Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 27 Jun 2007 (Wednesday) 17:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

LR 1.1 Sharpening

 
bcap
THREAD ­ STARTER
MR. PP
Avatar
7,364 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Niagara, Ontario
     
Jun 30, 2007 09:25 |  #16

EOSAddict wrote in post #3464205 (external link)
From what I have seen so far, you need to use the sliders a lot harder (ie more to the right) than you would traditionally do with USM.... is that a reasonable assumption?

Yes, that is what I am finding also.


Bryan
Bryan Caporicci's Personal Blog (external link)
Niagara Falls, Ontario Wedding and Portrait Photographer - Bryan Caporicci Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stephen ­ Martin
Member
Avatar
186 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
     
Jun 30, 2007 12:23 |  #17

Maybe this is redundant... But as noted in another thread - you can only view the results of sharpening in 1:1 ratio. For me I have found that I can actually oversharpen the image by quite a lot...and there really is some power in this new sharpening tool. (That video tutorial at http://www.layersmagaz​ine.com/category/light​room/ (external link) was quite helpful for me.)

It took me awhile to realize, however, that you can actually see the results of sharpening if you hit E (full screen view of the photo). So when I'm in Develop mode, I can easily toggle back and forth between D and E to see the results of my sharpening.


-Stephen
Canon 30D, Canon EFS 10-22, Sigma 17-70 DG Macro, Sigma 70-200 APO Macro, Canon EF 1.8 50mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mnealtx
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo
     
Jul 03, 2007 16:30 |  #18

You can use the little toggle in the upper left portion of the sharpening panel to turn it on/off as well...


Mike
Suggestions / critiques always welcomed - help me learn!https://photography-on-the.net …alphotography.s​mugmug.comMy Smugmug site (external link)
Gear Listing

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tekkie
Goldmember
Avatar
2,621 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Clarkston, MI
     
Jul 03, 2007 21:34 |  #19

it seems to work ok, but compared to photoshop yeah you have to really turn up those sliders


Canon 1DMKII, 7D, 5DMKII, 1D MKII
Canon 500L, 100-400L
, 70-200 2.8L, 17-40L, 24-105L, 24mm 2.8,50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 135mm 2.8 SF, 100mm Macro
Canon 430 & 580 flashes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stasber
Member
160 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Cork, Ireland
     
Jul 04, 2007 06:42 as a reply to  @ tekkie's post |  #20

I'm a little underwhelmed by the sharpening, maybe it's because I've not 'mastered' it yet but I don't seem to get much satisfaction out of it. I held off from using 1.0 much due to this but I'm still doing basic processing in DPP with stunning sharpening results, then fine tuning/finishing in LR.

But on it's own the LR sharpening hasn't given me anything to rave about. Shame as I'd like to quit DPP and work import to export all in LR. DPP is just too useful for some things :)


"David, what musical instrument do you play?" "I play the Hasselblad!" (David Redfern)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howfly
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jul 07, 2007 12:39 |  #21

EOSAddict wrote in post #3464205 (external link)
From what I have seen so far, you need to use the sliders a lot harder (ie more to the right) than you would traditionally do with USM.... is that a reasonable assumption?

Canon recommends radius 0.3 amount 300% as a starting point for USM for input sharpening in order to restore latent lens sharpness lost in the anti-alias filtering in camera hardware. All of my images get this treatment at the beginning of workflow. If I need to compensate for problems (anti-alias is not a problem), I'll do additional sharpening, but try and avoid it.

Lightroom treats sharpening as a way to correct flaws, and 1.1, although it adds some controls, still doesn't get to Canon recommendations. Forcing workflow through CS2 for input sharpening doesn't make sense.

Am I missing something?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lord_Malone
Cream of the Manpanties.....​... Inventor Great POTN Photo Book
Avatar
7,686 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
     
Jul 07, 2007 23:38 |  #22

bcap wrote in post #3450111 (external link)
Well, now that we have the equivalent (I think?) of USM in Lightroom, what are your thoughts on it?

What are you finding for some generic optimal settings?

What? When in the hell did this happen? What did I miss?


