Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 24 Jun 2007 (Sunday) 13:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

im begging for help.... "please"

 
windoze
Goldmember
Avatar
1,397 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: NY
     
Jun 24, 2007 13:25 |  #1

i used to know how to pp my images. i used to use a Dell PC and CRT Monitor and would use Paint Shop Pro ( rarely Photoshop CS2 ) to make my images look good.
As a matter of fact on the bird forum here on POTN many used to say my images were gorgeous.....

so i bought an iMac 24" and now im using Elements 4.0 ( Cant afford CS3 and there is no Mac Paint Shop Pro. I havent posted any images in about 3 months coz i cant make them look nice....
they look "good" on my monitor but when I upload them and look at them say on a PC - they look flat and dull - too dark !
Im using a huey to calibrate my iMac LCD screen coz some people have said its a gamma thing - which i have no clue what that even means!
Im PP images and im just guessing what to do with elements 4. My imaghes look bright on my monitor but dull and drab on other monitors so i have to "guessitmate" how much brightness to add - this is a dumb way to PP.

If anyone can help me - i will be so greatful!!!!
If you can help me please use laymans terms coz i really dont understand the PP lingo too well... like i said i had a system that worked so good and now i cant even make a decent image without asking how it looks on other peoples monitors..

windoze


Canon 40D
Canon | EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | EF 400 f/5.6L |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JoeW
Senior Member
Avatar
619 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Alabama
     
Jun 24, 2007 14:04 |  #2

Are you shooting in Adobe RGB or sRGB? I'm not sure how Elements handles the conversion, but that's a possibility. Things that look good in Adobe RGB on my screen tend to look terrible when converted to sRGB if you don't follow the right steps (and since I don't use Elements, not sure what the correct steps are).


Gear: 5DII, 40D, 24-105 f4L, 100-400L; 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4 IS L, 17-40 f4 L, 50 f1.4, 550 EX (& a 10D w/ a broken shudder & an Elan IIe that still works)
Lightroom 3, Adobe CS6, a Mac Pro 8 core & Macbook Pro dual core flickr (external link) | www.watts-consulting.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 24, 2007 17:29 |  #3

windoze wrote in post #3431890 (external link)
i used to know how to pp my images. i used to use a Dell PC and CRT Monitor and would use Paint Shop Pro ( rarely Photoshop CS2 ) to make my images look good.
As a matter of fact on the bird forum here on POTN many used to say my images were gorgeous.....

so i bought an iMac 24" and now im using Elements 4.0 ( Cant afford CS3 and there is no Mac Paint Shop Pro. I havent posted any images in about 3 months coz i cant make them look nice....
they look "good" on my monitor but when I upload them and look at them say on a PC - they look flat and dull - too dark !
Im using a huey to calibrate my iMac LCD screen coz some people have said its a gamma thing - which i have no clue what that even means!

Im PP images and im just guessing what to do with elements 4. My imaghes look bright on my monitor but dull and drab on other monitors so i have to "guessitmate" how much brightness to add - this is a dumb way to PP.

If anyone can help me - i will be so greatful!!!!
If you can help me please use laymans terms coz i really dont understand the PP lingo too well... like i said i had a system that worked so good and now i cant even make a decent image without asking how it looks on other peoples monitors..

windoze

Windows has traditionally used a Gamma of 2.2 while the Mac OS has used 1.8. If you want your images to look good "universally", you should calibrate your monitor using a Gamma of 2.2, not 1.8.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

844 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
im begging for help.... "please"
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2729 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.