I dont need it as a general purpose lens, 4 Inch could get very restrictive is the only issue, Anyone found that with this lens??
ANGUS THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop  6,897 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia... More info | Jul 30, 2007 06:27 | #16 I dont need it as a general purpose lens, 4 Inch could get very restrictive is the only issue, Anyone found that with this lens?? Angus
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LordV Macro Photo-Lord of the Year 2006  More info | Jul 30, 2007 07:06 | #17 NSWEP wrote in post #3635212  I dont need it as a general purpose lens, 4 Inch could get very restrictive is the only issue, Anyone found that with this lens?? Can only say I have both a 105mm EX macro lens and an MPE-65- because the minimum magnification is 1:1 with the MPE-65 you just can't fit many flowers/bugs in the view finder ie anything bigger than 22.5mm length for a 1.6 crop DSLR, so it is a specialist macro lens that starts where the normal macro lenses finish (ie 1:1). It can also take some getting used to if you are not used to macrophotgraphy. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ANGUS THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,897 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia... More info | Jul 30, 2007 16:04 | #18 Ok thanks, I will go for the 100mm Then for now. Angus
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2808 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
