Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 01 Jul 2007 (Sunday) 12:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Rotating-- degrades image quality

 
gorby
Senior Member
531 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Jul 01, 2007 12:25 |  #1

If I'm not mistaken, doesn't rotating an image in photoshop (or anything else for that matter) degrade IQ slightly. Yet you see it done all the time, to fix crooked horizons among other things.

I'm just wondering what the thoughts are on this, considering everyone is always flapping on about "is this lens sharp?", "is this sharp?"-- yet I do see a bit of a degrade when rotation is used (pixel peeping my own images at 100%)


5D MKII | 650D [SIZE=2][SIZE=2][SIZE=​1]| 350D (RIP)
17-40 f/4L | 70-200 f/4L | 50mm 1.8 | 18-135 STM IS
My work (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Beau ­ Hudspeth
-Cool Title-
Avatar
2,926 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 758
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Saint Helens, Oregon
     
Jul 01, 2007 12:32 |  #2

I always do my best to shoot the image straight the first time in order to keep from rotating it later in PP - and from what I have seen, you are correct. The image gets resampled and you do lose some detail.

But you have to think about it this way: how am I going to use the shot?

If it is for a large print, then it is best to shoot it right from the start.
If your going to display it on the web, it is not big deal since you will have to greatly reduce the final size anyway, which also resamples it.

Just ad the correct amount of sharpening, when all is said and done, and you should not be able to see that any rotation has occurred.


_______________
Follow My PIX-EDC IG Page (external link)Gear List

_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gorby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
531 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Jul 01, 2007 13:50 |  #3

No, no, I agree with of course, if you are using for web, then big deal.

But I'm just wondering-- if we are to go a long with the 'sharp obsession' line of thinking that you see, how come no one bats an eye with rotating?


By the way there should've been a "?" in the thread title, I was sure I put one there!


5D MKII | 650D [SIZE=2][SIZE=2][SIZE=​1]| 350D (RIP)
17-40 f/4L | 70-200 f/4L | 50mm 1.8 | 18-135 STM IS
My work (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Beau ­ Hudspeth
-Cool Title-
Avatar
2,926 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 758
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Saint Helens, Oregon
     
Jul 01, 2007 14:58 |  #4

gorby wrote in post #3469647 (external link)
... if we are to go a long with the 'sharp obsession' line of thinking that you see, how come no one bats an eye with rotating?

I think that that is because: if you rotate, loss of image sharpness is just one of the things that comes with the process and is unavoidable - so why sweat it. And, as I said, it depends on the images use and also the style of the image.

If it does not need super-fine sharpness, but artistically it benefits greatly from the rotation, then the artistic quality wins over ultra-fine image detail.

It comes down to: if the shot was not spot-on in rotation on the original, what are you willing to live with to get the end result?


_______________
Follow My PIX-EDC IG Page (external link)Gear List

_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

754 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Rotating-- degrades image quality
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2714 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.