Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 02 Jun 2004 (Wednesday) 00:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon Digital Rebel Hacked Into A Pseudo-10D

 
shelbix2020
Senior Member
475 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
     
Jun 02, 2004 00:47 |  #1

"Now, a new hack that restores a previously hidden menu along with a few additional tricks has added nearly all of those 10D features to the Rebel, with an arguably superior user interface to boot."

- http://slashdot.org …l?tid=137&tid=1​64&tid=185 (external link)

crazy ... Id save that $500 and just get the Rebel. Why do companies do this? Why cant they just make 2 different products, is it so hard?

excuse me if this has been posted before...


Im pretty much like the best that I know of.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,333 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Jun 02, 2004 02:51 |  #2

It's not hard... but it's a LOT cheaper to produce two identical hardware devices and then limit the "lower end" product in software.


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport (external link)/Canoe Polo (external link)/Other Stuff (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Jun 02, 2004 09:01 |  #3

I think it's interesting that someone took the time to figure this out. Howver, this is akin to using bootlegged software and I certainly wouldn't support that.

I'd love to be a fly on the wall the first time someone running the hack takes their camera to a Canon service center.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tommykjensen
Cream of the Crop
21,013 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 260
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
     
Jun 02, 2004 09:12 |  #4

ssim wrote:
I think it's interesting that someone took the time to figure this out. Howver, this is akin to using bootlegged software and I certainly wouldn't support that.

I'd love to be a fly on the wall the first time someone running the hack takes their camera to a Canon service center.

Apparently that already has happened and on dpreview there are people saying Canon does not care they just service the 300D anyway.


EDITING OF MY PHOTOS IS NOT ALLOWED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blinking8s
Goldmember
Avatar
1,618 posts
Joined Jun 2004
Location: w.kentucky
     
Jun 02, 2004 09:50 |  #5

i've always been scared to attempt any hacked software for my 300d. Ive found several different packages in the short time I have had my camera and they have all come very highly recommended by people who seem to know more than i do. I know that I had to save for a LONG time to get my camera, and it would suck if something went wrong and Canon told me they couldn't help at all.

If canon chose to sell the firmware upgrade for say $100 I would probably choose that over a hack any day. But my curiousity its eating at me from the thought of unlocking some secret features...


blinking8s.com (external link) | pixelpost photoblog application (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Jun 02, 2004 10:12 |  #6

Apparently that already has happened and on dpreview there are people saying Canon does not care they just service the 300D anyway.

Well then I certainly hope that Canon wakes up and invalidates the warranty on the cameras that are hacked. This isn't doing anything but harm to the majority of Canon owners that live by the rules.

Yep, I feel pretty strongly about this. :!: :!:


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Location: Location:
     
Jun 02, 2004 10:28 |  #7

Ha! Some time ago there was a thread where numerous people were saying it can't be done, well here it is. Still, I like my 10D better than any kind of plastic rebel. It's not just the functions, I like it. Like a teddy bear. Um.. gotta go...


5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tommykjensen
Cream of the Crop
21,013 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 260
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
     
Jun 02, 2004 10:35 |  #8

ssim wrote:
Apparently that already has happened and on dpreview there are people saying Canon does not care they just service the 300D anyway.

Well then I certainly hope that Canon wakes up and invalidates the warranty on the cameras that are hacked. This isn't doing anything but harm to the majority of Canon owners that live by the rules.

Yep, I feel pretty strongly about this. :!: :!:

Uh oh You better keep that opinion here and not post it on dpreview :wink: People there will be mad at You :wink:

As You can see from my signature I have the 300D and I am quite happy with it. I don't currently miss the functions that the hack unlocks and I knew what I bought when I bought the 300D. I am not willing to risk my $1500 investment on a hack that nobody really know 100%. Besides some day I rather want to buy the MK II or III and until then I am happy with my 300D.


EDITING OF MY PHOTOS IS NOT ALLOWED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Digital ­ Prophet
Senior Member
538 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
     
Jun 02, 2004 10:35 |  #9

If you ask me, and noone is asking me, I don't think that this is going to hurt sales of the 10D all that much.

