Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 17 Jun 2007 (Sunday) 22:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why is my picture overexposed?

 
Undiscovered
Member
97 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Jun 17, 2007 22:44 |  #1

Setup: Canon XT, 28-70mm, w/ tripod.

I was at a local nature trail and tried to slow the shutter speed to capture waterfalls in a cotton appearance. I've done it successfully once before using 0.3" (different waterfall however), but this time the picture looked over exposed regardless. Why couldn't I obtain a more cotton affect?

This is the picture, and below are the specs
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/8250417@N03/543​144590/ (external link)

Tv(Shutter Speed)
0.3Sec.
Av(Aperture Value)
F22
Metering Modes
Centerweighted average metering
Exposure Compensation
0
ISO Speed
100
Lens
28-70mm
Focal Length
28.0 mm
Image size
3456 x 2304
Image Quality
RAW
Flash
Off
White Balance
Cloudy
AF mode
One-Shot AF


Here is the second take with a faster shutter speed, but it's still not the cotton look I was looking for, but it looks better.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/8250417@N03/543​266189/ (external link)

Tv(Shutter Speed)
1/25Sec.
Av(Aperture Value)
F22
Metering Modes
Centerweighted average metering
Exposure Compensation
0
ISO Speed
100
Lens
28-70mm
Focal Length
28.0 mm
Image size
3456 x 2304
Image Quality
RAW
Flash
Off
White Balance
Cloudy
AF mode
One-Shot AF




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidcrebelxt
Goldmember
Avatar
3,016 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Missouri, USA
     
Jun 17, 2007 22:56 |  #2

One possibility was the scene may have been too bright for a slower-shutter speed. Once you've closed down the aperture all the way (higher f-stop) and lowered your ISO (100) as you did... the only other ways to get slower shutter speed in some scenes is by using a polarizer to drop by another f-stop or so... or you'd need to use Neutral density filters to block the overall amount of light entering your lens.


David C.
Equipment: Canon Dig. Rebel XT; 18-55mm EF-S; 28-105mm EF; 50mm 1.8 EF
Sigma ef-500 DG ST, Elements, Gimp, Lightroom
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/dcrebelxt (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notsotechie
Member
Avatar
241 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Calgary,Alberta,Canada
     
Jun 17, 2007 23:13 |  #3

As for the first photo the shutter speed is a bit too long.
aecond one it bit of an improvement should have gone a litttle more higher shutter speed.say about 1/100 to1/ 250 sec
first of all I think part of the problem is based on the white balance is in cloudy mode.
if you have DPP reload the picture and see if you can change the white balance mode.
say to landscape? and mabye do a few more tweaks.
give it a try
If you have DPP version 3 then it would be great. or what ever program you use for PP
other wise maybe invest in some good ND filter set.
wait for other to give there input.


:) Canon Rebel XTi and bag full of goodies.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Jun 17, 2007 23:13 |  #4

Sunshine is too bright for 0.3 seconds and f/22. 1/50 and f/22 would be about right for full sun. Your lens simply couldn't stop down enough to avoid overexposure with a shutter speed that long. If you used Tv mode, the aperture value in the viewfinder would have been blinking. It's important to keep an eye on that.

A polarizer would give you maybe a couple stops and allow perhaps 1/12. To get slower shutter speeds in sunshine you'll need a neutral density filter of more than 2 stops.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jt168
Member
Avatar
124 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jun 17, 2007 23:38 |  #5

Or trying early in the morning or late in the afternoon when it's not as bright...


My Blog - JAY TSAI photography (external link)
Canon 30D | Canon 40D | Canon 5D | 10-22 EF-S | 17-55 IS F/2.8 EF-S | 24-70L F/2.8 | 70-200L IS F/2.8 | 100 Macro | 85 F/1.8 | 50 F/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Undiscovered
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
97 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Jun 18, 2007 00:15 |  #6

Thanks guys.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snyper77
Senior Member
Avatar
660 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Rainbow City, AL
     
Jun 19, 2007 16:25 |  #7

I don't see what "mode" you were shooting in. If you were in M mode, then you simply didn't watch your meter and/or get your shutter/ap. settings correctly. Now, if you were in Av mode..... or Tv mode.... and you got an overexposed image, then possibly when the camera 'grabbed' the other half of the exposure (av or ap), then it could have been maxed out and blinking at you, telling you there was a problem......but was un-noticed.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,919 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Why is my picture overexposed?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2742 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.