From what I have seen so far, you need to use the sliders a lot harder (ie more to the right) than you would traditionally do with USM.... is that a reasonable assumption?
Yes, that is what I am finding also.
Jun 30, 2007 09:25 | #16 EOSAddict wrote in post #3464205 From what I have seen so far, you need to use the sliders a lot harder (ie more to the right) than you would traditionally do with USM.... is that a reasonable assumption? Yes, that is what I am finding also. Bryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StephenMartin Member 186 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2006 Location: Southern California More info | Jun 30, 2007 12:23 | #17 Maybe this is redundant... But as noted in another thread - you can only view the results of sharpening in 1:1 ratio. For me I have found that I can actually oversharpen the image by quite a lot...and there really is some power in this new sharpening tool. (That video tutorial at http://www.layersmagazine.com/category/lightroom/ -Stephen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mnealtx Senior Member 415 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo More info | Jul 03, 2007 16:30 | #18 You can use the little toggle in the upper left portion of the sharpening panel to turn it on/off as well... Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tekkie Goldmember 2,621 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Clarkston, MI More info | Jul 03, 2007 21:34 | #19 it seems to work ok, but compared to photoshop yeah you have to really turn up those sliders Canon 1DMKII, 7D, 5DMKII, 1D MKII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stasber Member 160 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2007 Location: Cork, Ireland More info | I'm a little underwhelmed by the sharpening, maybe it's because I've not 'mastered' it yet but I don't seem to get much satisfaction out of it. I held off from using 1.0 much due to this but I'm still doing basic processing in DPP with stunning sharpening results, then fine tuning/finishing in LR. "David, what musical instrument do you play?" "I play the Hasselblad!" (David Redfern)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
howfly Hatchling 3 posts Joined Jul 2007 More info | Jul 07, 2007 12:39 | #21 EOSAddict wrote in post #3464205 From what I have seen so far, you need to use the sliders a lot harder (ie more to the right) than you would traditionally do with USM.... is that a reasonable assumption? Canon recommends radius 0.3 amount 300% as a starting point for USM for input sharpening in order to restore latent lens sharpness lost in the anti-alias filtering in camera hardware. All of my images get this treatment at the beginning of workflow. If I need to compensate for problems (anti-alias is not a problem), I'll do additional sharpening, but try and avoid it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lord_Malone Cream of the Manpanties........ Inventor Great POTN Photo Book 7,686 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 More info | Jul 07, 2007 23:38 | #22 bcap wrote in post #3450111 Well, now that we have the equivalent (I think?) of USM in Lightroom, what are your thoughts on it? What are you finding for some generic optimal settings? What? When in the hell did this happen? What did I miss? ~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EOSAddict Book Committee Immortal 6,091 posts Likes: 17 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Preston, Lancashire, England More info | Jul 08, 2007 15:33 | #23 |
lowcrust Senior Member 948 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Scandinavia More info | Jul 08, 2007 17:58 | #24 howfly wrote in post #3503035 Canon recommends radius 0.3 amount 300% as a starting point for USM for input sharpening in order to restore latent lens sharpness lost in the anti-alias filtering in camera hardware. All of my images get this treatment at the beginning of workflow. If I need to compensate for problems (anti-alias is not a problem), I'll do additional sharpening, but try and avoid it. Lightroom treats sharpening as a way to correct flaws, and 1.1, although it adds some controls, still doesn't get to Canon recommendations. Forcing workflow through CS2 for input sharpening doesn't make sense. Am I missing something? Certainly don't take my word for it but it seems to me that a 1.0 radius and 150 amount is not the same in LR and PS. ~ BORN FREE - TAXED TO DEATH! ~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 08, 2007 18:06 | #25 PS's USM is not the same as LR's Sharpen. Bryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScottE Goldmember 3,179 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2004 Location: Kelowna, Canada More info | Jul 08, 2007 19:19 | #26 There are two sharpening pre-sets in the left hand pop-up box. One is for portaits and the other for landscapes. I find that using the protrait one for portraits and the landscape for just about everything else gives me a good starting point to work from. The portrait pre-set applies a mask that prevents sharpening of surface defects such as skin blemishes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GlennNK Goldmember 4,630 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Victoria, BC More info | Jul 08, 2007 19:59 | #27 ScottE wrote in post #3509391 There are two sharpening pre-sets in the left hand pop-up box. One is for portaits and the other for landscapes. I find that using the protrait one for portraits and the landscape for just about everything else gives me a good starting point to work from. The portrait pre-set applies a mask that prevents sharpening of surface defects such as skin blemishes.
When did voluptuous become voluminous?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lord_Malone Cream of the Manpanties........ Inventor Great POTN Photo Book 7,686 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 More info | Jul 09, 2007 00:51 | #28 I've been out of the loop for quite a while. ~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kadath Right, Manage This Digit! 1,642 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2004 Location: Navesink, NJ More info | Jul 09, 2007 14:13 | #29 Another new video on sharpening here: Canon 20D, Nikon D300 & assorted stuff...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Desertraptor Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 13, 2007 05:06 | #30 So far LR 1.1 is not up to par with Raw Shooter which is what Adobe have supposedly incorporated into LR? Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1057 guests, 103 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||