Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 30 May 2004 (Sunday) 10:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New 70-200 f4L Wakeboard Shots

 
dsze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,241 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
Location: On The Lake!
     
May 31, 2004 08:38 |  #16

Khalid, don't you mean that if I tried f8 and >, that I'd gain DOF? I'm guessing that I'd probably gain some sharp-ness too, but as Mike said, would have to soften the background artificially.....which might be worth it.


-daniel
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
-Gear List-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whaler
Senior Member
Avatar
445 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: S.F. Bay Area Kalifornia
     
May 31, 2004 09:33 |  #17

Ya gotta love the 70-200. #6 and 11 are great. . . . . . and ahhhh don't get to close to the fisheman. :wink:


I'm a Proud Supporter of P.E.T.A.
"People Eating Tasty Animals"
5D MK II ~ 24-70 MKII L ~ 70-200 f/4 IS L ~ 580ex II ~ B&W filters (ouch) ~ Gitzo G1228 ~ Markins Q-Ball M10 ~ Epson 3880

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mjordan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,339 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Apr 2002
Location: Hillsboro, OR
     
May 31, 2004 09:38 |  #18

Daniel, The DOF on a digital camera isn't the same (more or less) as a film camera. So where f2.0 would blow out the background on film, on digital cameras it's only going to make it out of focus. There's a lot of math involved as to why (has to do with sensor size, pixles and things like that, but mostly I just looked at my images when I went from film to digital and found my backgrounds were not being as blown out with the same lenses and settings as they were on my EOS 3.

The other aspect of digital over film, is that you need lenses that are sharper (hence better quality and more expensive) for digital than you do film. This is why so many people that switched to digital find they don't get as sharp a picture with their kit lens as they did with their film camera.

Here are a few links that will probably explain it better than I can... and I know there are a number of people on here that can explain it as this is where I have read about it a lot.

http://wrotniak.net/ph​oto/dof/ (external link)
http://www.photo.net/l​earn/optics/dofdigital​/ (external link)
http://www.luminous-landscape.com …standing-series/dof.shtml (external link)


I hope some of this information helps.

Mike


Hillsboro, OR
Canon 1DMKII and lots of "L"
http://www.sitnprettyp​hoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,241 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
Location: On The Lake!
     
May 31, 2004 14:53 |  #19

Yes, I've been reading about this and it seems it has to do with the crop factor (1.6) of the 300D & 10D. That is, the circle of blur doesn't extend as far out, because of the sensor size.

Off Topic: (sorry)

WHALER; Fishermen, Smishermen! :) I used to worry about staying way clear of the fishermen, but my attitude has changed a bit. Every weekend there are bass tournaments on our lake and every high-dollar bass boat comes by my dock/boathouse and throws their luers under my boat house, onto my boat lift, INTO MY BOAT, and are constantly loosing their luers in our swim area, where my 2 little girls spend time in the water. I fully acknowledge that no one owns the water, but if they can't show enough mutual respect to not throw luers under, into and around my boat & dock, then I'm not going to worry too much about steering far away from them when we're skiing/wakeboarding. I guess I've dug 1 too many rusty hooks out of my upholstery, dock and feet! That said, remember on those shots I was shooting at 200mm FL...so we weren't as close as it appears.

-daniel


-daniel
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
-Gear List-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whaler
Senior Member
Avatar
445 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: S.F. Bay Area Kalifornia
     
May 31, 2004 15:16 |  #20

Wo! Wo! Wo! Bro. . . . :oops: not trying to start a pissing contest. It's just that some people are just inconsiderate, including the **** fisherman that crosses my lines while trolling and toss lures where kids a swimming. I fish a very large lake, Berryessa, in CA. It's one of the largest impounds in the state. I'll be trolling along in a REMOTE part of the lake and some &$#@ water skier, wakeboard, or 3 kids on a GIANT frog come wizzing by. Consideration was all that I was implying. :wink:


I'm a Proud Supporter of P.E.T.A.
"People Eating Tasty Animals"
5D MK II ~ 24-70 MKII L ~ 70-200 f/4 IS L ~ 580ex II ~ B&W filters (ouch) ~ Gitzo G1228 ~ Markins Q-Ball M10 ~ Epson 3880

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,241 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
Location: On The Lake!
     
