Is this pattern that I see at high image magnification, which looks almost like reticulation, the result of a dirty sensor on the 20D?
This example is a 200% crop with some over sharpening to show the detail. Thanks for your help.
Pinto Always in our hearts and minds. R.I.P. More info | Jun 15, 2007 23:03 | #1 Is this pattern that I see at high image magnification, which looks almost like reticulation, the result of a dirty sensor on the 20D?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Jun 15, 2007 23:07 | #2 Best way is to focus to infinity, aim at a blue sky, set at f/22 and shoot while moving the camera in a circle. The only things left in focus at that point is junk on the filter covering the sensor. I don't think you are not going to see sensor dust at F/4. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_Cohran Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 15, 2007 23:10 | #3 That doesn't look like dust on the sensor. I'm not sure what it is, but sensor dust would look like irregular shadows in the image. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 "spouting off stupid things" 57,716 posts Likes: 4035 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Jun 15, 2007 23:10 | #4 Hard to tell. Try this instead: Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 15, 2007 23:12 | #5 Thanks for your response. I'm aware of looking for dust with the method you describe above. But I'm interested in knowing what this noise-like pattern is that I'm seeing on my images.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Jun 15, 2007 23:17 | #6 What is the original picture, and what are you zoomed on? Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 15, 2007 23:33 | #8 Let me correct that to, "my images are showing this lately."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GlennNK Goldmember 4,630 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Victoria, BC More info | Jun 16, 2007 00:24 | #9 Those are really interesting patterns; have you been doing closeups/macros of plants lately. A lot? When did voluptuous become voluminous?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jra Cream of the Crop 6,568 posts Likes: 35 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Ohio More info | Jun 16, 2007 08:55 | #10 Maybe I'm missing something but the pic looks normal to me. I do see a little digital noise in the photo (normal for ISO 400) but not enough to even worry about IMO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tyreman Goldmember 1,085 posts Likes: 9 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Cambridge,Ontario,Canada More info | I don't think I see sensor dust. Cambridge, ON.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MichaelSingleton Member 118 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Malvern, England More info | Jun 16, 2007 11:43 | #12 Just looks like a combination of noise and sharpening to me! Nothing really wrong there.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 16, 2007 11:51 | #13 Thanks for your responses. I'll post some other examples of images later today. Yes, Glen NK, I do love the 24-105.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 913 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||