Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Jul 2007 (Thursday) 21:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Any (PC) CS3 or lightroom user?

 
Lorem
Senior Member
Avatar
367 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Jul 19, 2007 21:22 |  #1

I just recently bought a dell with Dual Quad-Core XP 64-bit with 8GB of ram. I'm a little upset that my CS3 only alow (via preference) me to use up to 4G and lighroom barely go over 1GB of memory usage. What's up with that!?

On top of that my processor (multi-core) barely get pegged to 90% or higher. I'm talking serious files here 24GB raw in lightroom and intensive conversion like RGB to CYMK in photoshop. Seem like these 32bit app only recognize one of the core. Oh snap!


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryleung
Senior Member
Avatar
397 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Paradise, Canada
     
Jul 19, 2007 21:37 |  #2

Being a 32-bit app, I think PS CS3 is unable to break the 4GB barrier. Not sure why LR would only use a littel over 1GB though.

Also, I am not sure how well XP 64-bit works. I was always under the impression that XP 64-bit is the orphan child that nobody wanted. If you are going 64-bits, why don't you go directly to Vista 64-bit, since that was designed from the ground up to provide native 64-bit functionality?

-Lik




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lorem
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
367 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Jul 19, 2007 22:48 |  #3

ryleung wrote in post #3577336 (external link)
Being a 32-bit app, I think PS CS3 is unable to break the 4GB barrier. Not sure why LR would only use a littel over 1GB though.

Also, I am not sure how well XP 64-bit works. I was always under the impression that XP 64-bit is the orphan child that nobody wanted. If you are going 64-bits, why don't you go directly to Vista 64-bit, since that was designed from the ground up to provide native 64-bit functionality?

-Lik

Thanks Lik, I WILL have to switch to Vista eventually. For now all that eye candy stuff really turns me off when it come to OS.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 20, 2007 04:53 |  #4

Software can't take advantage of all the hardware, as software gets better it'll get more fully used. Sometimes the CPU's waiting for data from RAM, or disk, or waiting to write data, or there's just general latency and inefficiency inside computers.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mat ­ Fitzsimmons
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Wagga, Australia
     
Jul 20, 2007 05:12 |  #5

Lorem wrote in post #3577263 (external link)
I just recently bought a dell with Dual Quad-Core XP 64-bit with 8GB of ram. I'm a little upset that my CS3 only alow (via preference) me to use up to 4G and lighroom barely go over 1GB of memory usage. What's up with that!?

Hi Lorem,

This link might shed some light:
http://prodig.org …m-can-photoshop-cs3-cope/ (external link)

Essentially, your RAM above 4GB can be used as scratch space (instead of using a HDD), but it appears that CS3 can't directly address it (being a 32-bit app).


Cheers,
Mat.


Mat Fitzsimmons
Canon 5D, other Canon stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mat ­ Fitzsimmons
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Wagga, Australia
     
Jul 20, 2007 05:17 as a reply to  @ Mat Fitzsimmons's post |  #6

Also - Lightroom uses all 4 cores of my quad-core machine (running Vista 64-bit) when processing RAWs to JPG (for example):

IMAGE: http://www.psychogoat.com/linked/LR_quad-small.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.psychogoat.​com/linked/LR_quad.jpg  (external link)

It never seems to use a whole lot of RAM though (however, I don't do lots of edits in it, so perhaps that's why - it's not holding lots of history?)
Not sure why yours would only be using one core ... though I've never used XP 64-bit, sorry.

Cheers,
Mat.

Mat Fitzsimmons
Canon 5D, other Canon stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lorem
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
367 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Jul 20, 2007 09:15 |  #7

Mat Fitzsimmons wrote in post #3578924 (external link)
Also - Lightroom uses all 4 cores of my quad-core machine (running Vista 64-bit) when processing RAWs to JPG (for example):

It never seems to use a whole lot of RAM though (however, I don't do lots of edits in it, so perhaps that's why - it's not holding lots of history?)
Not sure why yours would only be using one core ... though I've never used XP 64-bit, sorry.

Cheers,
Mat.

Mat thanks so much for sharing your settings. I think upgrading to Vista-64 is a no brainer now. Do you know if vista ultimate contain the 64bit version in the same packaging? Everytime look to buy Vista they only talk about the 4flavors (basic, home, business, ultimate) but never mention anything about 64-bit version.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mat ­ Fitzsimmons
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Wagga, Australia
     
Jul 20, 2007 09:23 |  #8

Hi Lorem,

The retail version of Vista Ultimate certainly does come with both 32-bit and 64-bit media in the box (that's what I bought), not sure about the other flavours of Vista - I think they normally include only the 32-bit version in the box, but you can send away to Microsoft for 64-bit media for some of them for a minimal extra cost.

I'm honestly not sure if that's the problem with your system though, I would have thought that Lightroom running under XP 64-bit should still have used all 4 cores??
Very strange indeed.


Cheers,
Mat.


Mat Fitzsimmons
Canon 5D, other Canon stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lorem
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
367 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Jul 20, 2007 09:28 |  #9

Mat Fitzsimmons wrote in post #3579856 (external link)
Hi Lorem,

The retail version of Vista Ultimate certainly does come with both 32-bit and 64-bit media in the box (that's what I bought), not sure about the other flavours of Vista - I think they normally include only the 32-bit version in the box, but you can send away to Microsoft for 64-bit media for some of them for a minimal extra cost.

I'm honestly not sure if that's the problem with your system though, I would have thought that Lightroom running under XP 64-bit should still have used all 4 cores??
Very strange indeed.

Cheers,
Mat.

I'll have to take a closer look at it. Saw your canon setup. Very good choice on lens accessories etc. ;)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryleung
Senior Member
Avatar
397 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Paradise, Canada
     
Jul 20, 2007 13:09 |  #10

Hey Lorem,

When all the stuff I read, I was lead to believe that all OEM Vista installations are only 32-bit, while the retail versions of Vista contains both the 32- and 64-bit OS. However, the articles didn't mention whether all the different retails versions of Vista comes in both 32- and 64-bit flavours. As Mat was saying, the retail version of Vista Ultimate definitely comes with both OS'es.

I still believe that the 64-bit XP is somewhat crippled, and that might be the reason why you can't put all your cores and resources through its pace. Also, don't forget to apply all hardware and software drivers and patches. A long time ago when I was still using an Anthlon 800MHz on an Asus A7V133, the hard disk wouldn't transfer data at UDMA speeds until I've installed some motherboard patches.

-Lik




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,353 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Any (PC) CS3 or lightroom user?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2852 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.