Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 30 Jun 2007 (Saturday) 10:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 "OS" DC Review

 
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jul 01, 2007 00:31 |  #16

10:30pm PST, and I've added quite a bit more to the review.

Jerry, many stores have it in stock. Beach, BuyDig, 17th St, NormanCamera, TriState, Sigma4Less, and Amazon all have it currently. Just FYI.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Jul 01, 2007 02:00 |  #17

Compared to the Canon 17-55 and 70-200, it's not bad, considering this is a 10+ times zoom.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Katzer1
Senior Member
535 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jul 01, 2007 05:28 as a reply to  @ LightRules's post |  #18

Awsome review!
I can't wait for the crops and full size images to come out.

Question #1:
http://www.pbase.com/l​ightrules/image/813920​60 (external link) - is that a crop or a resized image?

Question #2:
Interesting signature and avatar ... care to elaborate ? ;)


Thanks for putting the effort,

Erez


Erez Katz, www.pbase.com/katzer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
farrukh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,969 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Lahore, Pakistan
     
Jul 01, 2007 07:01 |  #19

Lol, you got the correct avatar now :D


5D Mark II + 40D | Lenses: Sigma 150-500mm BigmOS / Canon 24-105mm F4L IS / Canon 70-200 F4L IS / Canon 85mm 1.8 / Sigma Macro 70mm f/2.8 EX / Sigma 10-20mm EX / Canon 50mm f/1.8 II / Sigma 1.4x APO TC / Kenko 2x PRO300 DG. Lighting: Canon 580EX II + Metz 58 AF-1 + Sunpak 383...
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Clean
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,002 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Olympia, Washington
     
Jul 01, 2007 07:33 |  #20

Hey Jojo, that should work on a Mark II shouldn't it? I'd imagine it won't vignette since the 10-20 doesn't after about 12mm.


Mike
some shots @ Zenfolio (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jul 01, 2007 10:13 |  #21

Katzer1 wrote in post #3468018 (external link)
Awsome review!
I can't wait for the crops and full size images to come out.

Question #1:
http://www.pbase.com/l​ightrules/image/813920​60 (external link) - is that a crop or a resized image?

100% center crop

Question #2:
Interesting signature and avatar ... care to elaborate ? ;)

Hmmmmm? :lol:
Erez

farrukh wrote in post #3468210 (external link)
Lol, you got the correct avatar now :D

:D

Mr. Clean wrote in post #3468263 (external link)
Hey Jojo, that should work on a Mark II shouldn't it? I'd imagine it won't vignette since the 10-20 doesn't after about 12mm.

Yeh Mike, it'll physically mount to any body. I don't know where it'll vignette on either 1.3x or FF bodies, but it'll work. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Katzer1
Senior Member
535 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jul 01, 2007 12:53 |  #22

Jojo, any chance for a test shot with a 1.4 tc ?
according to this (external link) the nikon 18-200vr handles them reasonably, would be interesting to find out how this lens fares in comparison....

Erez


Erez Katz, www.pbase.com/katzer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gizmata
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jul 01, 2007 13:36 |  #23

I got this lens last week and have not used it much yet.

My one issue so far is the zoom mechanism is nice as long as you keep moving at a decent rate. In the 50-80mm range it tends to be pretty sticky and "pushing" through it can feel very hard. If I back off a bit and then a "moving start" it goes smoothly through the range.

Sorry I don't have any pictures to post (not like you really want to see the window screens I tested on and gave myself a headache looking at :) ). I took some flash pictures of the window screen and compared it to my 70-200 f4L IS with the same settings and IS/OS on. They both looked pretty good, but the corners were not as sharp on the Sigma. The squares were bigger at "200" on the 70-200, but not by much.

I am not an expert though, just my $0.02.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jul 01, 2007 16:00 |  #24

Katzer1 wrote in post #3469400 (external link)
any chance for a test shot with a 1.4 tc?

We're talking about a 280mm f9 lens now :rolleyes: :lol:

I'll appease you and try to test it out and report back later. Don't expect too much. AF will probably be an issue too. :cry: But we'll see.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cicopo
Goldmember
Avatar
3,702 posts
Gallery: 248 photos
Likes: 1389
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ont, Canada
     
Jul 01, 2007 16:59 |  #25

This will show what the non OS version does on my 1D2n, it's at 88 mm, and you need to get past there for clean corners.
http://links.pictures.​aol.com …2MoS1KswEovnZas​AP*&size=l (external link)

Forget about it on a FF body, like shooting through a pipe.


A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
z3speed4me
Senior Member
253 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Jul 01, 2007 23:25 |  #26

LightRules wrote in post #3470077 (external link)
We're talking about a 280mm f9 lens now :rolleyes: :lol:

well the 3 stops will help at least a little bit there...


7D | Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS | 70-200 f/4 L | 50 f1.4 | Sigma 30 f1.4 | Tamron 10-24

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jul 01, 2007 23:34 |  #27

z3speed4me wrote in post #3472008 (external link)
well the 3 stops will help at least a little bit there...

3 stops? I can do 3 stops in my sleep, or when waiving bye to friends. :evil: With decent breathing and practice and patience and allowing the OS to optimize (1 second after pressing shutter halfway), 4-5 stops is more like it. Here's a 100% center crop at almost 5 stops gain (320mm FOV, f6.3 wide open, 1/15th) :D

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jul 01, 2007 23:39 |  #28

Ya know, I really, really hate you. You do a better job at separating me from my money than women do...


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jul 01, 2007 23:42 |  #29

Tony-S wrote in post #3472080 (external link)
Ya know, I really, really hate you. You do a better job at separating me from my money than women do...

You know what, Tony. At some point, we folks really need to take responsibility for our choices and actions and simply own up to the fact that, well, we're just not very good lovers. Don't hate the player, hate the game! :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jul 01, 2007 23:48 |  #30

LightRules wrote in post #3472089 (external link)
You know what, Tony. At some point, we folks really need to take responsibility for our choices and actions and simply own up to the fact that, well, we're just not very good lovers. Don't hate the player, hate the game! :D

This photo business is like a mistress, except my wife is ok with her (well, except for the money). :)

I'm hoping to recoup some of my loss. If I can only get rid of the 28-105 and the non-OS 18-200, I'll be in pretty good shape.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

38,010 views & 0 likes for this thread, 46 members have posted to it.
Sigma 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 "OS" DC Review
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1096 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.