The vast majority of Rebel users are not going to hear about this firmware hack. And of the few that do, alot of them are going to just say no for fear of invalidating thier manufacturer/extended warranties. And then there will be the even small number of people (like me) who have no fear of the warranty monster, but don't want to screw thier cameras up. And finally there will be the small percent of the small percent that actually do it and live happily ever after.

It's just like "bootlegged movies" [Scary ghost voice]oooooooohh[/scar​y ghost voice] The movie industry wants you to believe that EVERYONE is downloading SpiderMan 2 and that the theaters are just empty shells with nothing but lonely ushers and three week old popcorn because NOONE goes to the movies. When in reality very very few people download movies (as a population percentage) and tickets sales reach new highs almost every single year.

I think Canon is doing the best thing it can by just ignoring the matter. Any campaign against the "hack" is just going to mak more and more people aware of it and want to try it. Can you say RIAA?

But like I said ... that is just if you're asking me.

- Digital Prophet -


Canon 300D, Canon 5D and some glass and some stuff.
"Your cooking makes me question my faith." - Bucky Katt

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shelbix2020
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
475 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
     
Jun 02, 2004 12:58 |  #10

If your wondering, I DO NOT have a Rebel or a 10D .... but Id like to now! :twisted:


Im pretty much like the best that I know of.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roanjohn
Goldmember
Avatar
3,805 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
     
Jun 02, 2004 12:58 |  #11

I don't see why its such a bad thing.

I mean it sure is "enter at your own risk" sorta thing but the things Canon disabled from the Rebel really "SUCKED!!!". I mean, FEC??!!! Even the G3 and S45 has the feature. And what about forced AI focus in creative modes?? How can you be creative when your camera refocus after you achieve focus?? Little gripe like these (though doesn't affect my photography in general) made me wish there was a better alternative.

And now there is!!! Thanks Wasia.

I'm sure that Canon is well aware of the hack and there is nothing they can do about it. It'll be interesting how they respond to it with the next Rebel upgrade.

R01




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Jun 02, 2004 13:48 |  #12

roanjohn wrote:
I don't see why its such a bad thing.


R01

I'll admit that I'm having a tough time letting this subject go.

There is a better alternative and it's called the 10D. You are out buying a Ford Focus and then want to turn it into a Mustang at no expense to yourself. If you want those features that you feel are necessary in the Rebel, then purchase the 10D. Hell I'd like to be able to turn my 10D into a MK II but I can't so I'm buying one.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Jun 02, 2004 14:15 |  #13

Well, it certainly makes sense that they would share a good deal of hardware, minus the obvious features such as the pentaprism and magnesium alloy body and that kind of thing. But the sensor, focus system, and probably much of the electronics are the same. This isn't unusual, and I'm still surprised that some people find it upsetting that any manufacturer would "defeature" a lower-priced product. That's the norm, not the exception.

When you buy a car, it comes prewired for just about every option that is available on that model whether you buy that option or not. Everything is designed to make it as universal as possible since this is the most cost-effective way of building them. Once you buy that car, you can use that wiring to add your own fog lights, auto-dimming mirrors, or whatever feature you want with aftermarket products. I doubt if its that much different for cameras.

Granted, modular pieces like memory chips or other things that can easily be added or subtracted may be left out on the less expensive model, but I'm pretty sure that Canon would try to keep the unique stuff down to a minimum.

So yes, perhaps a software solution for gaining some 10D features on the Digital Rebel is probably possible. And I don't worry too much about anybody making such a change to their own camera, or discussing such changes freely so long as nobody is stealing Canon's patented knowledge for commercial purposes. I mean, its their camera - they can do what they please with it.


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Jun 02, 2004 14:24 |  #14

I forgot to add the important stuff - Do this at your own risk!


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roanjohn
Goldmember
Avatar
3,805 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
     
Jun 02, 2004 14:35 |  #15

ssim wrote:
There is a better alternative and it's called the 10D.

I have a 10D..........without the magnesium black body ;-)a

Ro1




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,962 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
Canon Digital Rebel Hacked Into A Pseudo-10D
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1217 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.