Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 27 Jun 2007 (Wednesday) 17:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

LR 1.1 Sharpening

 
bcap
MR. PP
Avatar
7,364 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Niagara, Ontario
     
Jun 27, 2007 17:25 |  #1

Well, now that we have the equivalent (I think?) of USM in Lightroom, what are your thoughts on it?

What are you finding for some generic optimal settings?


Bryan
Bryan Caporicci's Personal Blog (external link)
Niagara Falls, Ontario Wedding and Portrait Photographer - Bryan Caporicci Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Jun 28, 2007 08:58 |  #2

Anyone?


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOSAddict
Book Committee Immortal
Avatar
6,091 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Preston, Lancashire, England
     
Jun 28, 2007 09:00 |  #3

I'm interested too. As someone who left sharpening at the default setting in both RSP and LR 1.0 and never had an issue, I'm keen to know if I can just leave it as is .... or do I have to tweak it for every image... adding to my workflow time.


Al
My Gear, My Website: www.endofthetrailphoto​graphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Jun 28, 2007 09:01 as a reply to  @ EOSAddict's post |  #4

I haven't even updated yet but my plan is to have presets for various settings and apply them based on each photo. I will likely incorporate some kind of default though to use during Import with my other settings.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Jun 28, 2007 09:09 |  #5

I'm hoping to skip putting my photos into PS just to do the final sharpening, and do everything in LR.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Jun 28, 2007 09:14 |  #6

Anke wrote in post #3453254 (external link)
I'm hoping to skip putting my photos into PS just to do the final sharpening, and do everything in LR.

Yes, me too. Although I believe I read somewhere that the sharpening in Lr is more of a capture sharpening than and output sharpeneing. Has anyone heard anything different? How is it applied during conversion? First or last? Before or after resizing?

I wonder what Kelby has to offer about sharpening in his PDF.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Victoria ­ Bampton
Goldmember
Avatar
1,367 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2007
Location: Southampton, UK
     
Jun 28, 2007 09:40 |  #7

The sharpening in LR, just like ACR, is intended to be Capture Sharpening, as recommended by Bruce Fraser. That said, many people will use it as a one-stop-shop now it has much greater control, and I do the same in many cases (running into Photoshop usually only for huge images, problem images, or really special images).

I can't say for sure, as I've never actually checked, but on the basis that you set your sharpening at 1:1 view, I would assume that the sharpening is applied to the full resolution image before it is then resized, profile converted, and saved as your file format.


Victoria :D
Lightroom Queen website (external link)
Free & Comprehensive Lightroom Books (external link)
Free List of Lightroom Keyboard Shortcuts (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Jun 28, 2007 09:49 |  #8

Presumably too, the numbers used in LR's sharpening tool is not the same as USM in PS. For instance the LR sharpening amount only goes up to 150 and the radius cannot go below 0.5.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcap
THREAD ­ STARTER
MR. PP
Avatar
7,364 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Niagara, Ontario
     
Jun 28, 2007 09:50 |  #9

Anke, I noticed that as well. Radius only goes up to 3 in LR where as USM's radius goes much higher than that.


Bryan
Bryan Caporicci's Personal Blog (external link)
Niagara Falls, Ontario Wedding and Portrait Photographer - Bryan Caporicci Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Victoria ­ Bampton
Goldmember
Avatar
1,367 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2007
Location: Southampton, UK
     
Jun 28, 2007 10:07 |  #10

Not only are the numbers different, but so are the technicalities behind it. So forget any old numbers, and start playing from scratch.


Victoria :D
Lightroom Queen website (external link)
Free & Comprehensive Lightroom Books (external link)
Free List of Lightroom Keyboard Shortcuts (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Jun 28, 2007 10:13 |  #11

Victoria Bampton wrote in post #3453482 (external link)
Not only are the numbers different, but so are the technicalities behind it. So forget any old numbers, and start playing from scratch.

That was my fear. Half of me wants to just wait until someone comes up with some presets and continue to use PS for my sharpening.


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcap
THREAD ­ STARTER
MR. PP
Avatar
7,364 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Niagara, Ontario
     
Jun 28, 2007 10:24 |  #12

Read my mind

Anke wrote in post #3453516 (external link)
That was my fear. Half of me wants to just wait until someone comes up with some presets and continue to use PS for my sharpening.


Bryan
Bryan Caporicci's Personal Blog (external link)
Niagara Falls, Ontario Wedding and Portrait Photographer - Bryan Caporicci Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Jun 28, 2007 10:41 |  #13

Anke wrote in post #3453516 (external link)
That was my fear. Half of me wants to just wait until someone comes up with some presets and continue to use PS for my sharpening.

Ah, where is the fun in that. ;)


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mabas9395
Member
80 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: NW Burbs, IL
     
Jun 28, 2007 11:07 |  #14

In2Photos wrote in post #3453281 (external link)
Although I believe I read somewhere that the sharpening in Lr is more of a capture sharpening than an output sharpening.

Anyone care to help a noob out and explain what this means? The difference between capture sharpening and output sharpening?

I assume that the sharpening required for web output would be different than for a 20x30 print (correct?). But what is the purpose of sharpening during capture if it needs to be re-sharpened for output and how would it be different?

Thanks for your help, hope this wasn't too dumb of a question.


"You only get one sunrise and one sunset a day and you only get so many days on the planet. A good photographer does the math and doesn't waste either." - Galen Rowell

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Jun 28, 2007 11:12 |  #15

mabas9395 wrote in post #3453740 (external link)
Anyone care to help a noob out and explain what this means? The difference between capture sharpening and output sharpening?

I assume that the sharpening required for web output would be different than for a 20x30 print (correct?). But what is the purpose of sharpening during capture if it needs to be re-sharpened for output and how would it be different?

Thanks for your help, hope this wasn't too dumb of a question.

Not a dumb quetion at all.

Capture sharpening is done to eliminate the softness caused by the AA (anti-alias) filter on digital cameras. It is simply to get back what was once taken away.

Ouput sharpening is the last step in your workflow and depening on your output you may apply different amounts or types of sharpening.

More reading (and excellent PS scripts) here:

http://www.thelightsri​ghtstudio.com …onalSharpeningT​oolkit.htm (external link)


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,912 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
LR 1.1 Sharpening
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2687 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.