Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 21 Jul 2007 (Saturday) 05:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Looking for clues ...

 
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jul 21, 2007 05:42 |  #1

At work (in magazine publishing) I receive images from lots of different photographers, always in jpeg format.

I always request raw photos (unedited, I mean, not "Raw" eg CR2). Most photographers assure me they're not touching the images, but I suspect otherwise.

My question is, what clues can I look for as evidence of retouching? The obvious one is a gappy histogram, but that is usually masked by the jpeg save.

Is there any EXIF data (or similar) that records Photoshop editing?


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zilly
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,086 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: uk
     
Jul 21, 2007 05:54 |  #2

got to ask why do you want unedited ? all the mags i submit to request full editing so they can just slide it into the page layout and be done

i belive exif does record some photoshop data

they do click here for example (external link)


Dom
Follow my adventures on twitter (external link)
Car Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jul 21, 2007 05:56 |  #3

Should have explained a little further ... I'm the enhancer for our magazines, and all the photos are from our organisation's own photographers. They're all lovely people, but hopeless at post processing! It's much easier for me to enhance from raw, than to fix their dodgy editing.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zilly
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,086 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: uk
     
Jul 21, 2007 06:03 |  #4

ahh fair enough look at the link it shows the software used

personaly it might be worth changing protocol so you only accept raw formats just a thought


Dom
Follow my adventures on twitter (external link)
Car Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Jul 21, 2007 06:11 |  #5

I'd love to see Raws as well, but our IT department is never going to accept files of that size! Unless Uncle Rupert springs for much bigger servers!

I've read and re-read the example you supplied, but I can't see what you're referring to. I see no evidence that editing has occurred.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zilly
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,086 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: uk
     
Jul 21, 2007 08:18 |  #6

right look at software in shot one this is a image that has been modified in photoshop

image two has not been modified notice no software information


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Dom
Follow my adventures on twitter (external link)
Car Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Devon, England
     
Jul 21, 2007 13:42 |  #7

I'd have thought that rather than trying to 'catch them out' after the event, it might be better to educate them first into not p*ssing around with the images unless they know what they are doing :-)
I also would have thought that if you need software to tell you they have touched them then they can't be that bad...


-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howzitboy
Goldmember
2,948 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Hawaii
     
Jul 21, 2007 13:47 |  #8

easier way, tell them to give u their cards after the shoot, not the data. then u copy the cards to your computers and give them back. takes only few minutes to download the data.


http://onehourwedding.​blogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,294 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Looking for clues ...
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1063 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.