Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 25 Jun 2007 (Monday) 11:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

sharpening

 
ghosh
Senior Member
Avatar
874 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Edinburgh
     
Jun 25, 2007 11:03 |  #1

Does every picture that you take needs sharpening? I dont know with my 400D kit lens it looks like every picture that I have taken or i will take must have sharpening post process :rolleyes:. Right now my unsharp mask settings are 40,5.6,0

Ghosh


#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << "POTN is the best." << std::endl;
return 0; }


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Jun 25, 2007 11:08 |  #2

You could also try settings like 250,0.3,0 - that will sharpen fine details a lot more. If you have Photoshop CS3, then you can use a layer mask with USM, otherwise, search for "high pass sharpening" that's also a really good way of sharpening, as you can easily adjust what areas are sharpened.


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaDProFF
Goldmember
Avatar
4,369 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: East Sussex, UK
     
Jun 25, 2007 11:12 |  #3

funny I have been using PS CS2 USM on most of pictures of late

?% depends on photo
10
10

and then ?%
1
1


Photographic Images on Brett Butler (external link) px500 (external link) & Flickr (external link) Some Canon Bodies , few blackish lenses, A dam heavy black one, couple dirty white ones, a 3 legged walking stick, a mono walking stick, and a bag full of rubbish :oops:
And Still Learning all walks of life, & most of all Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howzitboy
Goldmember
2,948 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Hawaii
     
Jun 25, 2007 12:45 |  #4

yeah i agree, everyshot u edit needs sharpening. they come out to flat and ewww.


http://onehourwedding.​blogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
     
Jun 25, 2007 12:47 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

I use a Photoshop sharpening action by Panos that works very well for me. I don't have a direct link handy, but if you Google it, you'll find it.

And, yes, you do have to sharpen DSLR images. They're different than point and shoots.



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,700 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jun 25, 2007 15:29 |  #6

I've never seen a photo that didn't benefit from some sharpening. I use USM.

A couple of things to note:
1. Turn off all in-camera sharpening. It's not real sharpening, it's just artificial, and Photoshop can do a much MUCH better job than the little tiny computer in your camera.
2. Only sharpen your files after you've resized them for printing. Sharpening is very specific to size. I don't recommend sharpening your original files at all.
3. No artificial sharpening can ever truly rescue a poorly-focused photo.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Familiaphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,948 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jun 25, 2007 15:42 |  #7

I would recommend layer sharpening using High Pass. Very easy and fast and easy to apply to specific areas of a pic and then remove and redo if wanted. I do it in Photoshop Elements and it works like a champ.


Paul
Blog (external link) | Gear (external link) | Gallery (external link)
Bag Reviews: Domke F-3x | More to come...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ghosh
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
874 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Edinburgh
     
Jun 25, 2007 19:11 |  #8

hmmm.. so every digital image needs sharpening! Feew, looks like i need to open a new thread asking member to show me what kind of image needs what kinds of sharpening.

I have used high pass a couple of times but did you say "easy to apply to specific areas of a pic and then remove and redo if wanted" how is that possible?


#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << "POTN is the best." << std::endl;
return 0; }


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ghosh
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
874 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Edinburgh
     
Jun 25, 2007 19:16 |  #9

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


what kind of sharpening would you recommend for this picture:confused: ?
Ghosh

#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << "POTN is the best." << std::endl;
return 0; }


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
subtle_spectre
Goldmember
Avatar
1,657 posts
Joined Aug 2005
     
Jun 25, 2007 19:28 |  #10

Duplicate the layer and set blending to luminosity. Apply USM to that layer...try 200%-radius 1.2 and threshold3.



Scott
Vista owner...and user  :p _______________

Gear
www.scottcphotography.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Familiaphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,948 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jun 25, 2007 20:23 |  #11

If you are doing a high pass sharpening you can erase parts of the high pass layer you do not want to sharpen. For example, if you only want to sharpen the eyes erase all of the pic but the eyes. Just remember to set the High Pass layer to Hard Light and then all will be good. Experiment with the level in this as well, I usually use 1.0 to 2.0 depending on the subject, this methods sharpens really fast.


Paul
Blog (external link) | Gear (external link) | Gallery (external link)
Bag Reviews: Domke F-3x | More to come...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Familiaphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,948 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jun 25, 2007 21:15 |  #12

Here are a couple variations on sharpening using high pass filter.

#1: Original Image

#2: With a 1.0 radius


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Paul
Blog (external link) | Gear (external link) | Gallery (external link)
Bag Reviews: Domke F-3x | More to come...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Familiaphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,948 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jun 25, 2007 21:16 |  #13

Here are two more...

#3: WIth a 1.5 radius

#4: WIth a 2.0 radius


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Paul
Blog (external link) | Gear (external link) | Gallery (external link)
Bag Reviews: Domke F-3x | More to come...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Familiaphoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,948 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jun 25, 2007 21:28 |  #14

Finally, here is an example of a selective sharpening. I did a quick edit as to only get the vegitation, not the cleanest work, but you'll get the point. The High Pass filter is set to a 1.5 radius.

The original is the first image and the sharpened the second.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Paul
Blog (external link) | Gear (external link) | Gallery (external link)
Bag Reviews: Domke F-3x | More to come...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Emberghost
Senior Member
Avatar
554 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: California
     
Jun 25, 2007 21:54 |  #15

I usuallly use about 120 - 1.2 - 3 , but it always changes per picture.


20d | 7D | sigma 18-50 f2.8 macro | 50 f1.4 | 70-200 f2.8L
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,994 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
sharpening
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2716 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.