Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 03 Jun 2004 (Thursday) 00:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Photos of Jupiter

 
Chazs
Senior Member
515 posts
Joined Aug 2002
Location: NW Washington
     
Jun 03, 2004 00:18 |  #1

I was outside tonight looking to take a few shots of the comets in the western sky. No luck, but I happened to catch some blurry images of the moons of Jupiter. I saw four moons with only a 200 mm (don't think I had my doubler on).

Have any of you had any luck shooting Jupiter with one of the 400 "L" lenses (or bigger)? Curious how well they work for this kind of photography.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WyzMan
Senior Member
Avatar
250 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 93
Joined Oct 2003
Location: Rochdale UK
     
Jun 03, 2004 03:07 |  #2

Any chance of a link to these photos? Must say, I have enough trouble with the Earth's moon and 400mm!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GenEOS
Senior Member
740 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Pearland, Texas
     
Jun 03, 2004 06:02 |  #3

I have problems with 3040mm.
Focus is a real pain.


Daniel Tunstall
http://www.dmtphoto.co​m (external link)
Sports Shooter Member
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=2474 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chazs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
515 posts
Joined Aug 2002
Location: NW Washington
     
Jun 03, 2004 08:16 |  #4

Photo of Jupiter Moons

They're not great, but I thought it was still pretty cool.

http://members.isp01.n​et/snevetsc/photos/jup​iter1.jpg (external link)

http://members.isp01.n​et/snevetsc/photos/jup​iter2.jpg (external link)

And, dang. I went to bed before the [edit] meteor came through last night. :(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Jun 03, 2004 08:41 |  #5

Chazs wrote:
They're not great, but I thought it was still pretty cool.

http://members.isp01.n​et/snevetsc/photos/jup​iter1.jpg (external link)

http://members.isp01.n​et/snevetsc/photos/jup​iter2.jpg (external link)

And, dang. I went to bed before the comet came through last night. :(

That was a meterorite and they think it hit near Chehalis. What scope did you use for that? Too bad the tracking was off.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chazs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
515 posts
Joined Aug 2002
Location: NW Washington
     
Jun 03, 2004 09:35 |  #6

Jim. I took them with the DRebel, and a 200mm Olympus lens. The exposures were 2.5 seconds and 4 seconds using ISO 100. Tracking? ;) I wish my tripod had tracking! Also, I may have used a doubler (an old vivitar) on these. If so, then it's about a 200(2)(1.6) = 640mm lens setup, or about a magnification of 13 power. I'll try some more tonight with higher ISO so the tracking isn't as noticeable.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,312 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
     
Jun 03, 2004 10:19 |  #7

You can't get any detail of the planet with regular lenses.. I imagine you'd need over 1000mm to even begin to see anything.

I've never tried with my 10D, but I did take some shots a year ago with my old Canon Pro90IS... It had an effective focal length of 480mm and I did the "digital zoom" thing by resampling the resulting photos X2 The 640x480 image attached was originally 320x240.

I combined two shots. I took a longer exposure to get the moons of jupiter properly exposed. Of course in that shot the planet was blown out.

Then I took a shorter exposure to get jupiter looking nicer.. I erased the blown out jupiter and put the nice one over top of where it was :)

It was just something to do :)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chazs
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
515 posts
Joined Aug 2002
Location: NW Washington
     
Jun 03, 2004 20:23 |  #8

Aaaaw, that's nice Jim. I'll have to try it. I have some photos from 1/30 of a second to 30 seconds. Anything beyond 5 seconds shows too much streaking, but I'll see if I can overlay two if the faster ones together. Looks like another clear night. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eric1
Senior Member
Avatar
729 posts
Likes: 32
Joined May 2003
Location: St. Louis, Mo.
     
Jun 04, 2004 00:34 |  #9

hmm, my only experience with a scope was ugly. i couldn't get it to focus at all. i guess that makes Jim's shot pretty good!

eric1


Eric
www.pbase.com/ericm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfong
Member
124 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Jun 04, 2004 00:47 |  #10

GenEOS wrote:
I have problems with 3040mm.
Focus is a real pain.

I use at least 7200mm and focusing was a real real pain.

Now I pre-focus using 'DSLR focus V2' plus a Haartman mask on a nearby star, then lock down the focuser and slew it toward Jupiter.
Now it is just a real pain.

Ken




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GenEOS
Senior Member
740 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Pearland, Texas
     
Jun 04, 2004 07:19 |  #11

kfong wrote:
GenEOS wrote:
I have problems with 3040mm.
Focus is a real pain.

I use at least 7200mm and focusing was a real real pain.

Now I pre-focus using 'DSLR focus V2' plus a Haartman mask on a nearby star, then lock down the focuser and slew it toward Jupiter.
Now it is just a real pain.

Ken

We have a Meade scope and I have rigged a counter balance for the weight of the D60. Now I guess I can try the Mark II. Problem is, I need to rig a camera support. The Meade just isn't strong enough at the t-adapter connection to support a DSLR.
I have not bought the focuser for it, but I don't know if it would help. The Meade scope just has too much slop in the adjustments, slewing etc....


Daniel Tunstall
http://www.dmtphoto.co​m (external link)
Sports Shooter Member
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/members.html?id​=2474 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfong
Member
124 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Jun 05, 2004 03:03 |  #12

GenEOS wrote:
We have a Meade scope and I have rigged a counter balance for the weight of the D60. Now I guess I can try the Mark II. Problem is, I need to rig a camera support. The Meade just isn't strong enough at the t-adapter connection to support a DSLR.
I have not bought the focuser for it, but I don't know if it would help. The Meade scope just has too much slop in the adjustments, slewing etc....

The Meade ETX T-adapter can barely handle the weight of a SLR camera in prime focus. With eyepiece projection (needed in photographing planets) you will end up with a much longer cantilever arm with the full weight of the camera hanging at the end of it all. The result is that T-adapter tends to flex and the fork mount clutch begin to slip. Plus the probability that the RA motor may not be able to handle all this weights and counter-weights. The higher magnification also makes the FOV much narrower. All these make locating and tracking just about impossible.
For photographing planets I use a 6" refractor with a 2" draw tube focuser on a HEQ5. The focuser is driven from a geared stepping motor extracted from an old Epson printer, giving very fine focusing movement. The whole assembly still droops a little after I attached the eyepiece projection tube + D60, but most of the time I can re-acquire a bright planet by nudging the camera around, then the real fun of trying to center and focus begins. Like I said before, it's a real pain.

Ken




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vic_izoita
Member
50 posts
Joined Feb 2004
     
Jun 05, 2004 06:20 |  #13

WyzMan wrote:
Any chance of a link to these photos? Must say, I have enough trouble with the Earth's moon and 400mm!

You made me laugh..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,132 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Photos of Jupiter
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2468 guests, 96 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.