Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Forum FAQ and Information Forum Talk 
Thread started 05 Jul 2007 (Thursday) 20:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Kids \ Adults Sub-forum

 
DiscoLizard
Tinkerbell asking for trouble
Avatar
1,391 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: New Zealand
     
Jul 05, 2007 20:09 |  #1

I was just wondering if there had ever been any consideration into splitting this sub-forum into some sort of age-defined categories.

A 0-18 and a 18+ for example.

I don't mean in a G&N type of way, just that I often come in here to check out people's ideas/treatments on adults, and then I usually wind up going through a lot of kids photos before finding what I'm looking for.

I understand that a lot of people want to see photos of kids, just as much as I want to see photos of adults - I was just wondering if there were any way to actually see specifically the model age that you're looking for?

I may be way off base here, so I'd be interested to hear people's thoughts...


When a dumb kiwi #$ick nicks the ball through the slips,
that's Parore!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Jul 05, 2007 20:21 |  #2

Send a note to the moderators... ;) Good idea though... People is somewhat general, but then you would have to divide sports into football, soccer, hockey, etc...


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DiscoLizard
THREAD ­ STARTER
Tinkerbell asking for trouble
Avatar
1,391 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: New Zealand
     
Jul 05, 2007 20:24 |  #3

I sort of agree, but in the titles of the threads in the sports forum, they usually let you know what's in the thread.

In the people forum, it tends to be along the lines of: "Photos I took of Kristy" - which is less informative :(


When a dumb kiwi #$ick nicks the ball through the slips,
that's Parore!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScubaGuy19
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: South Florida
     
Jul 05, 2007 21:37 as a reply to  @ DiscoLizard's post |  #4

My thoughts exactly.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=344588




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DiscoLizard
THREAD ­ STARTER
Tinkerbell asking for trouble
Avatar
1,391 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: New Zealand
     
Jul 05, 2007 21:44 |  #5

Good to know I'm not the only one :)


When a dumb kiwi #$ick nicks the ball through the slips,
that's Parore!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcw122
Goldmember
Avatar
1,940 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
     
Jul 05, 2007 22:52 |  #6

I strongly agree (see my post in the Forum Feedback thread).


"Ill show you."-John Hammond
Gear List
:D "YES! I AM INVINSIBLE!"-Boris

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DiscoLizard
THREAD ­ STARTER
Tinkerbell asking for trouble
Avatar
1,391 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: New Zealand
     
Jul 12, 2007 23:06 |  #7

See, there are now a lot of people posting "People" shots into the G&N forum, which are neither Glam or Nude.


When a dumb kiwi #$ick nicks the ball through the slips,
that's Parore!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
::John::
Cream of the Crop
8,644 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 364
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Canberra, Australia
     
Jul 13, 2007 00:28 |  #8

Yeah - they 'want the advice' of the glamour shooters so they can improve their techniques.

There seems to be an awful lot of them, too. :rolleyes:


I am the proud owner of the Peleng 8mm Fisheye lens

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tommykjensen
Cream of the Crop
21,013 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 260
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
     
Jul 13, 2007 01:19 |  #9

DiscoLizard wrote in post #3493955 (external link)
I was just wondering if there had ever been any consideration into splitting this sub-forum into some sort of age-defined categories.

A 0-18 and a 18+ for example.

Just a question. How is moderators going to determine the age of the people on the photos in order to move the thread to the correct foum (I doubt I will be able to tell the difference between a 17 year old and 19 year old, how many can do that without)? And what if the photo has both adults and kids in it ? Then were should it go ?


EDITING OF MY PHOTOS IS NOT ALLOWED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Jul 13, 2007 01:25 |  #10

How about a crummy, boring family snapshot section :-)

Seriously, kid shots can be good and adult shots can be bad ... all depends. Impossible to filter what is worth a look.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DiscoLizard
THREAD ­ STARTER
Tinkerbell asking for trouble
Avatar
1,391 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: New Zealand
     
Jul 14, 2007 18:27 |  #11

tommykjensen wrote in post #3536261 (external link)
Just a question. How is moderators going to determine the age of the people on the photos in order to move the thread to the correct foum (I doubt I will be able to tell the difference between a 17 year old and 19 year old, how many can do that without)? And what if the photo has both adults and kids in it ? Then were should it go ?

It's pretty easy actually - just make a guideline that people should put the age of their subject in the thread title. Much like the Sports section puts "Football - 8 shots" or "Baseball - my first outing with my new lens". That way the moderators don't have to do anything.

Guideline: Please describe the subject of the photo(s) in the thread title, and include the approx age (adults/kids/teens/mix​ed is sufficient).

condyk wrote in post #3536282 (external link)
How about a crummy, boring family snapshot section :-)

Seriously, kid shots can be good and adult shots can be bad ... all depends. Impossible to filter what is worth a look.

Sure, I agree there are always going to be shots with more artistic merit than others - I wasn't advocating that some sort of nefarious "quality" standard be applied.


When a dumb kiwi #$ick nicks the ball through the slips,
that's Parore!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,882 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Kids \ Adults Sub-forum
FORUMS Forum FAQ and Information Forum Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1472 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.