Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 06 Jul 2007 (Friday) 15:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

should I get 4G of RAM

 
bowlesbe
Senior Member
500 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jul 06, 2007 15:37 |  #1

I currently have 2 G of RAM.

Im loking for ways to improve lightroom, which I love.. . another 2 G of RAM is stupidly cheap these days and I have two slots open on my motherboard...

would it make a difference? Would windows even see / use the extra RAM?
Does it matter if I have 32 or 64 bit Windows?


*the perfect crop setup*
30d / 10-22 / 17-50 / 60 macro / 70-300 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mkuriger
Goldmember
Avatar
1,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2007
Location: Valencia, California
     
Jul 06, 2007 15:46 |  #2

a single program or process can only address 2 gb of RAM on a 32 bit operating system, and it's even less with wondows. however, seeing as how the OS is eating up a good chuck of ram itself, adding more ram couldn't hurt!


Michael Kuriger
My Myspace (external link)
ikekuriger@gmail.com (external link)
Canon 5D Mark II | Canon 30D | Canon 17-55mm F2.8 IS | Canon 70-200mm F4L | Canon 24-70mm F2.8L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zepher
Goldmember
Avatar
1,626 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Norfolk,VA
     
Jul 06, 2007 16:16 |  #3

Go for it.
XP Pro 32bit shows 3.5gigs of memory available with 4gigs installed. 64bit might show all of it, I don't know as I haven't installed 64bit on any machine.
Vista should show all 4gigs available.


Manny Desantos
Intel C2Q Q6600 3.06Ghz, 8GB Ram, 8.1TB, XFX HD5850, Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, PS CS4 EXT (external link)

Canon 40D, EF 28-70L, 2x Canon XH-A1 HDV, Canon HV30 HDV
❶_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
luukie
Member
101 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
     
Jul 06, 2007 16:39 |  #4

all 32bit OS won't show the full 4GB, only 64bit OS will allow you to use the full 4GB.


400D, Canon 70-200 f4, Tamron 17-50 f2.8, Canon 50 f1.4, 580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bowlesbe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
500 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jul 06, 2007 17:32 as a reply to  @ luukie's post |  #5

Does the 32 bit / 64 bit windows operating system difference make a difference for the RAM that is available? Ie does it change how the RAM is used, or just how much CAN be used? It might be worth getting 64 bit windows if I am so inclined to increase the amount of RAM...


*the perfect crop setup*
30d / 10-22 / 17-50 / 60 macro / 70-300 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
luukie
Member
101 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
     
Jul 06, 2007 17:39 |  #6

To be honest, i don't know. I think it doens't really make a difference how the memory is used in the 32bit vs. 64bit. Although you would think that they would optimize it in a way for the 64bit right? One thing i do know is that you won't be able to use the 4GB in a 32bit environment, so that kinda answers the question too right? :)
Why don't you state what your computer specs are and maybe there's another way to improve your computer's performance.


400D, Canon 70-200 f4, Tamron 17-50 f2.8, Canon 50 f1.4, 580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jul 06, 2007 20:56 |  #7

bowlesbe wrote in post #3499162 (external link)
Does the 32 bit / 64 bit windows operating system difference make a difference for the RAM that is available? Ie does it change how the RAM is used, or just how much CAN be used? It might be worth getting 64 bit windows if I am so inclined to increase the amount of RAM...

Photoshop is 32-bit only and I suspect, but do not know for certain, that Lightroom is as well. It wouldn't do any good to use a 64-bit OS for apps that can only do 32 bit addressing. Of course, it might speed up other 64-bit tasks and that might result in some performance enhancement, but I don't know how significant it would be.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonphotog
Senior Member
796 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Texas (Greater San Antonio Area)
     
Jul 06, 2007 22:40 |  #8

64-bit Operating systems usually run 32-bit applications just fine.

you have add the /3gb switch to your boot.ini file if you put over 3gb in your 32-bit system.

