I have a canon 50 f1.4, canon 24 70L F2.8 and a CANON 85 f1.8 for a average room in low light, which would be best.
Without using flash.
BLEITH1965 Senior Member 465 posts Likes: 7 Joined Feb 2007 More info | Jun 19, 2007 01:07 | #1 I have a canon 50 f1.4, canon 24 70L F2.8 and a CANON 85 f1.8 for a average room in low light, which would be best.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Jun 19, 2007 01:15 | #2 BLEITH1965 wrote in post #3402014 I have a canon 50 f1.4, canon 24 70L F2.8 and a CANON 85 f1.8 for a average room in low light, which would be best. ![]() Without using flash.the 85 1.8. the others are short-ish for portraits. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
orisky Goldmember 1,398 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: the oc More info | Jun 19, 2007 01:25 | #3 On the FF, i definitely prefer the 85.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jarrad Senior Member 801 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: B.C., Canada More info | Jun 19, 2007 01:34 | #4 I regularly use the 50 1.4 for portraiture on the 5D.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
harrin Member 100 posts Likes: 5 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Finland More info | 50/1.4 for full body and 3/4 portraits, 85/1.8 for head and shoulders. Both are excellent portrait lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KevC Goldmember 3,154 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: to More info | Jun 19, 2007 12:20 | #6 24-70L Too much gear...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 Cream of the Crop 7,714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info |
TeeWhy "Monkey's uncle" 10,596 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Pasadena, CA More info | Jun 19, 2007 12:46 | #8 50mm or 85mm would be better than a zoom as it's faster in my view. Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blue_max Goldmember 2,622 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: London UK More info | In truth, they all could be used quite successfully. There can be no generic answer as it depends on so many factors. If you can more clearly define 'portraits' you may get a more specific answer to your question. I am guessing you are thinking of buying the 5d as you say you have the lenses already? If that is the case, I would strongly suggest you give them all a workout and see which comes through best for you. .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mebailey Goldmember 1,992 posts Likes: 28 Joined Jul 2005 Location: USA More info | Jun 19, 2007 14:39 | #10 The best portrait lens(of the three) for FF is the 85mm f/1.8. If you shoot more than one or two people you will probably need to go shorter. Before I had my 50L I used the 24-70 for full body or small groups. I would use the 50/1.4 if I were you for these situations. I prefer primes for portraits because you get greater DOF control than with zooms generally.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JMHPhotography Goldmember 4,784 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2005 Location: New Hampshire More info | Jun 19, 2007 14:41 | #11 For me, the 50mm and 24-70mm for full length or 3/4, 85mm for bust and probably head/shoulder, but I think that the 135 f/2.0L is probably your best bet for the true head/shoulder or head shots. I don't have one, so I tend to use my 70-200 f/4 stopped down to f/8 for that purpose, in the studio. I know I don't have a 5D but I do use my 35mm occasional. ~John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SuzyView Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 19, 2007 14:47 | #12 Of the 3, the 85 will focus the fastest and be sharp. Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_Cohran Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 19, 2007 14:48 | #13 Of those 3 lenses, I'd use the 85 f/1.8. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drjiveturkey Senior Member 542 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Leesburg, VA More info | Jun 19, 2007 14:49 | #14 A little off topic, but if you're going to do indoor portraits, I would recommend getting studio lights too, or at least a flash & diffuser too. It all started as a hobby with a Rebel XT & KIT lens. $5K worth of equipment & $0 of income later, all I have to show for it is a harddrive full of pictures and priceless memories!! Yeah it's still worth it
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kobe629 Senior Member 694 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles More info | Jun 19, 2007 15:47 | #15 harrin wrote in post #3402239 50/1.4 for full body and 3/4 portraits, 85/1.8 for head and shoulders. Both are excellent portrait lenses. I second this.. Nikon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 705 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||