Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 23 Jun 2007 (Saturday) 08:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Problem? Me or the EF-S 17-55 F.2.8

 
MauiTiki
Member
149 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2003
     
Jun 23, 2007 08:44 |  #1

I posted this reply to my original post but thought maybe I should start a new one as now topic is different.

I have been test shooting the lens now and "honestly" so far, I don't know how to react. Maybe it's because I and a newbie and because I am use to the kit lens. So far out of the 100 shots I have taken, only a handful are sharp which is worrying me. Like I said, I have much to learn and maybe it's all me (human error). I have posted 5 photos to my PBase gallery. I am adding the link below (sorry if it's not allowed but I am a tad freaking now) Maybe there is something wrong with my lens? Maybe it's me. There is a shot in there that I took of a cleaning bottle, on a tripod, using the camera timer. I did not reduce the file so be warned, its large. Please look and tell me what you think? I also have the same shot with and without IS taken at night. MEGA difference.
Anyway, sorry for the long post . . . I just need you pro's to judge.
http://www.pbase.com/t​ikikity/gallery/efs_17​55_ (external link)
P.S. - I'm also not liking the lens flare . . . I take many sunrise & sunset photos. Any idea's? Would a hood help?
Thanks
Lisa


My Gallery http://www.pbase.com/t​ikikity (external link)
Canon 60D, Canon XT350D, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM
EF-S 18-200 IS, EF 50mm f/1.8
Canon G7X, Canon G3, Canon SD880 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
suyenfung
Senior Member
763 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Canton, OH
     
Jun 23, 2007 08:48 |  #2

they look fine to me. the only one that looks bad is the fantastik bottle and i think it was just misfocused.


cleveland ohio wedding photographer (external link) | gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MauiTiki
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
149 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2003
     
Jun 23, 2007 08:51 as a reply to  @ suyenfung's post |  #3

Thanks but see, that's the problem. It was dead on focused "on" the fantastic bottle, on a tripod, using the camera timer.


My Gallery http://www.pbase.com/t​ikikity (external link)
Canon 60D, Canon XT350D, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM
EF-S 18-200 IS, EF 50mm f/1.8
Canon G7X, Canon G3, Canon SD880 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yamaha451
Senior Member
Avatar
466 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Jun 23, 2007 11:41 as a reply to  @ MauiTiki's post |  #4

I'm no pro by any means, but I dont like to test my lenses on a tripod...theres just too much chance for camera shake (ie. unstable tripod, shutter slap). I rarely get the sharpest photos with long exposures. Movement was definately a problem with the car pics. The Fantastic bottle looks front focused to me. The top of the bottle seems more in focus than the logo. The cat and the first photo both look pretty sharp to me, albeit its hard to tell with a small print. I would try shooting outside with a shutter speed of 200 or better, to eliminate shake as an issue.


-Mark-
5DII||35L|Sigma 85 1.4|24-105L| 580EX IIhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=765323

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BasherXt
Member
Avatar
192 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: East Tn USA
     
Jun 23, 2007 12:01 |  #5

for the bottle shot, how close where you? with a f/2.8 if you were real close that might be the reason for the fuzzy text at the bottom if it just focused on the near top of the bottle? try doing a f-stop of 8,11,16,22 see if it is more in focus that way and step back a little bit??


http://heatware.com/ev​al.php?id=43191 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
khiromu
Senior Member
260 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Jun 23, 2007 13:46 |  #6

Just to make sure, the IS is off when you shoot on a tripod, right?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sumocomputers
Member
Avatar
116 posts
Joined Apr 2006
     
Jun 23, 2007 17:02 as a reply to  @ khiromu's post |  #7

The cat and candle/light look fine.

The car photo probably needs a faster shutter speed, and an increase in ISO if necessary, since you were using .60 seconds (about 1/2 second). That seems way too long (even IS cannot work miracles).

Fantastic bottle? Not sure where you were focusing.

Also, try shooting with some daylight (or good ambient lighting) as a starting point, and have some items with different depths (like a line of 5 batteries at a 45 degree angle). Be very deliberate on where you focus on the middle battery, then look at the results. You might be having a front or back focus problem. If so, you can mistake this for the lens being soft. If you have problems with any of the above, you can stop and get a replacement or calibration.

And I have seen the lens flare issue mentioned before as a problem with this lens. It bothers some, and not others (like me). Lens flare can even create an interesting effect.


No amount of experience can make up for defective equipment.
[Gear List] [My Photos] (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,981 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Jun 23, 2007 17:19 |  #8

Hi Lisa,

I also think the pictures look good. The car at 0.6 s is amazingly sharp for such a shutter speed, even with IS.

The bottle was taken from a tripod, with the timer, you mention. That is not necessarily a good test. You need to use the centre focus point for this, and auto focus shouldn't be operated by hand when using a tripod. The chances are that you can't get it right, unless you use a remote (cable) switch, because of induced shake when pressing the button for auto-focusing. Furthermore, it is best to switch of IS, as IS needs to stabilize before the picture is taken, as you may otherwise introduce IS-induced shake.

IOW, this bottle test isn't a good way to see if the lens is ok when it comes to focusing.

You do need to switch off IS and use a remote cable switch, and preferably mirror lock-up (MLU) too, unless you have an extremely heavy tripod. And as others mention, to test AF it is best to use the AF test chart, a few batteries, or something similar, rather than a single object.

