Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 27 May 2004 (Thursday) 10:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Shutter; how fast for moving objects for sharp pic?

 
dsze
Goldmember
Avatar
2,241 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
Location: On The Lake!
     
May 27, 2004 10:26 |  #1

Still testing my new 70-200 f4L; I shot my daughter yesterday on a rope swing and the photo is horrible. It is so blurry that it is useless. I don't think it was the lens. Here were my shot details:

shutter: 1/640
f4
ISO 100
focal length 200.

Sorry, I can't post the photo from here....but just looking at that metadata, was my shutter just too slow for a swinging child coming at me?

thanks,
daniel


-daniel
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
-Gear List-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
May 27, 2004 10:42 |  #2

Suggestion: Crank up your ISO as far as it will go, and then back off one notch. Now see what kind of exposure solution your camera will do in sports mode. The shutter speed should be significantly faster than what you were trying.

Also think about depth of field. If you are shooting your daughter on a rope swing, then either you are on the side or else in front. If you are in front, then she is swinging in and out of the optimal focus, so you have to widen the depth of field significantly (which means smaller aperture, which means slower shutter, which is not what you want). If you are shooting from the side, then she is swinging along a constant plane of focus (which means you can get by with a small aperture, which means a faster shutter, which is what you want).

On the other hand, if you are in front and she is swinging toward you, then her apparent motion blur will be behind her and not so visible, but then you are back into the quandry above.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boBquincy
Member
164 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2001
     
May 27, 2004 10:56 |  #3

Isn't it true that the fastest shutter speed is actually 1/200? This is shortest time at which the first curtain is fully open before the second curtain starts to close. If so, then any 'faster' shutter speed is really only a 'window' which moves acroos the focal plane, with the window being more narrow as the shuter speed is reduced.

This might cause blurring of an object that is moving quickly towards the camera, as different parts of the image would be exposed at different times (and in varying degrees of focus).

???

boB




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
May 27, 2004 11:33 |  #4

No, it does not cause blurring.

A focal plane shutter can go to 1/4000 on some cameras. No problem. No blur.

Don't be confused by the maximum sync speed for flash units, which is typically like 1/200. You can go faster than that, but only with a flash unit that supports high speed sync mode.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,241 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
Location: On The Lake!
     
May 27, 2004 11:33 |  #5

Hmm? Interesting question. I don't know if the fastest actual shutter speed is 1/200. I certainly would have thought that it was actually the speed that is available.


-daniel
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
-Gear List-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,241 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
Location: On The Lake!
     
May 27, 2004 11:35 |  #6

Yeah, Robert, that is what I would have thought. I know the flash sync with the built in flash on the rebel won't let the shutter go faster than 1/200


-daniel
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
-Gear List-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GenEOS
Senior Member
740 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Pearland, Texas
     
May 27, 2004 11:39 |  #7

A good rule of thumb for longer glass is 1/focal length to stop action.
Faster for faster subjects or to help freeze all motion.
In some situations cranking it up to 1/1000 to 1/1600 is possible.
Doing so not only stops action, but keeps camera shake from being an issue.
Depending on the usable max ISO setting of your camera, you can adjust the ISO setting faster to allow faster shutter speeds.
The fastest shutter speed comes into play when using a flash. The fastest shutter speed the flash will sync at is 1/200th. You can shoot at faster shutter speed with a flash in high speed sync mode, but usable distance is decreased for your flash.
The window theory would be true if the subject is moving towards you or away from you fast enough to move out of your focal field in the same time as the exposure. It would have to be moving extremely fast to move out of focus in say, 1/2000th of a second.


Daniel Tunstall
http://www.dmtphoto.co​m (external link)
Sports Shooter Member
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=2474 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
May 27, 2004 11:40 |  #8

1/640th..?

That's pretty fast... but if you double the ISO you can double that shutter speed to 1/1280 or so...

With a 200mm I usually need 1/250th or so to get people in motion.. if they aren't moving to fast that is :)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GenEOS
Senior Member
740 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Pearland, Texas
     
May 27, 2004 11:43 |  #9

dsze wrote:
Still testing my new 70-200 f4L; I shot my daughter yesterday on a rope swing and the photo is horrible. It is so blurry that it is useless. I don't think it was the lens. Here were my shot details:

shutter: 1/640
f4
ISO 100
focal length 200.

Sorry, I can't post the photo from here....but just looking at that metadata, was my shutter just too slow for a swinging child coming at me?

thanks,
daniel

I would also check where the focus point was in the shot. This could be a case of the focus point not being the child, but somewhere else in the image.


Daniel Tunstall
http://www.dmtphoto.co​m (external link)
Sports Shooter Member
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=2474 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
May 27, 2004 11:45 |  #10

A few weeks ago, a helicopter flew overhead, and I shot a photo using a 200mm lens. At 1/400 shutter, the main rotor was blurred. At 1/4000 shutter, it seemed to be frozen perfectly. But I had to crank up the ISO high to get an exposure solution, even in bright sunlight. It was far enough away that there was no depth of field issue, so I could shoot wide open.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,241 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
Location: On The Lake!
     
May 27, 2004 12:05 |  #11

Well, I its not an AF point problem. That is right where I intended it to be.

Is there a way to post photos on here...or do I have to provide a link to another website?


-daniel
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
-Gear List-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Biko
Senior Member
Avatar
639 posts
Joined May 2003
Location: Bradford England UK
     
May 27, 2004 12:22 |  #12

You need to upload pic to webspace then use insert image tags. You can use alt and p to insert them. the last one has to have a / in it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boBquincy
Member
164 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2001
     
May 27, 2004 12:39 |  #13

After some further research, it appears the *actual* shutter speed is pretty close to the flash sync speed. This is the fastest speed at which both shutter curtains are fully open, & the fastest speed at which the curtains travel across the focal plane.

The *effective* shutter speed is faster when the slit is narrower, up to 1/4000 and less. At fast shutter speeds each pixel gets only the selected time for exposure, but the *total* exposure time still takes about 1/200 second.

High speed sync flashes fire a burst of rapid pulses to allow each burst to expose a different area of the sensor as the curtain slit travels across (or down in some cases) the focal plane.

I would have to agree that the object would have to be moving towards the camera pretty quickly to affect the focus so the shutter speed is probably not the cause in this case.


boB




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,241 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
Location: On The Lake!
     
May 27, 2004 12:49 |  #14

not being able to upload the photo here. With the AF in the right spot, the shutter at what seems fast enough....I guess I have only to blame the new lens?

The other thought is that the DOF being set at f4 was just too shallow and she swung out of the DOF by the time I fully depressed the shutter release?


-daniel
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
-Gear List-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GenEOS
Senior Member
740 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Pearland, Texas
     
May 27, 2004 14:40 |  #15

dsze wrote:
not being able to upload the photo here. With the AF in the right spot, the shutter at what seems fast enough....I guess I have only to blame the new lens?

The other thought is that the DOF being set at f4 was just too shallow and she swung out of the DOF by the time I fully depressed the shutter release?

What probably did it was the lapse of time from your brain telling your finger to shoot and the shutter lag combined. It may have appeared in focus, but the actual shot was off.
You can put a link here to were you have the image posted.


Daniel Tunstall
http://www.dmtphoto.co​m (external link)
Sports Shooter Member
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=2474 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,660 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Shutter; how fast for moving objects for sharp pic?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1843 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.