Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 15 Jun 2004 (Tuesday) 22:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New model - what's wrong?

 
clos
Member
187 posts
Joined May 2003
     
Jun 15, 2004 22:17 |  #1

I love this one, but something is missing.

I am shooting this again. Any suggestions?

I'm all ears.

-Clos

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


I know the compression is messed up when I resized it.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
advdesigns
Member
44 posts
Joined Apr 2004
     
Jun 16, 2004 03:09 |  #2

I would've scooted her but to the right and had her arch more. This will give more curves to the shot.

Were you using any filters or did you apply vaseline? it looks to have a bit of a glow to it. The colors look great.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bruce ­ Hamilton
Goldmember
1,404 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 16, 2004 07:12 |  #3

clos wrote:
I am shooting this again. Any suggestions?

Ditch the bikini. ;) :lol:


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
187 posts
Joined May 2003
     
Jun 16, 2004 11:59 |  #4

No vaseline, filter.

I really need your help guys I shoot again next week both with a diferent model and the same one.

Other comments welcome as well.

-Clos




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dphoto
Senior Member
Avatar
294 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
     
Jun 16, 2004 12:15 |  #5

Hello Clos,

For me, I think the composition is the problem. I would try adding more of the table into the shot. As it is now, it's not enough to add anything to the shot, but enough to be distracting. (You could alternatively show less of the table.) Also, the model's face and head look disproportionately small to the rest of her body to me. Maybe that's because the way her shoulders are shrugged blocks the side of her neck, or maybe it's the pose itself only showing half of her face. I would try to shoot more of her face if possible. On the plus side, you have a beautiful model and a beautiful exposure in terms of color and sharpness. You did a great job of keeping a proper exposure, i.e. sky not overexposed and model not underexposed.

Good luck on your next shoot!
-Deva




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slejhamer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,758 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2002
     
Jun 16, 2004 12:52 |  #6

dphoto wrote:
Also, the model's face and head look disproportionately small to the rest of her body to me.

This is a good observation. The low shooting angle seems to accentuate the size of her legs while minimizing her shoulders and head. Similar to the "converging parallels" effect one gets when shooting a building with the camera angled up.


Mitch

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Location: Location:
     
Jun 16, 2004 14:37 |  #7

Agreed. She doesn't look gracefully slim this way...

What if you'd make her put her right leg a little lower and her left a little higher, so there would be a window made between knees.

And, yeah, ditch the bikini!! :mrgreen: Or make her wear a single colored one, perhaps white would be best.


5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JZaun
Goldmember
2,488 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
Jun 16, 2004 16:42 |  #8

I am not great at this but I keep seeing all that blue sky. It draws me away from the subject

JZ




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigRed450
Senior Member
Avatar
635 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2003
Location: South Gillies, Ontario, Can
     
Jun 16, 2004 20:31 |  #9

I see by your EXIF data that your Focal Length was at 42.0mm (35mm equiv on 10D = 67mm), that is part of the problem. For best results when shooting women use nothing less then 50mm on a 10D (35mm equivalent = 80mm). This will keep your proportions more natural. The low angle really doesn't help you out here either as it compounds your proportional issues. Try to shoot at eye level. IMHO I think a different angle altogether would be better with this model ( hard to tell what her figure is really like by this image). You need a pose that is flattering, profiles seldom are, so on your next shoot look carefully through the view finder and move around the model to find her special angle...


Jeff
CANON * EOS 1D MKIV * EOS 1D MKII *
* 100-400L IS, 300 f4L IS, 70-200 f2.8L IS, 24-70 f2.8L, 50 1.8 and alot of other gear.

JT Photographics (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Timbits
Member
68 posts
Joined Apr 2004
     
Jun 16, 2004 23:32 |  #10

I"d say she needs to be on the right side of the table facing left.


Canon Eos Rebel-D / 40D
50mm f1.8 / 18-55mm f3.5-5 / 70-200mm f/4.0L USM / 75-300mm f4-5.6
and I don't know why but I now have a Speedlite 580EX.
[/CENTER]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jun 17, 2004 22:07 |  #11

I see by your EXIF data that your Focal Length was at 42.0mm (35mm equiv on 10D = 67mm), that is part of the problem. For best results when shooting women use nothing less then 50mm on a 10D (35mm equivalent = 80mm). This will keep your proportions more natural. The low angle really doesn't help you out here either as it compounds your proportional issues. Try to shoot at eye level. IMHO I think a different angle altogether would be better with this model ( hard to tell what her figure is really like by this image). You need a pose that is flattering, profiles seldom are, so on your next shoot look carefully through the view finder and move around the model to find her special angle...

Good advice, Jeff.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,006 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
New model - what's wrong?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1754 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.