Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 24 Jun 2007 (Sunday) 19:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Soft photos in CS2

 
jmbern
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jun 24, 2007 19:18 |  #1

Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could help me understand why my pictures look soft in Photoshop when I first open them up while they look much sharper and clearer in DIgital Photo Professional. I suppose it has something to do with how much "pre-sharpening" the program puts in the photos. However, having just bought a great new lens (the outrageously priced 85L 1.2), I have been disappointed to see my photos look soft in CS2.

Is there anything I should be doing differently? (Other than I suppose take better photos). I know the photos can be sharp (as they are in Digital Photo Professional). It would just be nice if they looked similar starting out in CS2.
Hope this question makes some sense.
Thanks,
Jonathan




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 25, 2007 00:24 |  #2

Jonathan, I presume you're using RAW, which is generally not sharpened. Do you do your RAW conversions using DPP or using photoshop? I'm guessing photoshop, as I think DPP does more sharpening by default.

ACR can be told to do more sharpening, and apparently ACR 4.1 is a big advance in that area, but that's CS3 only. Do you know about the unsharp mask or the newer smart sharpening? That's been in photoshop for years and works well. I use USM rather than smart sharpening.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,700 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jun 25, 2007 01:45 |  #3

Is it possible that the sharpness difference is just a viewing size problem? Are you viewing at 100% (ie 1 image pixel = 1 screen pixel) in both applications?


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jmbern
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jun 25, 2007 13:16 |  #4

Hi,
Thanks for you responses. When I open CS2 and Caera Raw, my images are at 15.5%. I assume this is why they look soft. When I enlarge them to 100%, they look unbelievably sharp. Can I make photoshop open the image at 100% without it becoming huge (and making it impossible to see the whole image)? Can you do this so that all the images will open this way? Or is this just not possible?
Also, I'm not exactly sure what you mean by raw converting- the book I have talks about batch re-naming (which I do), but I haven't been able to raw batch convert. (sorry, I'm pretty new to this photoshop thing).
Jonathan




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,700 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jun 25, 2007 15:16 |  #5

jmbern wrote in post #3437156 (external link)
Can I make photoshop open the image at 100% without it becoming huge?

I don't quite understand your question. As I said, 100% means one image pixel equals one screen pixel. The only way you can view the image at 100%, yet still see the whole image on screen, is if you have a very old 1 megapixel camera!

If your photos are razor sharp at 100%, that's all you need to worry about. Your outrageously-priced lens is doing a great job. Just be happy that you have such big, beautiful photos.

May I say, if you are still coming to terms with all aspects of Photoshop and digital post-processing, I'd recommend just shooting Jpeg for a while. Raw workflow is very confusing to begin with. Make yourself comfotable with everything else first - cropping, resizing, enhancing, printing, archiving, etc, etc, etc.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,185 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Soft photos in CS2
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2729 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.