Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 15 Jun 2007 (Friday) 03:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Just a thought.

 
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 15, 2007 03:54 |  #1

Having just sold my (most awesome) 1D Original, I find myself without a backup body to my 1D Mark II. I did, however, recently purchase a Nikon LS-2000 dedicated film scanner which produces approximately 10MP resolution scans.

How nuts would it be to grab an Elan 7N or similar to get a cheap when-desperate-only backup body and keep a few rolls of Superia in the bag with it? If push came to shove, I could grab the Elan then scan my developed negs and send those off to WHCC right along with the Mark II files. I would also get to use my L glass on some film for a change on the hobby side of things and/or if a client specifically requests film.

I'm just thinking $200 for a like-new Elan 7N (E-TTL II compatible, by the way) vs $500 for another 10D (been there done that), $650 for a 20D, $900 for another 30D (been there done that), or $2200 for another Mark II (got one already, but don't really have a strong desire to carry two).

I'm definitely not interested in a 5D or Mark III. Don't try to spend my money fellas, it ain't gonna work. I know how some of y'all are. ;) I just want to discuss the feasiblity/practicalit​y/insanity of grabbing a cheap film for backup (NOT for side-by-side shooting).


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaDProFF
Goldmember
Avatar
4,369 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: East Sussex, UK
     
Jun 15, 2007 04:09 |  #2

Depends how easy you can get the negs developed I suppose, if you cannot do them, and then how urgent you may need those pictures off the back up camera, could be critical, and lose you loads of money??????


Photographic Images on Brett Butler (external link) px500 (external link) & Flickr (external link) Some Canon Bodies , few blackish lenses, A dam heavy black one, couple dirty white ones, a 3 legged walking stick, a mono walking stick, and a bag full of rubbish :oops:
And Still Learning all walks of life, & most of all Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kennymc
Goldmember
Avatar
1,501 posts
Joined May 2003
Location: N.E coast of UK
     
Jun 15, 2007 05:13 as a reply to  @ MaDProFF's post |  #3

There should be no problem except the extra time it takes to scan all the negs...
Just get the films done develop only...


www.kennymc.com (external link)
Equipment http://kennymc.com/Inf​ormation/equipment.htm​l (external link)
http://www.kennymc.com​/equipment.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cathpah
Goldmember
Avatar
4,259 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Maine.
     
Jun 15, 2007 08:17 |  #4

cdifoto wrote in post #3380942 (external link)
Don't try to spend my money fellas, it ain't gonna work. I know how some of y'all are. ;) I just want to discuss the feasiblity/practicalit​y/insanity of grabbing a cheap film for backup (NOT for side-by-side shooting).

actually, if you think about the discounted cost of the 1d2n, it practically pays for itself! other reasons you should buy another dslr are......


:p:p:p:p


i think your film backup idea sounds like a great idea. a good way to stay involved with film, and you'll be one of the few people who can shoot 10mp velvia on here! (and no, fredmiranda's velvia photoshop action doesn't count) Such good deals on great film bodies, I'm tempted to do the same (somehow my fiancee won't let me get yet another body though.)


Architecture (external link) | Fashion + Beauty (external link) | Travel (external link) | Mayhem (external link) | Instagram (external link)
tools of the trade
My name is Jeff, and I'm addicted to shadows in fashion and brights in architecture. "Hiiiiii Jeff."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vic6string
Senior Member
607 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 15, 2007 08:22 |  #5

The only neg I can see is a psychological one. If you do end up using the film camera, invariably people are going to ask to see the pics instantly or they are going to see you changing film and at this point most people equate being a pro with having a nice digital SLR. They might think you aren't up with the times and this could have a negative impact on their perception of you. Of course, if anyone asks you can always say you keep a film camera with you for the times when you want a "classic feel" or something and they might just think you're the typical artsy type.


Rebel XTi, 430ex, Tammy 28-75, nifty fifty, kit lens, tons of reading, not enough practice, and two gorgeous subjects (my kiddies)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tsaraleksi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,653 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA
     
Jun 15, 2007 08:29 |  #6

I've been doing exactly this for a while now, until I can get a second digital body! I've never actually had to use it, but I know that it's there if need be. One negative I can think of is that the elans don't have much of a 'pro' feel so it may bug you to use it after you're familar with the 1D. I notice it between the Elan and the 20D, so I can only assume that it will be painfully obvious in your case.


