Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
Thread started 01 Jul 2007 (Sunday) 15:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

135 F2 for Macro.

 
cookie99
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
Jul 01, 2007 15:47 |  #1

My first attempt at Macro with my 135 F2.

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/cookie99/IMG_0853cr.jpg

Chris Cooke "Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni"
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eccles
Goldmember
Avatar
2,948 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Bristol, UK
     
Jul 01, 2007 16:02 |  #2

A nice set piece but I wonder why there's so much noise on a static subject.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookie99
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
Jul 01, 2007 17:08 as a reply to  @ eccles's post |  #3

A nice set piece but I wonder why there's so much noise on a static subject.

Any advice greatfully accepted as I am VERY new to macro work.

Shot was 135 F2l at 125 sec. iso 100 hand held with some wind and UV filter on the lens taken at f2.8

Could shallow DOF have been a problem or too much crop?


Chris Cooke "Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni"
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Roberts
revolting peasant
Avatar
3,079 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Jul 01, 2007 17:29 |  #4

Actually I'm surprised at the amount of noise too, I can see from the Exif data that it was taken at 1/125th @ f/2.8 and ISO 100. I'm certainly no macro expert.

You didn't by any chance find that it was under-exposed and then tweak it in photoshop? As that could explain the noise somewhat. You're usually better over-exposing and pulling it back, although I suppose that's a pretty daft statement as the best bet is to get the exposure spot on in camera :lol: Other than that I've no idea. I do like the picture though.

cheers
Bill


BiLL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookie99
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
Jul 01, 2007 18:00 |  #5

Thanks Bill.

I did underexpose it and I did lighten it up in PS.

In future I will do as you suggest and err on the OVER expose side.

Cheers
Chris


Chris Cooke "Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni"
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racketman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,936 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 2480
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Richmond Surrey
     
Jul 01, 2007 18:45 |  #6

noisy but nice.


Toby
Canon EOS R7, 100 L macro, MP-E65, RF 100-400
Olympus EM-1 MKII/MKIII, 60 macro, 90 macro, 12-40 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpastern
Cream of the Crop
13,765 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
     
Jul 01, 2007 20:31 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

Not a bad shot at all, but as the others have said, noisy. If you underexpose a shot and rescue it (either via DPP or in Photoshop), you'll add more noise to the image. You could try something like Neat Image to help clean the noise up.

Dave


http://www.macro-images.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookie99
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
Jul 01, 2007 20:41 as a reply to  @ dpastern's post |  #8

Thanks again Dave I will get it and try, the advice here is priceless.

Cheers
Chris


Chris Cooke "Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni"
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mrvile
Senior Member
Avatar
541 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Cleveland, OH
     
Jul 01, 2007 22:03 |  #9

Here's an attempt to clean it up. I had to resize it a little and I used Photoshop's reduce-noise filter instead of Neat Image (I already had PS up and I'm too lazy to load up Neat Image) but it actually doesn't look too bad. Loses a little detail but, being a flower shot, that doesn't matter that much.

IMAGE: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a214/Mrvile/noisyflower.jpg

Eric
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cookie99
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
482 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne Australia
     
Jul 02, 2007 00:25 as a reply to  @ Mrvile's post |  #10

Thanks MrVile, I am fairly new to photoshop as well and the help I have been getting here beats the hell out of their "Help" menu.

I will try that shot again with the 100 Macro lens and MR-14EX ring light.


Chris Cooke "Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni"
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeavingTheCandy
Member
37 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Mar 01, 2010 20:13 |  #11

Just got a 135/f2. What an awesome piece of glass!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
orionmystery
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,078 posts
Likes: 771
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Malaysia
     
Mar 01, 2010 20:46 |  #12

The edited version is very nice :)


Kurt
Malaysia & Borneo herping/macro tours:
http://www.orionherpad​venture.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,313 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
135 F2 for Macro.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1077 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.