Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 28 Jun 2007 (Thursday) 13:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why white?

 
Roy ­ Mathers
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,847 posts
Likes: 2908
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Jun 28, 2007 13:01 |  #1

Does anyone know when - and more importantly why - Canon decided to make some of their L series lenses in the now famous off white colour? And why only in the longer focal lengths?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gorby
Senior Member
531 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Jun 28, 2007 13:03 |  #2

And why don't they make white bodies


5D MKII | 650D [SIZE=2][SIZE=2][SIZE=​1]| 350D (RIP)
17-40 f/4L | 70-200 f/4L | 50mm 1.8 | 18-135 STM IS
My work (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
glitch
Member
40 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: England
     
Jun 28, 2007 13:10 |  #3

Roy Mathers wrote in post #3454348 (external link)
Does anyone know when - and more importantly why - Canon decided to make some of their L series lenses in the now famous off white colour? And why only in the longer focal lengths?

Part to show the rest of the watching world that you have a fancy Canon lens, part to reduce the absorption of heat.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SoaringUSAEagle
Daddy Of The Crop
Avatar
10,814 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cheyenne, WY
     
Jun 28, 2007 13:23 |  #4

[QUOTE=glitch;3454394]​...you have a fancy Canon lens...quote]

More like, you have lots of money ;)


5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete ­ W
Goldmember
Avatar
1,328 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 705
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Hilgay, Norfolk. UK
     
Jun 28, 2007 13:24 |  #5

[QUOTE=SoaringUSAEagle​;3454470]

glitch wrote in post #3454394 (external link)
...you have a fancy Canon lens...quote]

More like, you have lots of money ;)

You had a lot of money :)


All the best
Pete Woods LRPS QGP ASINWP
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tall_Paul_2000
Senior Member
919 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: North West, UK
     
Jun 28, 2007 14:10 |  #6

Apparently white disperses heat more effectively than black - although you hardly see Nikon lenses melting on the sidelines during the Olympics......so whilst that may in part be true, i think its also a cunning marketing ploy!


My Gear
My Portfolio and Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
Jun 28, 2007 14:15 |  #7

...I'll go with the "cunning marketing ploy" as well :-)


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jun 28, 2007 14:16 |  #8

Black lenses don't heat up like black lenses and therefore cuts down on optical distortions caused by heat around the lens. Take a Canon 100-400 around at the same time as a Bigma, and see which you want to hand-hold, and how the pictures come out from when the lenses were first used compared to after they have been in the sun for quite some time.

I can speak from experience about the touch issue after sitting in a Colts training camp in 95 deg weather during August with no shade, yeech. Not sure if this is the reason Canon used for the color, but I would rather handle a white lens during a 3 hour shoot in the sun than a black one, so I appreciate it.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,518 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6398
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jun 28, 2007 14:37 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #9

Living in a place with lots of sun , I am not so cynical about Canon using white for the longer lenses. I bought a Silver 400D instead of a black one for that reason.
Mythbusters did a good experiment - 2 identical cars (apart from colour) parked in the sun. The black car got hotter faster and remained hotter through the day by a significant margin compared to the white car.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
midlife_crisis
Member
Avatar
127 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: London
     
Jun 28, 2007 14:50 |  #10

I'm sure it's in the canon EF book, that the lenses are white to reduce heat absorption


Canon 30D, 24-105 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L USM, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM
Gitzo GM2560T, Manfrotto 484RC2
All the gear and no idea

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrrookie
Member
57 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jun 28, 2007 14:53 as a reply to  @ midlife_crisis's post |  #11

The L color is obviously a blatant mac ripoff.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Mathers
THREAD ­ STARTER
I am Spartacus!
Avatar
43,847 posts
Likes: 2908
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Jun 28, 2007 17:13 |  #12

But why only in the longer focal lengths?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jondru
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Jun 28, 2007 17:24 |  #13

I have heard that the white coating is used in lenses that incorporate fluorite elements, which are more prone to being affected by uneven thermal expansion. This would explain the bias to longer focal lengths.

That said, I have not personally checked all the lenses in the lens museum to verify that, but it seems plausible. Gimlet-eyed physics may be the core reason, but I'm sure the marketing side effect is also welcome.

vv
J.O.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Jun 28, 2007 17:34 |  #14

Canon actually advertises the heat expansion properties. Read a magazine once in a while and you'll see the ad.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jondru
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Jun 28, 2007 17:51 |  #15

I did a quick search around the 'net and found some optics and physics references that indicate that not only does fluorite have a markedly different thermal expansion coefficient compared to glass, its refractive index is also strongly temperature dependent.

Two good reasons to take precautions to manage the temperature at least a little in lenses with fluorite elements. Plus it looks cool.

vv
J.O.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,644 views & 0 likes for this thread, 23 members have posted to it.
Why white?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1606 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.