Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 09 Jul 2007 (Monday) 10:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Correcting Casual Wedding Photos

 
bwolford
Goldmember
Avatar
3,705 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida
     
Jul 09, 2007 10:34 |  #1

I took casual wedding shots (external link) in a mixed lighting environment. I thought I could overcome / overpower the ambient lighting in the lobby area of the hotel by leveraging the LARGE picture windows to my back in the images in the link. As you can see, I was incorrect and I could be faced with a series of dud photos.

I know I can mask the background separately from the people in the image and process them with various layers, but I anticipate many hours per photo to try and save as many of these as possible. Before I chalk this up to being a (or many) lesson learned (don't mix your lighting and use appropriate supplemental lighting, studio or flash heads to properly light your subject), I thought I'd reach out here for any possible miracles/suggestions. Any thoughts on how to salvage? I was considering taking the background black and white and focusing on the bride and groom for any PP.

Fortunately, I was NOT the prime or official wedding photographer. Saving a family relationship is NOT dependent on a miracle. Just trying to help a bride and groom in the family, on a budget. I was just a family member taking some shots at their request before we took for for the wedding on the beach and shots by the pros...

All images shot RAW.

Laughing at the rank amature is allowed, but kindly keep it to yourselves or, at least, to a minimum. :D Hopefully, if I can't salvage them, someone else may learn from my mistake(s). I am off to the lighting forum to ask how these kinds of setups should be managed...


Brice
Gear List
Sample Gallery (external link)http://thewolfords.com​/2007XmasProofs (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dchemist
Goldmember
1,632 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Woodbury, Connecticut
     
Jul 09, 2007 12:15 |  #2

I looked at your photos and most seem to me to be decent. I think you did a nice job and the couple will welcome a copy of yuor images. There are a couple backlit but you should be able to bring the faces out with a curves adjustment. Good luck, Dennis


POTN Book Vol4 Astronomy Image Manager and BC Member
20D, 5DMkII, 50F1.4, 100F2.8 macro, 135F2, 17-40F4, 70-200F2.8, 24-105F4, 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bwolford
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,705 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida
     
Jul 09, 2007 13:06 as a reply to  @ Dchemist's post |  #3

Unfortunately the first few were just as you described and I really shouldn't expect anyone to look at most of the images before commenting. I was most interested in the wedding party images.

Here are some before and after photos of a technique using Hue Saturation layer and a mask based on one of the color channels, inverted...

Before:

IMAGE: http://thewolfords.com/POTN/EdandSonya046before.jpg

After:
IMAGE: http://thewolfords.com/POTN/EdandSonya046.jpg

I think the After image appears a bit "rosey."

Thanks for your comments and suggestions.

Brice
Gear List
Sample Gallery (external link)http://thewolfords.com​/2007XmasProofs (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dekalbSTEEL
Goldmember
Avatar
1,793 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: NIU town, USA
     
Jul 09, 2007 20:01 |  #4

3 things

1. If you shot in RAW, couldn't you make white balance adjustments using the color temperature slider to get them to a good starting point to convert to jpeg?

2. Only you will know what the correct skin tones are for this group of people, because only you know what they really look like.

3. In regards to the one photo above, it looks like you clipped his left hand. A tighter head and shoulders crop might be just as effective, and de-emphasize some of the background elements.

4. (did I say 3 things?) the pillar in the background is a tad crooked, you may want to try some straightening.


Grippy 30D, Tokina 300f4, Sigma 18-50f2.8, Canon 70-200f4L, thrifty50mkI, PM7500DX
Jon Gee Photography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bwolford
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,705 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida
     
Jul 12, 2007 18:09 as a reply to  @ dekalbSTEEL's post |  #5

Thanks for your help guys. I did a little better in natural light. (external link) What do you think?


Brice
Gear List
Sample Gallery (external link)http://thewolfords.com​/2007XmasProofs (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,851 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Correcting Casual Wedding Photos
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2889 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.