Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 13 Jun 2004 (Sunday) 16:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Bathing robin

 
RoB_m
Senior Member
Avatar
357 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Jun 15, 2004 20:15 |  #16

maderito wrote:
Very nice work Rob_m. You've got a future there. :P

those are more than two years old now that i think about it. but thanks :p


not all who wander are lost.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shniks
Goldmember
Avatar
1,041 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 16, 2004 05:39 |  #17

Personally, I think if a picture is sharp, well exposed, with good contrast as well as artistic and creative, then it gets my vote. Why not aim for both? I can admire a picture that is one or the other, but it needs to be very strong in either respect to make an impression on me. Think about it this way - how many times have you looked at a picture that is sharp and clear, but predictable and unemotional? How boring is that? Would you bother to comment on its technical side?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ikinaa
Goldmember
Avatar
1,517 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Luxembourg
     
Jun 16, 2004 05:59 |  #18

I'm not much of an art guy, so that's why I'm more on the technical side and I prefer a technically good picture to a so-called art picture.

Your picture of the robin is IMO not good.
Even if you tried to make something out of it using PS.
Your picture looks like a too-far-away subject through some leaves digitally zoomed. Besides that the subject (the robin) raises no interest in this picture because he's shot from behind in the moment of leaving.
So for me it's definitely not a keeper.

As for the second, I like it overall, subject is nice, except for the leaves which have no texture. You said they were blown out, ok, bad luck. but you did work on the rest you picture, why not on the leaves, why not have added some texture on them?

Anyway how do you know how to critique correctly?
Did we not critique correctly because the majority of us did not like what you did?
Art is very subjective


www.ikinaa.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick ­ barclay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
     
Jun 16, 2004 10:19 |  #19

Welllllllll. I asked for it. And I sure got it. LOL.

I'll concede the point to Jemmind. I'm so insecure in what I post here that I get a little frustrated sometimes. I like to post my pictures. I like to
read people's impressions. The fact that some people think the pictures
have merit, while other think they suck is enlightening. If I have to stir
the pot a little in order to get a response...? Well, as I said, I got it, and
I'm happy with it, because when people offer a critique of something, they
also leave themselves open to some form of critical evaluation by others in terms of their offered opinion. To me it makes for interesting reading,
psychology.

Thanks again for all your opinions. Keep em coming.

And, yeah, Rob_m does really nice work. My birds are merely the product
of accident and incompetence. If, as I've been told, such work belongs
in the Shared Images section (other might have a different suggestin, too), then I guess I should buslte over there to take a look.


You are cordially invited... (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick ­ barclay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
     
Jun 16, 2004 10:54 |  #20

shniks wrote:
Personally, I think if a picture is sharp, well exposed, with good contrast as well as artistic and creative, then it gets my vote. Why not aim for both? I can admire a picture that is one or the other, but it needs to be very strong in either respect to make an impression on me. Think about it this way - how many times have you looked at a picture that is sharp and clear, but predictable and unemotional? How boring is that? Would you bother to comment on its technical side?

Good! But my problem is that every photo can't be tack sharp, or well
exposed, or contrasty, yet still can impress some as art, accidental or otherwise. I've looked and commented on several technically good but
boring (to me) photos. Others have, too. That's one purpose of this category. And there are many I just don't care to comment on. True.
Nobody here can or is expected to comment on every single entry. That's
pure insanity.

But anyway, I wish I had visited the Shared Images section before starting this thread. I could have posted my birds over there and saved
us all a lot of calloused fingertips.


You are cordially invited... (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clos
Member
187 posts
Joined May 2003
     
Jun 16, 2004 11:17 |  #21

Art or Photgraphy?

Guess what gentleman Photography is an ART form/medium. I was kind of taken back by a few comments made here. Maybe it's just semantics I'm not sure. But we are all working to create photographs that evoke a feeling or response from the viewer and thus communicate something through our work. Well, that's Art.

We follow the same rules taught in any Art class. Positive space, negative space, focal point (where your eye starts on a canvas), subject matter, balance, perspective etc.

There are many Genres of Art Impressionism, realistic, abstract, surreal etc. Just as in photography so this string has me confused.

Photography is an Art. Grant it there is a lot of bad Art out there but nonetheless.

-Clos




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick ­ barclay
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
733 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2004
     
Jun 16, 2004 11:24 |  #22

The problem is, clos, photography is both art and technique. The
Critique forum generally looks at a photo for its technical asapects,
while the Shared Photos section allows as much artfulness as you want to put into your picture. I realize that now. They are treated separately here,
which is good. If you want free form art, check out the Shared Photos. If
you like technical art where where the emphasis is on the "Rules of
Good Picture Taking," then Critique Corner is the place to post.


You are cordially invited... (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,919 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Bathing robin
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1807 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.