Does the fact that I didn't get all of the guy on the wall in the shot ruin this?
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' |
Calis Member 176 posts Joined Jan 2004 Location: Wakefield UK More info | Jun 11, 2004 09:05 | #1 Does the fact that I didn't get all of the guy on the wall in the shot ruin this?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightHunter Member 220 posts Joined May 2004 Location: Germany More info | Jun 11, 2004 13:36 | #2 Yes it looks awfull now
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 11, 2004 14:06 | #3 I thought so
LOG IN TO REPLY |
karusel Goldmember 1,452 posts Joined Nov 2003 Location: Location: Location: More info | Jun 11, 2004 14:08 | #4 Sometimes I admire phots where photographers boldly decided to cut something out, and when they did, they did it with reason and thinking. If it's accidental, it is usualy obvious that it's accidental and in such case it bring imperfection to the shot. I say erase the accidental 'flag' out and cut some more of the guy, but not too much. It is an interesting fact, that he is the only black guy in the frame, he's on the edge of it, alone and dressed rather sharp _and_ he is the only disturbing element in the photo. 5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 11, 2004 14:43 | #5 I just couldn't get a nice crop taking more of him out. They all end up cutting through his lunch!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MT Senior Member 453 posts Joined Mar 2004 Location: Missouri, USA More info | Jun 11, 2004 15:04 | #6 1st choice would be with all him (obviously), 2nd with what you have of him and 3rd without him. It seems to lack something (balance?) with him cloned out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
meow Senior Member 330 posts Joined Jul 2003 More info | Jun 11, 2004 15:49 | #7 Definitely. It breaks the bow those guys form. Put him back!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 11, 2004 17:24 | #8 The colour version - to me the red of the building was too dominating hence B&W, the IR look was maily an attept to add drama to the sky.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Jun 11, 2004 19:37 | #9 I like the B&W version. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vfilby Senior Member 728 posts Joined May 2004 Location: Guelph, ON More info | Jun 11, 2004 20:56 | #10 I definately prefer the B&W version. Thanks for letting us know how you achieved the effect. Glass and plastic
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sendide Senior Member 305 posts Joined Jan 2004 More info | Jun 12, 2004 01:58 | #11 Very impressive calis, B&W as said is way better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 12, 2004 03:20 | #12 I used Photoshop CS (but the commands are the same in PS7.0)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sendide Senior Member 305 posts Joined Jan 2004 More info | Jun 12, 2004 08:51 | #13 Just perfect,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Big_B Cream of the Crop Honorary Moderator 4,586 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2004 Location: London, UK More info | Jun 12, 2004 09:37 | #14 Much better in BW. Keep the guy in (half of him anyway!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 2101 guests, 95 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||