Khalid, don't you mean that if I tried f8 and >, that I'd gain DOF? I'm guessing that I'd probably gain some sharp-ness too, but as Mike said, would have to soften the background artificially.....which might be worth it.
May 31, 2004 08:38 | #16 Khalid, don't you mean that if I tried f8 and >, that I'd gain DOF? I'm guessing that I'd probably gain some sharp-ness too, but as Mike said, would have to soften the background artificially.....which might be worth it. -daniel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Whaler Senior Member 445 posts Joined Mar 2003 Location: S.F. Bay Area Kalifornia More info | May 31, 2004 09:33 | #17 Ya gotta love the 70-200. #6 and 11 are great. . . . . . and ahhhh don't get to close to the fisheman. I'm a Proud Supporter of P.E.T.A.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mjordan Goldmember 1,339 posts Likes: 5 Joined Apr 2002 Location: Hillsboro, OR More info | May 31, 2004 09:38 | #18 Daniel, The DOF on a digital camera isn't the same (more or less) as a film camera. So where f2.0 would blow out the background on film, on digital cameras it's only going to make it out of focus. There's a lot of math involved as to why (has to do with sensor size, pixles and things like that, but mostly I just looked at my images when I went from film to digital and found my backgrounds were not being as blown out with the same lenses and settings as they were on my EOS 3. Hillsboro, OR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 31, 2004 14:53 | #19 Yes, I've been reading about this and it seems it has to do with the crop factor (1.6) of the 300D & 10D. That is, the circle of blur doesn't extend as far out, because of the sensor size. -daniel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Whaler Senior Member 445 posts Joined Mar 2003 Location: S.F. Bay Area Kalifornia More info | May 31, 2004 15:16 | #20 Wo! Wo! Wo! Bro. . . . I'm a Proud Supporter of P.E.T.A.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 31, 2004 16:08 | #21 lol....easy whaler. Consideration is exactly all that I was implying. Consideration works both ways....not that your one of those fishermen with 100 luers in my boathouse. I wasn't saying that at all. Maybe, being a fisherman though, you could tell me why it is so important to toss lines underneath peoples' boats that are hanging in their boat lifts? What makes that such an attraction that some fishermen are so intent that they disregard all "consideration" for my property and throw luers at my ski boat? -daniel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
defordphoto MKIII Aficionado 9,888 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2002 Location: Pacific Northwest More info | May 31, 2004 16:49 | #22 So now, about that bokeh... defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
LOG IN TO REPLY |
defordphoto MKIII Aficionado 9,888 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2002 Location: Pacific Northwest More info | May 31, 2004 17:33 | #23 Dsze: Next time also try some slower shutter shots. Freezing the water scene is cool and you have some great shots here. I love the water in 3600. Very cool. However, slower shutter shots can give a different perspective of action and it makes for a neat effect on water. It's nice to have a mix. That's what I do when shooting the Sprint Boats. defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 31, 2004 20:02 | #24 Jim, -daniel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
defordphoto MKIII Aficionado 9,888 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2002 Location: Pacific Northwest More info | May 31, 2004 22:17 | #25 Experiment. I'd play with 1/250 a bit, but would go for about the 1/500 to 1/1000 range. Depends on what the subject is doing. If they are crossing behind the boat then you'd hope your Drebel would kick into AI Servo and follow the subject. With AI Servo it's pretty easy, but you'll just have to experiment a bit and see what the camera does. defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Whaler Senior Member 445 posts Joined Mar 2003 Location: S.F. Bay Area Kalifornia More info | Jun 01, 2004 05:51 | #26 Maybe, being a fisherman though, you could tell me why it is so important to toss lines underneath peoples' boats that are hanging in their boat lifts?
I'm a Proud Supporter of P.E.T.A.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 01, 2004 08:59 | #27 Ha ha...ok, I hear ya. I think the sparkly boats are what push me over the edge! -daniel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Whaler Senior Member 445 posts Joined Mar 2003 Location: S.F. Bay Area Kalifornia More info | Jun 01, 2004 11:38 | #28 I think you were right on target. #6 the handle is in focus even though it's partially submerged. I'm a Proud Supporter of P.E.T.A.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 01, 2004 12:37 | #29 Yes, I was really impressed with how fast this lens focused for these shots. At 200mm, when I wanted to get him in the air, I couldn't follow him through the viewfinder from the flats into the wake and into the air. So, I just pointed at the sweet spot in the wake and waited for him...as soon as he came into frame I placed the center dot on him and shot. -daniel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2570 guests, 94 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||