Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 06 Jun 2004 (Sunday) 07:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Considered sharp for 10D? (Focusing problems in 10D)

 
AA
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Jun 06, 2004 07:54 |  #1

I have been reading a lot about focusing problems in 10D. I just switched from Nikon FM 2 to 10D. I'm not very satisfied with the results.

Just wondering if the picture below is considered sharp or not. Or I should bring it for service as what has been done by sgregory (Focusing problems in 10D).

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pekka
El General Moderator
Avatar
18,396 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 2531
Joined Mar 2001
Location: Hellsinki, Finland
     
Jun 06, 2004 08:04 |  #2

Please post original size photo with EXIF information, and info how your have post-processed it.


The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
AMASS 2.5 Changelog (installed here now)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Jun 06, 2004 08:10 |  #3

All digital photos, particularly those produced by a CMOS chip and AA filter, need some form of sharpening. As Pekka stated, without knowing what you did before/during and after the shot, it's impossible to tell. Part of the problem in evaluating that picture is lack of contrast. It's pretty dark. An adjustment in levels would help.
Regards,
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 06, 2004 10:39 |  #4

In the "Top tips" sticky thread.. on the second page there is a link here;
https://photography-on-the.net …topic.php?p=213​493#213493

which covers the spteps one can take oif they are concerned that there camera is focusing incorrectly...

:)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,312 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
     
Jun 06, 2004 10:41 |  #5

Yes, you have to sharpen.. Pictures directly out of the 10D tend to be a little soft. It's a common complaint. Also, you don't say what lens you're using. The lens is perhaps THE most important component when it comes to picture quality.

If you don't want to post process, try increase the in-camera sharpening... But as Pekka says.. You'll have to provide more information and a link to a full sized image..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
droosan
Member
200 posts
Joined Jul 2002
     
Jun 06, 2004 16:16 |  #6

AA wrote:
I have been reading a lot about focusing problems in 10D. I just switched from Nikon FM 2 to 10D. I'm not very satisfied with the results.

Just wondering if the picture below is considered sharp or not. Or I should bring it for service as what has been done by sgregory (Focusing problems in 10D).

What was the lens, the aperture, and the speed? You have a surprisingly large DOF, which makes me think you had a small aperture, which makes me wonder about whether diffusion and camera shake are issues. If your lens was a long zoom, (especially at f/11 or so...) you probably not going to get top sharpness except with a tripod, or in strong sun.

Yes, and you'll probably need to digitally sharpen too, depending on what you're doing with the picture.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AA
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Jun 06, 2004 17:32 |  #7

I'm so very new with this digital camera.

There is no post-processing.

The lens is EF28-135 3.5-5.6 IS.

I think I lost the rest of the information.

Thank you for everybody's input.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SlickStreet16
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined May 2004
     
Jun 06, 2004 19:44 |  #8

AA wrote:
I think I lost the rest of the information.

AA,

You should be able to see the EXIF info as follows:

Open the picture on your hard drive and right click on it. Then click Properties, and click the Summary tab. The info should be there.

Find the shutter speed, aperture, ISO and focal length that the picture was taken at.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Florsheim
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Jun 2004
     
Jun 07, 2004 06:47 |  #9

Their is either something wrong with your camera or you are not focusing right because that photograph should be much sharper. I do get very sharp photographs with my 10D, but you can focus wrong as we all do at times.

Tom




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Jun 07, 2004 07:12 |  #10

AA wrote:
There is no post-processing.

That is why that photo is not sharp. Almost ALL photos that come out of any dSLR need post-processing if you expect them to be razor sharp. That photo would be easily processed to show great detail, contrast, brightness and resulting sharpness in about 30 seconds.

These are not point and shooters people.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris1le
Senior Member
Avatar
891 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
     
Jun 07, 2004 11:49 |  #11

That photo would be easily processed to show great detail, contrast, brightness and resulting sharpness in about 30 seconds.

Hope you don't mind but I did this in just over 30 seconds :lol: to show that most all DSLR images need some kind of processing. For the most part levels and sharpening are all that are required. Others images will need more processing. The focus looks good. The image is a little underexposed but levels helped out there.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

My Pictures (external link) : My Gear (external link)
I Reject Your Reality And Substitute My Own - Adam Savage

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scotty ­ G
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Mar 2004
     
Jun 07, 2004 16:03 |  #12

PARAMETERS!

If you do not want to sharpen in PS then go to the menu, choose parmeters and bump the sharpness up as far as you can.

The 10D will then take very nice sharp pictures right out of the camera.

Good Luck

Scotty




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mxer82
Member
37 posts
Joined May 2004
     
Jun 07, 2004 17:34 |  #13

Why does Canon leave the settings so that they need to be sharpened out of the box? It is kinda dissapointing to have to mess with pictures with a 1-5 thousand dollar camera! Just curious.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sendide
Senior Member
305 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
Jun 07, 2004 17:39 |  #14

Besides all what was well said, I think that there is no focusing problem with your camera according to the picture you posted. Some 10Ds did come with front or back focusing problems, but it were your case, we could 've seen shaprer back or front (I assume you focused on the bird)which both look more blurry in the post. since the bird looks the sharpest part of the picutre, as the folks said, increase sharpning in camera setting or after the shot in any appropriate software.
regards
Khalid




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cmM
Goldmember
Avatar
5,705 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Chicago / San Francisco
     
Jun 07, 2004 17:41 |  #15

mxer82 wrote:
Why does Canon leave the settings so that they need to be sharpened out of the box? It is kinda dissapointing to have to mess with pictures with a 1-5 thousand dollar camera! Just curious.

You can always set the camera to automatically sharpen....

But not everyone wants sharp pictures all the time, and you have more control over the image in PS (or any other image editing software)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,174 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Considered sharp for 10D? (Focusing problems in 10D)
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2471 guests, 106 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.