Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 29 May 2004 (Saturday) 06:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

50mm f1.8 killed my DRebel????

 
hiaw
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Oct 2003
     
May 29, 2004 06:23 |  #1

I do not know what happened to my DRebel today. I chuck on the 50mm f1.8 to take pictures. Put it in Av mode, set up on a tripod and press the button.

Result? Horribily overexposed photos!!!! I think it must be 3 stop over exposed. :shock:

So logically, I put on the kit lens and shot in the same mode and check that the exposure is exactly the same. and the photo turns out perfectly exposed..... :shock: ?!

Something very weird is happening and I could not understand why. I thought the lens is just letting the light in and the camera take the metering reading and the CMOS record the image. Why is that with the same exposure setting, the 50mm give me 3 stop overexposure, whereas the kit lens is perfectly exposed? ?

Did anyone have similar experience? This really feel metaphysical to me. I think I should call the Voodoo master at Canon New Zealand on monday to find a cure for it. :evil:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maderito
Goldmember
Avatar
1,336 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: Southern New England
     
May 29, 2004 06:33 |  #2

Try this supernatural trick:

Address the camera properly.
Slap on the 50/1.8
While in Av mode, dial in an aperture of 8.0 (it's probably 1.8 now).
Pray.
Snap your picture.
Report back.


Woody Lee
http://pbase.com/mader​ito (external link)
http://maderito.fotki.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichardtheSane
Goldmember
Avatar
3,011 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Nottingham UK
     
May 29, 2004 06:34 |  #3

Is the 50mm F1.8 stopping down correctly when you actually take the shot?

It could be that the lens aperture is not working correctly so all the shots are being taken at F1.8 regardless of what the camera tell it....

Experiment with that idea, it seems most likely at the moment...


If in doubt, I shut up...

Gear: 40D, 12-24mm AT-X Pro, 17-85mm, Sigma 150mm Macro Sigma 100-300 F4, 550EX, other stuff that probably helps me on my way.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BDM
Senior Member
414 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Near Toledo, Ohio
     
May 29, 2004 08:21 |  #4

As someone else has already suggested, it sound like the lens may not be stopping down correctly . . possibly remaining wide open. Try this. Look into the lens and release the shutter in bright surroundings. You may be able to notice whether the iris closes down. You could also set it on manual, pick a shutter speed and adjust the aperature until correct exposure is indicated. Take a shot. If it is over exposed, run the shutter up one click in speed. Take another shot. If the exposure is still over, do it again at another, higher click in shutter speed. At some point, you should achieve correct exposure. How far up you had to adjust the shutter speed from the indicated, correct exposure should give you an idea as to how far off the lens may be. Each higher click on the shutter speed represents one a one stop adjustment.

If the above shows a malfunction, it's time to send it in for service.

Bruce




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
May 29, 2004 08:37 |  #5

So the Canon 1.8/50 'killed' your DRebel, right? :roll:

From another thread...Read that before you post a question on this here or any forum

Kadath wrote:
How to ask questions the helpful way, by ESR:

http://www.catb.org …faqs/smart-questions.html (external link)

If there were a drivers license for the internet, this would be required reading. =)

Kad

nothing more to add...

Best regards,
Andy

PS: BTW, welcome to the forum! 8)


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,925 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
May 29, 2004 08:43 |  #6

Andythaler wrote:
So the Canon 1.8/50 'killed' your DRebel, right? :roll:

From another thread...Read that before you post a question on this here or any forum

Kadath wrote:
How to ask questions the helpful way, by ESR:

http://www.catb.org …faqs/smart-questions.html (external link)

If there were a drivers license for the internet, this would be required reading. =)

Kad



nothing more to add...

Best regards,
Andy

PS: BTW, welcome to the forum! 8)

Um... I don't see who in there right mind expects anyone to read a 6 billion word diatribe on how to ask a question ? ?!

The original post in this thread seems descriptive enough. And it also seems that the answer was provided quickly enough (at least the likely cause)

Again. the actual rule that applies to use of THIS forum is simple.

If you don't feel like taking the tme to help.. don't post.

Thanks.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
May 29, 2004 08:50 |  #7

CyberDyneSystems wrote:
Um... I don't see who in there right mind expects anyone to read a 6 billion word diatribe on how to ask a question ? ?!

Hmmm. I did. But then, I might not fit into the group you mentioned :lol:

Again. the actual rule that applies to use of THIS forum is simple.

If you don't feel like taking the tme to help.. don't post.

Thanks.

The point that occured to me is that there *will* be people who read the thread (or maybe don't bother to read it) that will actually believe that the lens 'killed' the camera.

Maybe I overreacted ... so Hiaw, I'd like to apologize if I insulted you ... that was not my intention.