~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
http://www.myspace.com​/chocolate_thai (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOSAddict
Book Committee Immortal
Avatar
6,091 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Preston, Lancashire, England
     
Jul 08, 2007 15:33 |  #23

v1.1 Ed, wake up! ;)


Al
My Gear, My Website: www.endofthetrailphoto​graphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lowcrust
Senior Member
Avatar
948 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Scandinavia
     
Jul 08, 2007 17:58 |  #24

howfly wrote in post #3503035 (external link)
Canon recommends radius 0.3 amount 300% as a starting point for USM for input sharpening in order to restore latent lens sharpness lost in the anti-alias filtering in camera hardware. All of my images get this treatment at the beginning of workflow. If I need to compensate for problems (anti-alias is not a problem), I'll do additional sharpening, but try and avoid it.

Lightroom treats sharpening as a way to correct flaws, and 1.1, although it adds some controls, still doesn't get to Canon recommendations. Forcing workflow through CS2 for input sharpening doesn't make sense.

Am I missing something?

Certainly don't take my word for it but it seems to me that a 1.0 radius and 150 amount is not the same in LR and PS.


~ BORN FREE - TAXED TO DEATH! ~

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcap
THREAD ­ STARTER
MR. PP
Avatar
7,364 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Niagara, Ontario
     
Jul 08, 2007 18:06 |  #25

PS's USM is not the same as LR's Sharpen.


Bryan
Bryan Caporicci's Personal Blog (external link)
Niagara Falls, Ontario Wedding and Portrait Photographer - Bryan Caporicci Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScottE
Goldmember
3,179 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Kelowna, Canada
     
Jul 08, 2007 19:19 |  #26

There are two sharpening pre-sets in the left hand pop-up box. One is for portaits and the other for landscapes. I find that using the protrait one for portraits and the landscape for just about everything else gives me a good starting point to work from. The portrait pre-set applies a mask that prevents sharpening of surface defects such as skin blemishes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glenn ­ NK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,630 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
     
Jul 08, 2007 19:59 |  #27

ScottE wrote in post #3509391 (external link)
There are two sharpening pre-sets in the left hand pop-up box. One is for portaits and the other for landscapes. I find that using the protrait one for portraits and the landscape for just about everything else gives me a good starting point to work from. The portrait pre-set applies a mask that prevents sharpening of surface defects such as skin blemishes.

:oops: :oops: Don't know where I've been - I never noticed that until you mentioned it and I went looking.

Thanks for the tip.

Maybe I should look around more.;)


When did voluptuous become voluminous?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lord_Malone
Cream of the Manpanties.....​... Inventor Great POTN Photo Book
Avatar
7,686 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
     
Jul 09, 2007 00:51 |  #28

EOSAddict wrote in post #3508398 (external link)
v1.1 Ed, wake up! ;)

I've been out of the loop for quite a while. :(


~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
http://www.myspace.com​/chocolate_thai (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kadath
Right, Manage This Digit!
Avatar
1,642 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Navesink, NJ
     
Jul 09, 2007 14:13 |  #29

Another new video on sharpening here:
http://www.lightroomki​llertips.com …deo-tip-sharpening-in-11/ (external link)


Canon 20D, Nikon D300 & assorted stuff...
Kadath @ Flickr (external link) -- Hell, its a regular Dream-Quest... A "Digital American Walkabout" -- My Blog at Navesink.Net (external link)
Have you submitted shots to the official POTN Flickr Pool (external link) Lately?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Desertraptor
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,550 posts
Gallery: 212 photos
Likes: 395
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Jul 13, 2007 05:06 |  #30

So far LR 1.1 is not up to par with Raw Shooter which is what Adobe have supposedly incorporated into LR?

Rawshooter is my prefered tool for sharpening


Peter
Canon 6D|60D|40D
Lens 10-22mm f2.8|50mm f 1.8|100mm f2.8 Macro

24-70mm f2.8|L100-400mm f4.5-5.6L
Flash 430EX II
Telescope Skywatcher 600mm ED80 f7.5 GEM EQ3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,138 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
LR 1.1 Sharpening
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1057 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.