I'm talking about a vacuum hose that fits over the lens hole. Would that ruin the mirror even if you didn't touch it? Suck unwanted dust into the viewfinder area and make it worse? Will it work great? Is this a dumb question?
segasaturn Senior Member 849 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii More info | Jul 17, 2007 12:24 | #1 I'm talking about a vacuum hose that fits over the lens hole. Would that ruin the mirror even if you didn't touch it? Suck unwanted dust into the viewfinder area and make it worse? Will it work great? Is this a dumb question?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevin_c Cream of the Crop 5,745 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Devon, England More info | Jul 17, 2007 12:29 | #2 It may suck the mirror out!! -- K e v i n --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pekka El General Moderator More info | Jul 17, 2007 12:35 | #3 No, don't do it, ever. Vacuum makes the dust particles fly back and forth with high speed and will definitely spread the dust deeper, scratching the internals before suction damages the mirror box and shutter blades... The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,729 posts Likes: 4064 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Jul 17, 2007 12:51 | #4 While I don't think that the dust flying around will do damage any more than a bulb blower causing all the dust to fly around unless its something more like sand or metal chips, placing the vacuum over the whole lens opening restricts air from getting into the body to replace the air the vacuum is sucking out. Air is going to infiltrate from other locations such as the CF card slot, battery door, and any crack in the seams of the camera. What’s more if you were to only vacuum the camera body while the shutter is closed, you could cause the shutter blades to bend as there could be a significant pressure differential between the camera body and the cavity behind the shutter. Lastly, while the mirror is pretty solid and I doubt that you could vacuum it up, the focus screen is not and you might vacuum it. I’d stay away from a vacuum. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 17, 2007 13:23 | #5 Bad idea! Canon 80D, 60D, Canon 10-22EFs, 15-85EFS IS, Sigma 100-400, Sigma 135/1.8ART, Sigma 30mm f/1.4DC, Canon 60mm EFs Macro, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, 550EX flash, Olympus TG6 underwater P&S
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rava Hatchling 8 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: UK More info | Probably not a bad idea at all really, if it was held say at about 2ins from the lens hole - a sort of mild sucking involved here.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 17, 2007 15:00 | #7 Yep...... a ShopVac works great at removing all those pesky moving things in there.... like mirrors & such. Tim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Jul 17, 2007 15:14 | #8 I used my Kirby Ultimate G once to clean my sensor. However, the Kirby has a method of attaching the hose to the output instead of to the input, allowing it to expel air at a rapid rate (in the 100's of cfm's, seems to ring a bell). Now...being that it was a new lexan hose, and the filter was a hepa micron magic filter, I knew the air would be clean. I worked for the company, and knew how they operated. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elader Goldmember 2,374 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Maryland More info | Jul 17, 2007 15:37 | #9 A swiffer mop works for me. Eric
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Brianbar Senior Member 397 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: Canada More info | Jul 17, 2007 16:08 | #10 Never tried it, but maybe if your very careful I think it may work, the attached link claims they are okay .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aladyforty Goldmember 4,355 posts Gallery: 398 photos Best ofs: 5 Likes: 7462 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Albany: Western Australia More info | Jul 17, 2007 19:20 | #11 NOOOOOO FUJI XT5 + XT3 & a bunch of Fuji lenses, Mavic Air2 drone
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SWPhotoImaging Goldmember 3,231 posts Joined Nov 2003 Location: No. Calif. More info | Jul 17, 2007 22:18 | #12 The last Sunday of every month, I take my bodies and lenses down to the coin-op car wash and vacuum them and spray wash them real good . . . . SWPhoto-Imaging
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Jul 17, 2007 22:30 | #13 I read using lenspens did the trick. Although, I could be wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JWright Planes, trains and ham radio... 18,399 posts Likes: 35 Joined Dec 2004 More info | I saw this advertised in the latest issue of Outdoor Photographer magazine... John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Helrain Member 170 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Sweden More info | Jul 18, 2007 01:01 | #15 It all just sounds like a bad idea to me....the only dust that the vacuum would remove is the same dust that would get removed by a 'blower' providing you held the camera upside-down. Location: Sweden
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 916 guests, 145 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||