--Alex Editorial Portfolio (external link)
|| Elan 7ne+BG ||5D mk. II ||1D mk. II N || EF 17-40 F4L ||EF 24-70 F2.8L||EF 35 1.4L || EF 85 1.2L ||EF 70-200 2.8L|| EF 300 4L IS[on loan]| |Speedlite 580EX || Nikon Coolscan IV ED||

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Jun 15, 2007 09:19 |  #7

I think it's a fine idea. I kept my EOS 3 around just for that reason, and even though I know have a couple of backup bodies, I'm not selling it. Film is still a wonderful media, and if you can get the neg scan process flow down pat (mimimal dust and scratches retouching needed), then it should work for you.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oldsquawk
Member
246 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 15, 2007 09:28 |  #8

I have a Nikon LS-2000 film scanner from my old film days. Scans from color negatives do not look as good as scans from transparencies and scanned film just doesn't look as good as original digital files. Film scans from the LS-2000 are noisy compared to digital and lack the dynamic range of an original digital file. You can get better looking digital files from a Rebel XTi than the files from a film scanner.


oldsquawk

Canon EOS 40D, Canon EOS 20D, Canon EF 500mm f 4L IS, Canon EF 300mm f 4L IS, Canon EF 70-200mm f 4L IS, Canon EF 100mm f 2.8 macro, Canon EF 17-40 f 4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blue_max
Goldmember
Avatar
2,622 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: London UK
     
Jun 15, 2007 09:32 as a reply to  @ Mark_Cohran's post |  #9

Scanning is a real boring drag. I spent eighteen months scanning trannies in on my desktop drum scanner and spotting out in photoshop and it nearly sent me insane. Just thinking of a title for each one makes my head hurt.

And film goes off after a while.

I am not sure I would trust a camera that wasn't used much. It may become lazy and you wouldn't even know until you got the negs back. I would get a second hand digital if I was you.

Nostalgia is a dangerous thing. Things always seem better in the old days, but were they?

Graham


.
Lamb dressed as mutton.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
Avatar
4,861 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jun 15, 2007 11:03 |  #10

Well, I'm not going to advise you about having a film SLR to back up your DSLR. As you can see from my sig I have a film camera, but I either go out in the field with film or digital, not both. Currently, I have not felt the need for a DSLR backup, I have a decent P&S if push comes to shove (a G5, which I am dearly fond of). Unless the EOS gods decide to make sport of me I should have a 1D3 by Summer's end. I will be keeping my 20D anyway. I also have a film scanner and have spent many, many hours scanning the thousands of slides I have from my old film only days. I use more Kodachrome 64 than any other film and since there is only one place, Dwayne's Photo in Kansas, that is the only Kodak certified processor of Kodachrome film in the U.S. that is where I send it. They will scan a roll for $4.00 and send a CD with 15MB files. All total it costs me $17.50 to have a 36 exp roll of film processed, mounted in 2"x2" slides, the roll scanned to a CD and return postage. I shoot one hell of a lot more digital than film, but, I have never been able to get a digital photo with that 'Kodachrome look'.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jun 15, 2007 11:51 |  #11

Save us all the intermediate threads and just skip to the part where you get the 5D :)


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_48
Goldmember
Avatar
2,068 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Brookfield, MA
     
Jun 15, 2007 11:51 as a reply to  @ post 3382098 |  #12

Don,
I've actually got 2 Elan 7's, one bought new from B&H and the second was picked up from KEH used. Although I never had to use them, they were backups for a couple of weddings I did a while back. They do get occasional use even though a majority of what I shoot is now digital. Also the Elan's are FF so you get the benefit of a wide lens being truly wide. I have a 35mm film scanner also, Nikon Coolscan V ED, which does an OK job on negs and slides. And for MF film and transparencies, a Canon flatbed 9950F which doesn't do too badly. Problem I found with scanning is the negs/slides have to be meticulously clean and if you're into doing alot of scanning this can get a bit tedious.
If you had to use a film camera for backup, why would you scan the negatives to send digital files into WHCC? Don't they take film for processing and prints as well?

