Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 13 Jun 2004 (Sunday) 08:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 100-400 IS L vs 300 F4 + 1.4X Test Results

 
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Jun 13, 2004 08:15 |  #1

I spent the day yesterday using a Canon 300 F4 + 1.4X Extender II with my 1D Mark II shooting my RC Flying pictures. I had been using the 100-400 IS L but I wanted faster focus. The 100-400 tends to hunt in less then perfect light. I was very disapppointed. The 300 f4 +1.4x combination focused faster, but was markedly inferior in image quality. The pictures were grainier, less sharp, had less contrast, tolerated USM poorly. It's going back to B&H toady. The pictures will be up at my site later today.
Regards,
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Jun 13, 2004 08:24 |  #2

Scott:
That's been my general experience with TCs regardless of which lens you put them on. I have the 300 f/4 and love it, but only at 300mm. It's as sharp as the 400 f/5.6 plus it has IS.

If you use a TC with the 300 f/4, you lose one full f-stop anyway, so you're right where you'd be with the 100-400.

I look forward to seeing more of your RC shots.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rickyd
Member
79 posts
Joined Jan 2003
     
Jun 13, 2004 08:49 |  #3

Scott,

So will you return to using your 100-400L after this failed attempt to find something better?

I use a 70-200L now with a 1.4 extender with good results on auto racing and motocross. But now with my MK-2 and the lower crop factor I need longer glass!! I really dont care for the push pull design on the 100-400L so Ive avoided it so far. What are you going to try next? I would appreciate any recommendations.

Rick




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Jun 13, 2004 09:17 |  #4

These are some of the pictures from the 300mm + 1.4X combination.
http://www.pbase.com …rgerphoto/rc_fl​ying_61104 (external link)
If you compare them to the previous RC Flying pictures they are inferior.
http://www.pbase.com …rgerphoto/rc_fl​ying_52904 (external link)

I plan on keeping the 100-400 IS L. It is a wonderful lens. It gives me portabilty, IS, and hand held shooting. It only suffers in low light, low contrast focusing. That's better then poor quality images. I have no use for a 300mm prime lens as the 100-400 is tack sharp at 300mm. I'll take a look at the 400mm f5.6

Regards,
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LazyPhotographer
Goldmember
Avatar
3,163 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Jun 13, 2004 11:13 |  #5

Just curious here..... using the TC is a manual focus job, right? Have you checked your diopter adjustment to make sure that it's set the best for your eyes?

I'm only asking because I had a horrible time, for ages, trying to use do any manual focus. I never got a sharp picture - I was tempted to return the camera even. I finally got the diopter tweaked just right and was able to get a better focused picture.

I know that any TC will degrade the picture, but some people get tack sharp images out of them. So there must be something they're doing..


LazyPhotographer: One who uses a telephoto lens to shoot pictures out the car window or from a balcony. :arrow: No Bird Posts Left Behind, dammit! :twisted:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Jun 13, 2004 11:24 |  #6

LazyPhotographer wrote:
Just curious here..... using the TC is a manual focus job, right?

Not on an MKII.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Jun 13, 2004 11:27 |  #7

Scott: Photos were grainier?? I find that odd. I don't think the 400 f/5.6 is going to help your dilemma. You'd have to move to the massively expensive f/2.8 series lenses.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Jun 13, 2004 11:34 |  #8

Scott:
The average person would be pretty happy with those shots, but you're not average. And you're right---they're not as good as your earlier efforts with the 100-400.

As I said earlier, I've had generally poor results with the TCs, regardless of which lens I use them on. The 300 f/4.0 is obvously not the hot setup for your application, but it's a great lens in the right situation.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 13, 2004 11:57 |  #9

.. the 400mm f/5.6 will

1: Illiminate the need for the 1.4X T-C... this giving superior image quality

2: It will give you even faster AF than the 300mm f/4 on it's own. :)

Might be worth a try IMHO...

P.S. the 300mm f/4 and a 1.4X T-con will AF on a 10D and Drebele as well...


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Jun 13, 2004 13:34 |  #10

I finally looked at the photos -- missed the links the first time around -- and what looks weird and grainy is the bokeh. The bokeh looks funky. However, the subject looks very acceptable to me.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Jun 13, 2004 15:28 |  #11

Thanks all for looking. The pictures might be acceptable, but I was looking for something better then the 100-400 and they are clearly not better. In addition, since I'm selling the pictures, I can't afford to have people ask about the grainyness. Heck some people see it when it's not even there. I went to B&H today, about an hour by subway, and returned the 300 F4 and bought the Arthur Morris Bird Lens, the 400 f 5.6. I'll let you know how it goes. There is a Large Scale RC Flying Competition next saturday.
Regards,
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Jun 13, 2004 20:03 |  #12

Scott: I just ordered the 400 for this weekend's ChampCar shoot. I'll let you (all) know how it goes.


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,974 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Canon 100-400 IS L vs 300 F4 + 1.4X Test Results
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1699 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.