In addition, whether or not you will benefit from 2gb of additional ram depends on your motherboard chipset, CPU, the type of ram you are currently running and the memory timings of the ram. It also often is affected by whether or not each ram stick is the same build and revision.

I bought two gig of DDR ram in a matched set to add to a system that already had 1gig of DDR ram in a matched set. While I'm able to run all 3gb in the system, the memory bandwidth is cut to less than half of what it is with just the 2gb installed.

So I'm running on the 2gb only until I have time to do more testing.

Bottom line, while everyone is talking about how much memory Photoshop needs to run optimally, Adobes site has some interesting info regarding that in the support section. You should go there and take a look.

Before buying any additional ram for your system do some research on your components and look specifically for information on what happens to the ram on your motherboard if you populate more than two slots, particularly if you are using dual data rate ram.


-Ken
Gear List|Kenny D. Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonphotog
Senior Member
796 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Texas (Greater San Antonio Area)
     
Jul 07, 2007 00:58 |  #9

For more info about CS2 on a 64-bit system and ram usage on both 32-bit & 64-bit systems Look Here (external link).


-Ken
Gear List|Kenny D. Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bowlesbe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
500 posts
Joined Jan 2007
     
Jul 07, 2007 12:59 as a reply to  @ canonphotog's post |  #10

Unless anyone has further insight:

I am using:

core 2 duo 2.13mhz supported by a asus motherboard (p5b; chipset 775)

2 500GB disks set up with two RAID partitions. RAID 0 (35GB) for windows and apps), RAID 1 (~450GB) for photos. This way I get secure storage for critical data and a faster partition for programs. (Although to be honest, not sure if I notice the increased speed fo the RAID 0).

Found it interesting though cuz the site recommended above says that the cs2 scratch disk should be a RAID 0 partition for fastest performance, yet it ALSO says it should be different from the windows paging file (which it isnt, in my case).

I also have 2 gigs of RAM... and 2 open slots... trying to figure out whether to populate them...

I am still confused about this 64 bit business... and whether I should learn more about it. Its interesting the that Mac Pro's seem to use exclusively Xeon 64 bit processors... i wonder why that is.


*the perfect crop setup*
30d / 10-22 / 17-50 / 60 macro / 70-300 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonphotog
Senior Member
796 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Texas (Greater San Antonio Area)
     
Jul 07, 2007 16:34 |  #11

Further insight in the P5B motherboard can be found here (external link) at Corsairs support forums.

I don't think you will find an answer you like.

Example. I'm running an Athlon 64 4000+ CPU. I ran memtest on the system with 2gb of TwinX3200-C2PT with memory timings set at 2-2-2-5 and 2T disable in bios. Everything is fine. SiSandra and Everest Home edition benchmark the memory bandwidth in the ~6000 MB/s range.

When adding 1gb of TwinX3200-XLPT into the system (yep, you got it, populating all four memory slots) the memory bandwidth is knocked down to a little over 2800 MB/s.

Memtest reports different numbers for memory bandwidth than SiSandra and Everest but still shows the same basic bandwidth hit.

CPU-Z adds some useful detail to the help sort out what happened.

While running 2gb of match pair DDR ram at 2-2-2-5-1T, the ram bus is 200MHz x 2 for 400MHz. After adding the original gig back into the system at 2-2-2-5, the bios/cpu controller set 1T to 2T and halved the Mhz of the ram so I am 3gb running stable but without the speed of 2gb alone.

So the question really is..., Will you see a performance gain in CS2/CS3 with the additional ram operating at a lower bandwidth or not?

Reading/writing Ram is still far faster than reading/writing a scratch disk.

Haven't set a test up for batch post processing to check the two different ram configs so at this point I don't know definitively what the answer is.

Ken


-Ken
Gear List|Kenny D. Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,177 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
should I get 4G of RAM
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1207 guests, 182 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.