It's as creamy as yogurt
http://www.pbase.com/image/23885645
timmyquest Goldmember 4,172 posts Joined Dec 2003 Location: Outside of Chicago More info | Jun 01, 2004 23:28 | #1  Permanent banIt's as creamy as yogurt Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DieselGirl Senior Member  270 posts Joined Apr 2004 More info | Jun 02, 2004 00:05 | #2 very cool.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackviolet Goldmember  1,313 posts Likes: 4 Joined Apr 2004 Location: sydney, au (now in singapore for a few years) More info | Jun 02, 2004 00:47 | #3 whoa - especially since he appears to be a ni*on user - with some nice shots @f/10 @400mm?!! --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackviolet Goldmember 1,313 posts Likes: 4 Joined Apr 2004 Location: sydney, au (now in singapore for a few years) More info | Jun 02, 2004 00:47 | #4 whoa - especially since he appears to be a ni*on user - with some nice shots @f/10 @400mm?!! --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
droosan Member 200 posts Joined Jul 2002 More info | Jun 02, 2004 13:00 | #5 I am wondering if the photographer has Knocked-out the bird and digitally blurred the background. The border between the edge of the bird's feathers and the background appears suspect to me. I am not certain of this.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 02, 2004 13:09 | #6 droosan wrote: I am wondering if the photographer has Knocked-out the bird and digitally blurred the background. The border between the edge of the bird's feathers and the background appears suspect to me. I am not certain of this. That would be a mighty fine job he did, if he did that. :P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
darrenb Junior Member 20 posts Joined Jun 2003 Location: Manchester, UK More info | Jun 02, 2004 14:17 | #7 I think there's something come loose in his lens as it's clearly taking double exposures wedding photographer manchester
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OviV Goldmember  1,129 posts Joined Oct 2003 Location: Miami, FL More info | Jun 02, 2004 14:38 | #8 In my humble opinion, that picture is definitely shopped (click on it to get full size that I blew up and look at edges):
5D, 40D, Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX, Sigma 15MM Fisheye,17-40 L, 24-105 L, 50 1.8, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS, 100-400 L, 300 F4 L, 580 ex, Sigma 500 Super DG Flash x 2, too much other stuff to list.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
roanjohn Goldmember  3,805 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2003 Location: New York, NY More info | Jun 02, 2004 14:40 | #9 OviV wrote: In my humble opinion, that picture is definitely shopped (click on it to get full size that I blew up and look at edges): Or oversharpened
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OviV Goldmember 1,129 posts Joined Oct 2003 Location: Miami, FL More info | Jun 02, 2004 14:42 | #10 I think if it was oversharpened you would see it around the eye. What I see on th edge is the results of a bad selection. 5D, 40D, Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX, Sigma 15MM Fisheye,17-40 L, 24-105 L, 50 1.8, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS, 100-400 L, 300 F4 L, 580 ex, Sigma 500 Super DG Flash x 2, too much other stuff to list.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 02, 2004 19:53 | #11 Permanent banTo be honest, i hadnt even thought of it being PS'ed. I guess it's more then likely a possibility, quiet frankly i dont like the photo, it just does not look right heh. Capturing life a fraction of a second at a time
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aekurth Mostly Lurking 10 posts Joined Sep 2002 More info | Jun 02, 2004 20:21 | #12 I don't think that the background has been replaced. It is quite possible to get results like that with a 500mm wide open. None of the other photos in his gallery show evidence of background enhancement. I think that he deserves credit for a fine photo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ronchappel Cream of the Crop Honorary Moderator  3,554 posts Joined Sep 2003 Location: Qld ,Australia More info | Jun 02, 2004 22:32 | #13 You're all dreaming
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomC Member 78 posts Joined May 2004 Location: The east coast of Florida, USA :) More info | Jun 03, 2004 05:41 | #14 what does it matter if its shopped. Dont all of you 'shop' your pics??? Looks mighty fine to me. Whether its 'shopped' or not. Just my 2 pence. This forum is awesome!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OviV Goldmember 1,129 posts Joined Oct 2003 Location: Miami, FL More info | Jun 03, 2004 06:17 | #15 I have no problem with shopping. I do it too. I did similar work on this picture because the background was too much in focus:
My point is that the Bokeh is not natural which was the premise of the original post. That is all. Ovi 5D, 40D, Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX, Sigma 15MM Fisheye,17-40 L, 24-105 L, 50 1.8, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS, 100-400 L, 300 F4 L, 580 ex, Sigma 500 Super DG Flash x 2, too much other stuff to list.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2468 guests, 96 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
it's definitely 'normal