pencil eraser is. A soft, white drafting erasor plus isopropyle is what we used on precision electronics, and even then we only lightly rubbed the eraser across contacts, then cleaned up with the alcohol.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Jun 12, 2007 02:12 |  #11

Definitely go for a white soft eraser. If it damages a newspaper paper, it is too hard.


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,451 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Lens Contact Cleaning
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1100 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.