Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 14 Jun 2004 (Monday) 09:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Used Oil

 
BlueDog
Member
85 posts
Joined Apr 2004
     
Jun 14, 2004 09:28 |  #1

Shot these over the weekend. Right now both photos are untouched. Trying to decide which composition is better.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Shutter Speed: 1/100 sec
F-Stop: f/5.6
Aperature Value: f/5.6
Max Aperature Value: f/3.5
ISO Speed Ratings: 100
Focal length: 22.0 mm

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Shutter Speed: 1/100 sec
F-Stop: f/5.6
Aperature Value: f/5.6
Max Aperature Value: f/4.0
ISO Speed Ratings: 100
Focal length: 28.0 mm



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Calis
Member
Avatar
176 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Wakefield UK
     
Jun 14, 2004 10:06 |  #2

I have to say that neither really does that much for me, but of the 2 I prefer the first.


Phil
www.pbase.com/calis (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
roanjohn
Goldmember
Avatar
3,805 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
     
Jun 14, 2004 10:30 |  #3

Its good.

It doens't jump out at me where I can say "WOW".!!!

But I like them both.

I would probably prefer a better subject............eit​her a bird or a person with that tank. Or maybe a wider POV where I can see more sorroundings.

Ro1




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlueDog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
85 posts
Joined Apr 2004
     
Jun 14, 2004 11:25 |  #4

you both are right. just needs .... something. I know the owner of the barn. He's got a local gravel hauling business and stores his dumptruck in the barn. Having him leaning on the tank might be interesting. I might also play with converting it to B&W. Thanks for the feedback!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Location: Location:
     
Jun 14, 2004 14:44 |  #5

Calis wrote:
I have to say that neither really does that much for me, but of the 2 I prefer the first.

Seconded.

Bluedog: I know exacly how you have felt when you decided to take the shots. Unfortunately many times the framed view looks much duller than what you see with your naked eyes. This is almost on 'the boring postcards' level (discussed in at least two topics), but I'm afraid it's not boring enough :lol: It is specially hard to make a good shot in abandoned places, like warehouses, buildings, ruins, etc. I would say it's either an ultra wide angle lens, or a closeup thing. When shooting stuff like that you really need to 'think framed'.


5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stopbath
Goldmember
1,537 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2003
     
Jun 14, 2004 14:48 |  #6

The close up is too close. Since you can return to the scene, try a shot between the two, one where we see the complete 'face' of the container, but no sky, and maybe no coiled up hose.

Try for side lighting so the boards in the barn show up with more texture. (if that lighting ever happens...)

Also, a bit of movement in the grasses (1/4 second or a full second on a tripod) might show time passing...

I don't think a figure in the image would do anything but draw attention away from the drum...

Very good subject...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RoB_m
Senior Member
Avatar
357 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Jun 14, 2004 15:21 |  #7

it's got good color relationships going on, but yeah, a nice touch would be having a bird or something in there to make it seem more like a moment frozen in time instead of just a barn and whatnot. something natural that you can't just photograph there everyday but evokes an emotional response.


not all who wander are lost.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,648 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Used Oil
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1807 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.