howfly wrote in post #3503035
Canon recommends radius 0.3 amount 300% as a starting point for USM for input sharpening in order to restore latent lens sharpness lost in the anti-alias filtering in camera hardware. All of my images get this treatment at the beginning of workflow. If I need to compensate for problems (anti-alias is not a problem), I'll do additional sharpening, but try and avoid it.
Lightroom treats sharpening as a way to correct flaws, and 1.1, although it adds some controls, still doesn't get to Canon recommendations. Forcing workflow through CS2 for input sharpening doesn't make sense.
Am I missing something?
Canon recommends radius 0.3 amount 300% as a starting point for USM for input sharpening in order to restore latent lens sharpness lost in the anti-alias filtering in camera hardware. All of my images get this treatment at the beginning of workflow. If I need to compensate for problems (anti-alias is not a problem), I'll do additional sharpening, but try and avoid it.
Lightroom treats sharpening as a way to correct flaws, and 1.1, although it adds some controls, still doesn't get to Canon recommendations. Forcing workflow through CS2 for input sharpening doesn't make sense.
Am I missing something?
I didn't know that, good info
do you know where canon says this?
