Does every picture that you take needs sharpening? I dont know with my 400D kit lens it looks like every picture that I have taken or i will take must have sharpening post process
. Right now my unsharp mask settings are 40,5.6,0
Ghosh
ghosh Senior Member 874 posts Joined Sep 2005 Location: Edinburgh More info | Jun 25, 2007 11:03 | #1 Does every picture that you take needs sharpening? I dont know with my 400D kit lens it looks like every picture that I have taken or i will take must have sharpening post process #include <iostream>
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goatee "nice but dim" 5,239 posts Joined May 2005 Location: North of London, UK More info | Jun 25, 2007 11:08 | #2 You could also try settings like 250,0.3,0 - that will sharpen fine details a lot more. If you have Photoshop CS3, then you can use a layer mask with USM, otherwise, search for "high pass sharpening" that's also a really good way of sharpening, as you can easily adjust what areas are sharpened. D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MaDProFF Goldmember 4,369 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: East Sussex, UK More info | Jun 25, 2007 11:12 | #3 funny I have been using PS CS2 USM on most of pictures of late Photographic Images on Brett Butler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
howzitboy Goldmember 2,948 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Hawaii More info | Jun 25, 2007 12:45 | #4 yeah i agree, everyshot u edit needs sharpening. they come out to flat and ewww. http://onehourwedding.blogspot.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
liza Cream of the Crop 11,386 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2005 Location: Mayberry More info | Jun 25, 2007 12:47 | #5 Permanent banI use a Photoshop sharpening action by Panos that works very well for me. I don't have a direct link handy, but if you Google it, you'll find it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Damo77 Goldmember 4,700 posts Likes: 115 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Brisbane, Australia More info | Jun 25, 2007 15:29 | #6 I've never seen a photo that didn't benefit from some sharpening. I use USM.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Familiaphoto Goldmember 3,948 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Chicago, IL More info | Jun 25, 2007 15:42 | #7 I would recommend layer sharpening using High Pass. Very easy and fast and easy to apply to specific areas of a pic and then remove and redo if wanted. I do it in Photoshop Elements and it works like a champ. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 25, 2007 19:11 | #8 hmmm.. so every digital image needs sharpening! Feew, looks like i need to open a new thread asking member to show me what kind of image needs what kinds of sharpening. #include <iostream>
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 25, 2007 19:16 | #9
what kind of sharpening would you recommend for this picture ?Ghosh #include <iostream>
LOG IN TO REPLY |
subtle_spectre Goldmember 1,657 posts Joined Aug 2005 More info | Jun 25, 2007 19:28 | #10 Duplicate the layer and set blending to luminosity. Apply USM to that layer...try 200%-radius 1.2 and threshold3.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Familiaphoto Goldmember 3,948 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Chicago, IL More info | Jun 25, 2007 20:23 | #11 If you are doing a high pass sharpening you can erase parts of the high pass layer you do not want to sharpen. For example, if you only want to sharpen the eyes erase all of the pic but the eyes. Just remember to set the High Pass layer to Hard Light and then all will be good. Experiment with the level in this as well, I usually use 1.0 to 2.0 depending on the subject, this methods sharpens really fast. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Familiaphoto Goldmember 3,948 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Chicago, IL More info | Jun 25, 2007 21:15 | #12 Here are a couple variations on sharpening using high pass filter. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Familiaphoto Goldmember 3,948 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Chicago, IL More info | Jun 25, 2007 21:16 | #13 Here are two more... Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Familiaphoto Goldmember 3,948 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Chicago, IL More info | Jun 25, 2007 21:28 | #14 Finally, here is an example of a selective sharpening. I did a quick edit as to only get the vegitation, not the cleanest work, but you'll get the point. The High Pass filter is set to a 1.5 radius. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Emberghost Senior Member 554 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: California More info | Jun 25, 2007 21:54 | #15 I usuallly use about 120 - 1.2 - 3 , but it always changes per picture. 20d | 7D | sigma 18-50 f2.8 macro | 50 f1.4 | 70-200 f2.8L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2716 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||