Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 20 Jun 2007 (Wednesday) 15:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

WHCC to the rescue!

 
JMHPhotography
Goldmember
Avatar
4,784 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2005
Location: New Hampshire
     
Jun 20, 2007 15:19 |  #1

I recently did the make-up date portraits for my daughter's dance school. The original photographer couldn't make it back in time to do them as they were waiting for some costumes that had not come in yet. I have found out that I now have the contract for to do the whole thing for next year. :) Anyway.. that's a different story and thread.

I sent my files to group photographers, a lab out of Washington state that specializes in team sports photos and products. The prices were good and the products were pretty decent, but my original order came back very poor. The photos looked HORRIBLE and that's an understatement. I called them up to resolve the issue and found that they do all sorts of color corrections and sharpness adjustments which on my already processed files looked extremely bad. They said, "you have to submit the files pretty much as they are out of the camera. I did and had them reprint the order and the prints looked "better" and ok to give my customers, but still not to the level of AWESOME that I have seen through WHCC and Mpix. So out of curiosity, I sent a few of the ORIGINAL processed files that came back looking so badly from GPA to WHCC. I even had one (of my daughter) printed up at 12x18 and I have to say I'm utterly floored by the difference. The WHCC prints look AMAZING and fantastic, which I'm used to seeing from them. But having the prints from GPA come back like they did, I was having doubts about my color management and workflow. I do not doubt now. The files were perfect, the printing was not. From now on, I send all my work to WHCC and just get the key chains and magnets from another vendor.

The reason I got the gig for next year is because the instructor found out what happened(I told her when she called to find out when she would get the photos) and she was impressed by the fact that I refused to try and pass off an inferior product and wanted to make it right, even at the risk of incurring extra expense. The other photographer did not do that. Fortunately, I didn't pay to have them reprinted which was good on GPA's part. I just think their digital workflow is just too far behind compared to WHCC, so the print quality suffers for it. When I did film with them, they were awesome.


~John

(aka forkball)
Have a peek into my Gearbag. and My flickr (external link)
editing of my photos by permission only. Thanks

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

671 views & 0 likes for this thread.
WHCC to the rescue!
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2715 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.