I recently had the opportunity to shoot a newsworthy event (right time, right place, right gear etc.). To my knowledge, no local papers had any photogs there. I snapped a few decent shots. I slapped together a quick gallery of the images and sent out a few emails to the local papers stating that I had images of this event that were available to be licensed. The gallery clearly stated that I retained all rights to the photos and provided contact information for licensing information and that larger size images were available.
Today i received an email from on of the editors thanking me and asking who to give credit to in the paper. I am well aware that photo credits don't pay the bills. I am surprised by this response, a newspaper editor should at least know what a copyright is. My other business advertises with this publication and the certainly don't do anything for free for me. It is a small town weekly newspaper, I was expecting something in the $25-40 range. I recently relocated to the area and what unsure what the going rates in this market are, but somebody I spoke to gets an additional $50 per article when he provides a photo for his articles for the local competing paper.
I thought the the email stating that the images were available to license and the copyright and license statement on the gallery would more than suggest that these images were not free for the taking. I did not set a price in the email or gallery because I was unsure what the market is here.
The original images were quite small (450 x 300). I did not expect somebody to rip them of for print. After the email 'thanking' me I did watermark them (perhaps too late).
I know their deadline is Wed. or so. I am thinking about sending and email to clarify that the images are copyrighted and I expect fair payment for their use. Any thoughts?
Rich