May 31, 2004 16:08 |  #21

lol....easy whaler. Consideration is exactly all that I was implying. Consideration works both ways....not that your one of those fishermen with 100 luers in my boathouse. I wasn't saying that at all. Maybe, being a fisherman though, you could tell me why it is so important to toss lines underneath peoples' boats that are hanging in their boat lifts? What makes that such an attraction that some fishermen are so intent that they disregard all "consideration" for my property and throw luers at my ski boat?

By the way, #6,11 are probably my 2 favorites as well.

-daniel


-daniel
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
-Gear List-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
May 31, 2004 16:49 |  #22

So now, about that bokeh...;)


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
May 31, 2004 17:33 |  #23

Dsze: Next time also try some slower shutter shots. Freezing the water scene is cool and you have some great shots here. I love the water in 3600. Very cool. However, slower shutter shots can give a different perspective of action and it makes for a neat effect on water. It's nice to have a mix. That's what I do when shooting the Sprint Boats.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,241 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
Location: On The Lake!
     
May 31, 2004 20:02 |  #24

Jim,

I do like the effect of slow shutters with movement...I was worried though when shooting these that without the very fast shutter, I would not only get the water-movement, but I'd also get a blurry wakeboarder. How slow were you thinking of trying?

I love shooting these (probably because I love wakeboarding as much as photography) ...but the bummer is that I never get to see shots of myself. I guess I need to get some friends who are not only into wakeboarding, but also into photography! :)


-daniel
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
-Gear List-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
May 31, 2004 22:17 |  #25

Experiment. I'd play with 1/250 a bit, but would go for about the 1/500 to 1/1000 range. Depends on what the subject is doing. If they are crossing behind the boat then you'd hope your Drebel would kick into AI Servo and follow the subject. With AI Servo it's pretty easy, but you'll just have to experiment a bit and see what the camera does.

If they are straight behind the boat 1/500 should be fine. But, motion blur even on the subject can be a good thing too.

I've done pans as low as 1/15 with some great effects. You get a lot of throwaways shooting at slow speeds, but when you get a keeper, they're awesome.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whaler
Senior Member
Avatar
445 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: S.F. Bay Area Kalifornia
     
Jun 01, 2004 05:51 |  #26

Maybe, being a fisherman though, you could tell me why it is so important to toss lines underneath peoples' boats that are hanging in their boat lifts?


Don't know Dan, I've never understood Bass fisherman. Sparkles on boats? Outboards the size of refrigerators pumping out a gazillion horse power? :roll: Anyways. . . . ya gotta love the 70 - 200


I'm a Proud Supporter of P.E.T.A.
"People Eating Tasty Animals"
5D MK II ~ 24-70 MKII L ~ 70-200 f/4 IS L ~ 580ex II ~ B&W filters (ouch) ~ Gitzo G1228 ~ Markins Q-Ball M10 ~ Epson 3880

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,241 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
Location: On The Lake!
     
Jun 01, 2004 08:59 |  #27

Ha ha...ok, I hear ya. I think the sparkly boats are what push me over the edge! :shock: ....and the fact that they need those gazzillion HP to run 75mph across the lake.....cause you know the fish will only wait so long for you. If you don't get there as fast as you can they might be gone! lol


Anyway, Should the DREB kick into servo mode automatically or is that a setting I've missed somewhere? For all of these shots I had just the center focus-point selected. Should I have been doing something else?

-daniel


-daniel
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
-Gear List-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whaler
Senior Member
Avatar
445 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Location: S.F. Bay Area Kalifornia
     
Jun 01, 2004 11:38 |  #28

I think you were right on target. #6 the handle is in focus even though it's partially submerged.


I'm a Proud Supporter of P.E.T.A.
"People Eating Tasty Animals"
5D MK II ~ 24-70 MKII L ~ 70-200 f/4 IS L ~ 580ex II ~ B&W filters (ouch) ~ Gitzo G1228 ~ Markins Q-Ball M10 ~ Epson 3880

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,241 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
Location: On The Lake!
     
Jun 01, 2004 12:37 |  #29

Yes, I was really impressed with how fast this lens focused for these shots. At 200mm, when I wanted to get him in the air, I couldn't follow him through the viewfinder from the flats into the wake and into the air. So, I just pointed at the sweet spot in the wake and waited for him...as soon as he came into frame I placed the center dot on him and shot.


-daniel
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."
-Gear List-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,349 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
New 70-200 f4L Wakeboard Shots
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2570 guests, 94 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.