everyone has their own opinion at what they think YOU should get... but it comes down to what you want to shoot and whose opinion you trust the most
naqs Goldmember 1,814 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | Jul 04, 2007 23:45 | #31 everyone has their own opinion at what they think YOU should get... but it comes down to what you want to shoot and whose opinion you trust the most Nathan[I][SIZE=1] [CENTER]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 05, 2007 00:39 | #32 jkoc wrote in post #3488661 i'd say 17-55mm f2.8IS + 70-200mm f4L IS Same but if you have the $$, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS Aloha,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 05, 2007 01:13 | #33 Wow! Thank you to everyone who posted. I really do appreciate your time and opinions, your all professionals in my book. With everyones recommendations I feel confident I can make a comfortable decision now. I'll let everyone know what I decide on. Thanks again. You don't know how much help you all were.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 05, 2007 01:20 | #34 CARVER.....I have the 28-135mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Caster Senior Member 271 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Jul 05, 2007 02:12 | #35 Budget: Sigma 17-70 F/2.8-4 (I think) or Sigma 18-50 F/2.8 + Canon 70-200 F/4 L Canon Rebel XT 350D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sootyvrs Senior Member 924 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: UK More info | Jul 05, 2007 04:08 | #36 greg250 wrote in post #3489159 CARVER.....I have the 28-135mm If you already have this lens why not go for - Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MaDProFF Goldmember 4,369 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: East Sussex, UK More info | Jul 05, 2007 04:31 | #37 For most fun, 10-22mm efs, and then the EF 24-105 F4 Photographic Images on Brett Butler
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I'd go with the 17-55 f2.8 IS and the 70-200 f2.8 IS EOS 350D + Kit 18-55 lens (looking to donate) , EOS 30D 18-270 Tamron (wife's), 7D MkII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
austincabot Goldmember 1,090 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Atlanta More info | Jul 05, 2007 09:47 | #39 I just bought the 24-105 f/4 IS L and the 70-200 f/4 L and couldn't be happier. The 24-105 is the perfect walk around lens. I used a 24-70 for a while and was always wishing I had a little extra length. I love them both, though to do miss the DOF the f/2.8 gave me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnJ80 Cream of the Crop 5,442 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2006 More info | Jul 05, 2007 09:48 | #40 greg250 wrote in post #3487650 I just purchased a Canon 30D. Could you guys give me your opinion on which 2 lenses I should start with. There are so many choices and I know it depends on what you are shooting and trying to accomplish with your photography. I still have a lot to learn but I need to start with something. Your help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks The best two lens setup I know for a 1.6x crop camera is Obsessive Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
austincabot Goldmember 1,090 posts Joined Dec 2006 Location: Atlanta More info | Jul 05, 2007 09:50 | #41 JohnJ80 wrote in post #3490775 The best two lens setup I know for a 1.6x crop camera is 17-40 f/4L 70-200 f/4L IS (or without IS). This is a fantastic setup that will keep you busy for hours. J Thats what this guy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Carver Mostly Lurking 17 posts Joined Jul 2007 More info | Jul 05, 2007 10:12 | #42 That's why I asked. Because I know the kit lens for the 30D these days is the 28-135 which gives you a pretty good range and is a pretty good lens. Not the best but if you look at the thread with the photos from it, you'll see it's pretty good. I like it a lot. I can't say I love it as much as my 85mm 1.8 but it gets more use because it's more versatile. ~ Veronica
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Madweasel Cream of the Crop 6,224 posts Likes: 61 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Fareham, UK More info | Jul 05, 2007 13:38 | #43 JohnJ80 wrote in post #3490775 The best two lens setup I know for a 1.6x crop camera is 17-40 f/4L 70-200 f/4L IS (or without IS). This is a fantastic setup that will keep you busy for hours. J Couldn't agree more. I entered the world of Canon digital photography with a 30D with 17-40L and 70-200/4L. A very solid set-up. Mark.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimAskew Cream of the Crop More info | 17-55MM EF-S IS and the 70-200MM f/4 EF L. These are about $1,650 total. Then start saving for a 10-22MM EF-S Jim -- I keep the Leica D-Lux 7 in the Glove Box just in case!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Chrisedge Member 101 posts Joined Jun 2006 More info | Jul 05, 2007 15:50 | #45 17-55mm 2.8 IS and the 70-200mm 2.8 IS What I use? A 350D and 17-55mm f/2.8 IS, 99% of the time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1213 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||