The Elan7 will also fit up with a grip/battery holder from KEH at resonable $$.


Megapixels and high ISO are a digital photographers heroin. Once you have a little, you just want more and more. It doesn't stop until your bank account is run dry.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 15, 2007 11:59 |  #13

Thanks for your input so far everyone. Recent developments (read: car problems) are probably going to force me into a film body anyway since my 1D sales cash is apparently being spent on that. Life. :rolleyes:

I'm just thinking; "Have something! Anything!" A $200 camera body and 6 rolls of film would be ok. Not ideal of course, but when a 1D II with 6K clicks on it fails, things aren't going swell in the first place.

Since an Elan *kind of* fits in with the 20D/30D line, I don't think it would be too much of a problem. Command wheel and E-TTL II is still there so I'm good. :cool: I wouldn't be too elitist to use it.

Mark_48 wrote in post #3382658 (external link)
Don,
I've actually got 2 Elan 7's, one bought new from B&H and the second was picked up from KEH used. Although I never had to use them, they were backups for a couple of weddings I did a while back. They do get occasional use even though a majority of what I shoot is now digital. Also the Elan's are FF so you get the benefit of a wide lens being truly wide. I have a 35mm film scanner also, Nikon Coolscan V ED, which does an OK job on negs and slides. And for MF film and transparencies, a Canon flatbed 9950F which doesn't do too badly. Problem I found with scanning is the negs/slides have to be meticulously clean and if you're into doing alot of scanning this can get a bit tedious.
If you had to use a film camera for backup, why would you scan the negatives to send digital files into WHCC? Don't they take film for processing and prints as well?

The Elan7 will also fit up with a grip/battery holder from KEH at resonable $$.

I would send scanned files to WHCC because they're an all-digital lab. It would surely slow down my workflow but we're not talking about doing this every gig either.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 15, 2007 12:18 |  #14

cdifoto wrote in post #3380942 (external link)
Having just sold my (most awesome) 1D Original, I find myself without a backup body to my 1D Mark II. I did, however, recently purchase a Nikon LS-2000 dedicated film scanner which produces approximately 10MP resolution scans.

How nuts would it be to grab an Elan 7N or similar to get a cheap when-desperate-only backup body and keep a few rolls of Superia in the bag with it? If push came to shove, I could grab the Elan then scan my developed negs and send those off to WHCC right along with the Mark II files. I would also get to use my L glass on some film for a change on the hobby side of things and/or if a client specifically requests film.

I'm just thinking $200 for a like-new Elan 7N (E-TTL II compatible, by the way) vs $500 for another 10D (been there done that), $650 for a 20D, $900 for another 30D (been there done that), or $2200 for another Mark II (got one already, but don't really have a strong desire to carry two).

I'm definitely not interested in a 5D or Mark III. Don't try to spend my money fellas, it ain't gonna work. I know how some of y'all are. ;) I just want to discuss the feasiblity/practicalit​y/insanity of grabbing a cheap film for backup (NOT for side-by-side shooting).

Just don't get caught chimping the back of the Elan 7N (and guaranteed, you will). You'll never live it down if someone posts a shot of you chimping a film camera. :lol:


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 15, 2007 12:33 |  #15

PacAce wrote in post #3382799 (external link)
Just don't get caught chimping the back of the Elan 7N (and guaranteed, you will). You'll never live it down if someone posts a shot of you chimping a film camera. :lol:

Tumak wrote in post #3382814 (external link)
I did that the other day. I run a roll thru occasionaly to keep the shutter working. Also stared at the back to change CF to trailing shutter. Couldn't remember for a minute how to get to it, then almost changed the wrong thing.

Hah. I've already tried to chimp my old Spotmatic. And it doesn't even remotely resemble a modern camera. Thankfully I was alone. :oops:

On a slightly different spin, I remember first seeing the Digital Rebel/300D in stores. I thought to myself "ooo they put review screens on the film cameras! Awesome!" :lol:


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,339 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
Just a thought.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2849 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.