Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 25 Jul 2007 (Wednesday) 07:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

DPP: RAW tone curve and "Linear"-option

 
C2S
Senior Member
Avatar
303 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oulu, Finland
     
Jul 25, 2007 07:15 |  #1

Hey all. In Digital Photo Professional, right under the tone curve of the RAW-tools page 1, we have an option to either tweak the 9-step slider, or choose the "Linear"-option instead. I've been wondering and trying out this setting recently.

Choosing it makes the image more dim, which I think looks interesting for certain subjects, and you can bring the brightness back to normal levels by using the RGB curve and clipping controls on the next page of the tool palette. The images seem to end up looking fine even if edited this way, just a little different.

A few questions though: the DPP help file didn't explain much of this setting, and mentioned that it is helpful for checking the image for possible problems, so:
-what does it do exactly and how is it different?
-does using this setting degrade the image quality in any way? (it's a RAW-file, so I think it shouldn't)
-is it this setting the best option for this kind of edit or is there any better alternative?

And it seems to me that using the normal tone curve, with any slider setting, clips the shadows/highlights a bit more than when using the linear-option. Well, I'd like to hear you input - I might be using this more in the future.

Thanks for reading. :)


EOS 500D | Sigma 10-20mm EX | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | Sigma 70-300mm macro | Tripod | CPL | 25% GND | 0.2% ND | Canon RC-1 | 430EX Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jul 26, 2007 15:02 |  #2

When you check that Linear box, you are basically telling DPP not to apply any tone curve to it so what you see is exactly what was captured by the sensor (after the Bayer pattern processing, of course, to bring back the colors). If you want to apply your own tone curve to the image, this is the best way to process the raw image, which is basically what you did when you checked that option and then went into the RGB palette and adjusted the tone curve to your liking.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
C2S
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
303 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oulu, Finland
     
Jul 26, 2007 15:37 |  #3

Thanks for your reply, that's pretty much how I saw it too. How about one more thought: previously I had been moving the slider setting all the way left for the least contrast and least blown highlights (and then customizing the curves) - even though it saves the highlights more, the contrast seems to be (at first) much less than with the linear-option. One might think the when the slider is moved to left, the tone curve would become more straight, i.e. more linear-like, but apparently that is not exactly true?

Of course, one of the differences is still the histogram on the next page being more compressed to the shadow side. (although I don't exactly understand the reason for this effect - other than that the setting was supposed to be just a quick checking tool, maybe.)


EOS 500D | Sigma 10-20mm EX | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm f/1.8 II | Sigma 70-300mm macro | Tripod | CPL | 25% GND | 0.2% ND | Canon RC-1 | 430EX Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,938 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
DPP: RAW tone curve and "Linear"-option
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2825 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.