As redemption :twisted: ... a possible logical explanation would be that the settings you used (e.g. f/1.8 on a sunny day with high ISO value) resulted in a shutter speed that's too fast for the DRebel (e.g. 1/8000). (Happened to me sometimes on my G2 after setting the ISO to 400 and forgetting to set it back)

The picture would come out overdeveloped on the 1.8/50, but not on the kit lens.

But to judge that you would have to post the shot and the EXIF information.

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
May 29, 2004 09:19 |  #8

BDM wrote:
As someone else has already suggested, it sound like the lens may not be stopping down correctly . . possibly remaining wide open. Try this. Look into the lens and release the shutter in bright surroundings. You may be able to notice whether the iris closes down.

You could do this by pushing the depth of field preview button.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,925 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
May 29, 2004 10:02 |  #9

:lol: :lol:

O-kay.. now that I have reprimanded poor andy.. :P

The shoe is definately on the other foot!

All theories above are plausible.. but Andy's is "the best" in a way because it would mean there is nothing wrong with any of the hardware...

So.. the shoe is on the other foot.. for us to help any further.. we do need the exif info at least.. and the image itself would be helpfull as well..

I'm guesing that if I had read the other 5,999,999,823 words in that link Andy provided.. it may have mentioned the need for the exif.... :roll: :oops:


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BDM
Senior Member
414 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Near Toledo, Ohio
     
May 29, 2004 10:52 |  #10

robertwgross wrote:
BDM wrote:
As someone else has already suggested, it sound like the lens may not be stopping down correctly . . possibly remaining wide open. Try this. Look into the lens and release the shutter in bright surroundings. You may be able to notice whether the iris closes down.

You could do this by pushing the depth of field preview button.

---Bob Gross---

Bob, I thought of that but I have had instances where the depth of field button does cause the lens to stop down but when it is used for an actual exposure it does not stop down fast enough and over exposure results. That has generally happened with older lenses whose lubricants have thickened but because of that experience I thought it best to recommend a test "at speed" so to speak. Of course, if the iris doesn't close even with the depth of field button there is a very obvious problem.

Bruce




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jyrgen
Senior Member
Avatar
259 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Estonia
     
May 29, 2004 11:29 |  #11

No wonder. After all, as many have reported, it's a killer lens :D


Canon 35/1.4 | Canon 50/1.4 | Canon 135/2 | Canon 17-40/4 | Canon 24-105/4 | Canon 70-300/4.5-5.6
Canon 5D | Canon Speedlite 430EX | Manfrotto 055 ProB + 488RC2 | Kenko ext tubes & 1.4x TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
May 29, 2004 14:18 |  #12

BDM wrote:
Bob, I thought of that but I have had instances where the depth of field button does cause the lens to stop down but when it is used for an actual exposure it does not stop down fast enough and over exposure results. That has generally happened with older lenses whose lubricants have thickened but because of that experience I thought it best to recommend a test "at speed" so to speak. Of course, if the iris doesn't close even with the depth of field button there is a very obvious problem.

In my experience, about the only time that the depth of field preview button doesn't do anything is if my exposure solution dictates the lens to be wide open.

If you think that the iris is "sluggish" due to too much or too little lubricant, then I guess you don't have much choice except to have the lens serviced. I've only seen that sluggishness on a very old lens at very cold tempertures.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IndyJeff
Goldmember
Avatar
1,892 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Oct 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     
May 29, 2004 15:17 |  #13

Hiaw just out of curiosity what ISO were you shooting?


On shooting sports...If you see it happen then you didn't get it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ijohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,646 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Whiteriver, AZ
     
May 29, 2004 20:12 |  #14

I read a post somewhere else that especially in good sunlight, the 1.x's can be unuseable wide open (esp the 1.0). Wait till the sun goes down and try again or, as mentioned, try f8.


www.trickoflight.net (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/i​tj12345 (external link)
Original 5D still ROCKS!!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
May 30, 2004 09:05 |  #15

ijohnson wrote:
I read a post somewhere else that especially in good sunlight, the 1.x's can be unuseable wide open (esp the 1.0). Wait till the sun goes down and try again or, as mentioned, try f8.

Well, you can reach a point where you cannot achieve a fast-enough shutter to expose properly with such a large aperture. Its not a problem with the lens - its a problem with too much light to get good exposure at f/1.4 or 1.8.

If you're seeking to use wide apertures for the background blur effect, you may have to use a neutral density filter to cut down the amount of light entering the camera. These filters are effective in reducing light without adding any color cast to the image. I'm getting one soon for just that purpose.


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,538 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
50mm f1.8 killed my DRebel????
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1790 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.