HTH, kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MauiTiki
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
149 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2003
     
Jun 24, 2007 09:41 as a reply to  @ wimg's post |  #9

Thank you everyone for your replies. To answer the question on the Fantastic bottle, yes the IS was turned OFF while on the tripod. The car shots I know are not in focus. I was just showing how GREAT the IS can be. I carefully went to the beach yesterday and took some shots. I have to say I am impressed. I posted 2 new shots to my gallery
http://www.pbase.com/t​ikikity/image/81055583 (external link)
http://www.pbase.com/t​ikikity/image/81055505 (external link)

Overall it's a keeper . . I just have much to learn.
Thanks again
Lisa


My Gallery http://www.pbase.com/t​ikikity (external link)
Canon 60D, Canon XT350D, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM
EF-S 18-200 IS, EF 50mm f/1.8
Canon G7X, Canon G3, Canon SD880 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tdaugharty
Goldmember
Avatar
1,018 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Jun 24, 2007 10:01 |  #10

There is always the comfort of sending it in for calibration. A sense of assurance. I sent my 24-70 in when I first got it with similar concerns and it came back with the same problems .. It was me and my adjustment to the lens.


Canon 5D / XTi - Epson R1800 - Sekonic L-558R
580EXII Speedlite / 430EX Speedlight / Strobes / Props
EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS / 24-105mm f/4L IS / 70-200mm f/2.8L IS / 100-400 f/4.5L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asylumxl
Goldmember
2,306 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Stuck in an invisible box
     
Jun 24, 2007 10:21 |  #11

the bottle photo is front focused, on the top of the neck of the bottle.


...............
I M A G E I N A T I O N
..........WEBSITE (external link)
...............
Pixel peeping is like count the sides of a circle, pointless.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,981 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Jun 24, 2007 10:24 |  #12

I think I'd like to see a few more pictures, preferably with an indication of the focus point. Both new pictures are a little OOF, if you ask me.

Sorry about this.

Kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmr
Member
156 posts
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 24, 2007 10:39 |  #13

MauiTiki wrote in post #3425713 (external link)
Thanks but see, that's the problem. It was dead on focused "on" the fantastic bottle, on a tripod, using the camera timer.

I think you need a few more tests to see how your XT is focusing with the lens. The XT focus spec is within DOF and it looks as if the bottle shot is right at this extreme (front wise). On my XTi my 17-55 still shows some focus variation even with the Xti's tighter AF spec with faster lenses.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MauiTiki
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
149 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2003
     
Jun 24, 2007 13:46 |  #14

Hi Again

Thank you so much for all your thoughts and suggestions. At times I really think it's just me. I took and added a few more:
http://www.pbase.com/t​ikikity/image/81070413 (external link) (crop version)
http://www.pbase.com/t​ikikity/image/81070405 (external link) (original)

Wim - no need to say sorry - this is why I am asking for opinions. I double checked both those shots and I have to say on my moniter they were sharp *zoomed in 100%" I wonder since I resized down for PBase if it lost something . . .hmmmm.


My Gallery http://www.pbase.com/t​ikikity (external link)
Canon 60D, Canon XT350D, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM
EF-S 18-200 IS, EF 50mm f/1.8
Canon G7X, Canon G3, Canon SD880 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,981 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Jun 24, 2007 14:33 |  #15

Hi Lisa,

MauiTiki wrote in post #3431991 (external link)
Hi Again

Thank you so much for all your thoughts and suggestions. At times I really think it's just me. I took and added a few more:
http://www.pbase.com/t​ikikity/image/81070413 (external link) (crop version)
http://www.pbase.com/t​ikikity/image/81070405 (external link) (original)

Wim - no need to say sorry - this is why I am asking for opinions. I double checked both those shots and I have to say on my moniter they were sharp *zoomed in 100%" I wonder since I resized down for PBase if it lost something . . .hmmmm.

Ok, that explains a lot. I think it lost something :). You'll need to do your own cropping and resizing, followed by a little USM sharpening for the web, otherwise they will look a little less sharp then the pictures could look. So don't let Pbase do your resizing - it doesn't do the additional step required.

I had a look at the water flowers, and it seems it is focused on the flower just to the right of the middle of the picture. Can you post a full size picture of that, to make it a little easier to see?

I also had another look at the plastic bottle, and it clearly is focused on th ehorizontal depressions in the neck of the bottle, with only a few mm of DoF. This is clear from looking at the table(?) th ebottle is positioned on. So, that looks good to me.

BTW, as an ex-350D owner (I upgraded a few months ago to a 400D, at a fairly low cost to me), I used a specific little trick that helped a lot with accurate focusing on the 350D, namely assigning AF to the * button via Custom Function 4 (CFn 4), and focusing twice. Just set it to option 3 (default is 0). It allows you to focus with the * button i.s.o. a combined action of the shutter button. This also means you can focus more than once to get focus right, before pressing the shutter button. Metering is done still when pressing the shutter button.

I did this, and actually do still on the 400D, with only the center AF button activated. Now, on the 350D, I found that in low light and/or low contrast situations, focusing exactly twice would get focus spot on. This is easy to do if AF is assigned to the * button (second button from the top right at the back of the camera). Also, it means it is easy to focus exactly on the item or subject you want in focus, then reframe for composition, and press the shutter button to take the picture.

Of course this won't help a lot with fast moving subjects, but I do even use it for candid portraits and the like.

Kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,123 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Problem? Me or the EF-S 17-55 F.2.8
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1279 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.