Crazy Skies -- Critique Corner in photography-on-the.net forums

Senior Member

728 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Guelph, ON

More info

May 29, 2004 20:02 | #1

Here are two crazy Skies that I took from my home town. Let me know if the watermark is too obtrusive, I am trying different things out to see what I like best for 'web preview' images for my upcoming website. I can post non-watermarked versions if necessary.

Also if you have good advice/ideas for watermarking images that you post on the web I would be happy to hear about them.

Props to LightHunter for the Signature and Frame advise.

Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

2003:08:04 08:19:57
7.2-28.8mm @ 28.8mm
Subject dist: 36m
1/320 sec, f/5.6
Mode: Landscape
Metering: Evaluative
ISO: Auto
AF mode: Single AF
Drive: Single frame shooting
White balance: Auto
Flash: Off
File size: 612KB
Image size: 2272 x 1704

Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

2004:04:11 06:48:57
7.2-28.8mm @ 7.2mm
Subject dist: 66m
1/1250 sec, f/5
Mode: Auto
Metering: Evaluative
ISO: Auto
AF mode: Continuous AF
Drive: Single frame shooting
White balance: Auto
Flash: Off
File size: 707KB
Image size: 2272 x 1704

Thanks for your criticism,
Vince

Glass and plastic

LIKES 0

rick barclay

Senior Member

733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004

More info

May 30, 2004 05:40 | #2

They're both great, but your wm defintiely kills them both, IMO. Watermarks
are like children--to be seen but not heard.

You are cordially invited...

LIKES 0

LightHunter

Member

220 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Germany

More info

May 30, 2004 07:22 | #3

I prefer the 2nd.
The WM are too much but they do serve their purpose, make your images unusable.
It's nice to see you like the signature version I made for you :wink:

LIKES 0

vfilby
THREAD STARTER

Senior Member

728 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Guelph, ON

More info

May 30, 2004 07:30 | #4

Here is another version of the watermark, it is much less obtrusive. Is this better?

Should I even bother adding a watermark to images that I post to the web? All the images I would be posting will be approximately 800x600 or less.

Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Thanks,
Vince

Glass and plastic

LIKES 0

Jump to forum... • Rules • Forums • New posts • RTAT • 'Best of' • Gallery • Gear • Reviews • Member list • Polls • Image rules • Search • Password reset • Home

Not a member yet?

Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

THEME: Paper White | Darker
MARGINS: (this page: defaults)

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1293 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.

	x 1600
	y 1600