Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 14 Jun 2004 (Monday) 13:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Ant Farming

 
malum
Senior Member
Avatar
609 posts
Joined Jul 2002
Location: UK
     
Jun 14, 2004 13:44 |  #1

Comments on this please?
Good,? Bad? Ugly?

TIA

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



Image description
Artist
Copyright
Exposure time 0.0125 s
F-number f/8
Exposure program Manual
ISO speed ratings 200
Date/time original 13/06/2004 11:18:13
Date/time digitized 13/06/2004 11:18:13
Component config Y
Compressed BPP 2
Shutter speed value 1/79 s
Aperture value 6.000000
Brightness value 6.52
Exposure bias value 0.000000
Max. aperture value 3.000000
Metering mode Pattern
Light source Unknown
Flash Flash did not fire [off]
Focal length 7.8 mm
Colorspace sRGB
Pixel X dimension 2136
Pixel Y dimension 2848
Focal plane X res. 3742.000000
Focal plane Y res. 3742.000000
Sensing method One-chip color area sensor
Scene type Photographed image
Custom Rendered Normal process
Exposure mode Manual exposure
White balance Manual white balance
Scene capture type Standard
Sharpness Soft
Subject distance range Macro
Miscellaneous
Exif version 2.2
FlashPix version (30,31,30,30)
File source DSC
Fujifilm Maker Notes
Quality NORMAL
Sharpness Soft
White balance Auto
Color Normal
Flash mode Off
Flash strength -0.6
Macro On
Focus mode Auto focus
Slow sync Off
Picture mode Manual exposure
Bracketting Off
Blur warning No blur warning
Focus warning Auto focus good
Auto exposure warning Auto exposure good



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RoB_m
Senior Member
Avatar
357 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Jun 14, 2004 13:50 |  #2

it could be a little more sharp but it's still interesting. are the ants attacking the aphids?


not all who wander are lost.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
malum
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
609 posts
Joined Jul 2002
Location: UK
     
Jun 14, 2004 13:55 |  #3

they farm them, it's a symbiotic relationship.
Would the lack of sharpness be a product of no tripod and relatively low shutter speed or limitations of the camera (Fuji S7000, 50% of picture cropped out) or a combination of both?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RoB_m
Senior Member
Avatar
357 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Jun 14, 2004 14:21 |  #4

i'd try using a faster shutter speed first to keep your mobility. a tripod would make things more complicated when trying to set up for a shot like that. it could also be a limitation of your lens. you might have been too close for it to handle. i'm just thinking of possibilities since i don't know which camera you're using. how close were you to the ants?

one of the things listed under the picture is 'sharpness soft'. i'd turn that off if it's a camera setting.


not all who wander are lost.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Location: Location:
     
Jun 14, 2004 14:35 |  #5

Perspective is a little odd, but not necessarily a wrong thing, however the ant farming is pretty subtle, as their 'cows' are in a shadow and one can't really see them well. The shot is underexposed. You should have used ISO 400 and 1/90, you'd certainly blow the already blown highlights in the background but that would not matter much.


5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stopbath
Goldmember
1,537 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2003
     
Jun 14, 2004 14:36 |  #6

A view of the 'farm' is almost profile, a view where we see more of the farm might be nice instead of the side view of it. Also a white card or fill flash could have filled in the darkness...

The aphid farm is really a cool subject.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
malum
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
609 posts
Joined Jul 2002
Location: UK
     
Jun 14, 2004 14:59 |  #7

Thanks all

I will give it another go. This one was almost by accident I just grabbed a quick shot when I noticed it. The result was more interesting than I thought it was going to be.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,277 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Ant Farming
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1807 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.