Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 24 Jun 2007 (Sunday) 20:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

When I edit photos it usually makes them look grainy. *HELP*

 
onedownfiveup
Senior Member
Avatar
306 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Overland Park, KS
     
Jun 24, 2007 20:06 |  #1

What could cause this? Is there a way to stop this from happening?

I usually use shadow (10) /highlight (15), brightness(10) /contrast (10 - 15).

Maybe I'm over using those features and need smaller #'s.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

Canon 20D | Canon PowerShot A520 | Canon 200EG Deluxe Backpack | 18-55mm Kit Lens | EF 50mm f1.8 | 2 Vivitar 285HV's | 2 Pocket Wizard Plus II | 2 8' Light Stands and Flash Brackets| 2 Impact 32" White with Black Removable Backing Umbrella's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Jun 24, 2007 21:50 |  #2

You posted so many pics that those of us without a stellar internet connection can't stand the wait. The pics I do see look pretty good. Try posting the worst you have with EXIF. What are you using to edit them with?


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dekalbSTEEL
Goldmember
Avatar
1,793 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: NIU town, USA
     
Jun 24, 2007 21:54 |  #3

If you are adjusting exposure to lighten dark images, you will introduce some noise. If you 'shoot to the right" (slightly overexpose in RAW) and then adjust the exposure down, you will not have that problem.

And for what it's worth, I don't see it it any of these. Maybe just post a before and after of the same shot.


Grippy 30D, Tokina 300f4, Sigma 18-50f2.8, Canon 70-200f4L, thrifty50mkI, PM7500DX
Jon Gee Photography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
onedownfiveup
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
306 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Overland Park, KS
     
Jun 25, 2007 01:19 as a reply to  @ dekalbSTEEL's post |  #4

I use Photoshop CS 2.

I'll remember the shoot to the right. Thanks.

I posted them on another forum and someone said "why so grainy" and I couldn't really tell with my monitor or my parents that they were grainy if any at all.


Canon 20D | Canon PowerShot A520 | Canon 200EG Deluxe Backpack | 18-55mm Kit Lens | EF 50mm f1.8 | 2 Vivitar 285HV's | 2 Pocket Wizard Plus II | 2 8' Light Stands and Flash Brackets| 2 Impact 32" White with Black Removable Backing Umbrella's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,700 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jun 25, 2007 01:50 |  #5

Nobody's mentioned your ISO. What are you using? The higher the ISO, the more noise in the photo. Often it's not visible in the original file, but even the smallest amount of editing can bring it out.
Btw, I recommend avoiding the use of Brightness/Contrast. It's the most destructive tool in Photoshop. Get used to Levels, where you can use the histogram to avoid recklessly clipping detail (ie blowing out highlights/filling in shadows).


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howzitboy
Goldmember
2,948 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Hawaii
     
Jun 25, 2007 03:23 |  #6

your shot is 72dpi so its grainy. try set at 300dpi.


http://onehourwedding.​blogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Jun 25, 2007 07:14 |  #7

howzitboy wrote in post #3434967 (external link)
your shot is 72dpi so its grainy. try set at 300dpi.

That's complete rubbish.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carpenter
Goldmember
2,631 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 461
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Green Bay, WI
     
Jun 25, 2007 07:33 |  #8

howzitboy wrote in post #3434967 (external link)
your shot is 72dpi so its grainy. try set at 300dpi.


he could set his DPI at 1 or 1000 and it's not going to look any different on the computer screen.


5D Mk IV | 24-105L | 85 1.8 | 70-200L 2.8 IS MkII | 100-400L MkII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howzitboy
Goldmember
2,948 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Hawaii
     
Jun 25, 2007 12:47 |  #9

ahh sorry, i just took a guess lol .guess i guessed wrong. to me they dont look grainy at all so i was clutching at straws


http://onehourwedding.​blogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Jun 25, 2007 12:55 as a reply to  @ howzitboy's post |  #10

I don't see nay grain issues, but then again when you resize an image for web use you typically throw out any grain noise that is an issue.

When you say 1 person said something, do you mean 1, or has it been said more times than that.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
Jun 25, 2007 12:59 |  #11

howzitboy wrote in post #3434967 (external link)
your shot is 72dpi so its grainy. try set at 300dpi.

Eh ??? ??? ???

OP - I don't see them as particularly grainy (at this size) but IMO, I do see an over-use of the shadow/highlight tool to rescue the shadow detail from these shots, this in itself will introduce 'noise'

Rather than using brightness and contrast try using levels.


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howzitboy
Goldmember
2,948 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Hawaii
     
Jun 25, 2007 14:09 |  #12

carpenter wrote in post #3435541 (external link)
he could set his DPI at 1 or 1000 and it's not going to look any different on the computer screen.

yeah, i cant tell either.

IMAGE: http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j192/howzitboy/onedpi.jpg
one dpi

IMAGE: http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j192/howzitboy/onedpi1000dpi.jpg
1,000 dpi
j/k

http://onehourwedding.​blogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
Jun 25, 2007 14:36 |  #13

its PPI by the way ;)


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Jun 25, 2007 16:51 |  #14

howzitboy wrote in post #3437463 (external link)
yeah, i cant tell either.

QUOTED IMAGE
one dpi

QUOTED IMAGE
1,000 dpi
j/k

Actually they're both 85 ppi on my screen.

The first picture is 13x9 pixels, about 4x2.5mm.
The second one is 700x469 pixels, about 210x140mm.

I can't imagine why you think they have different levels of ppi, but you're not helping the OP.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
metalsaber
Member
Avatar
196 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Jun 25, 2007 18:21 |  #15

I don't see any problems with the OP's pictures.


Metalsaber's Blog (external link)
Metalsaber's Image Galleries (external link)
Flickr Gallery (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi, Canon 17-55IS USM, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, Canon 100-400L USM, Canon 100 f2.8 Macro, Tokina 12-24, Canon Speedlight 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,164 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
When I edit photos it usually makes them look grainy. *HELP*
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2691 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.