Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 25 Jul 2007 (Wednesday) 10:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

always increasing saturation and contrast

 
notapro
Goldmember
Avatar
2,540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Southwestern Ontario
     
Jul 25, 2007 10:24 |  #1

I am fairly new to DSLR and use a 1D mark II and shoot in JPEG because I don't have a card big enough to make shooting in RAW convenient. I find that I am having to bump the contrast and saturation on every picture.

Is this typical of digital?

Would shooting in RAW help with the problem?

Any other advice on how to get better contrast and saturation out of the camera would be much appreciated as well. Thanks!


Amanda

Ontario Wedding Photographer  (external link)| My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Jul 25, 2007 10:32 |  #2

RAW won't add any saturation or contrast. In fact it will probably decrease it. The in camera JPEG is processed to add saturation, contrast, and sharpness. You could increase the values in the camera's menus.

Also, the lens you use plays a big part in the color and contrast. The better lenses produce better results. I found that when I started shooting with my 70-200 f/4 L compared to my old consumer grade 70-210 that the color and contrast were much better and the result was less processing.

Another thing to consider is to make sure you are working on a calibrated monitor. If your screeen isn't accurate then you may be adding stuff that doesn't need to be added.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canoflan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,059 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Texas, US
     
Jul 25, 2007 10:32 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Did you check the picture style settings in camera? Since you are shooting jpegs, the picture style settings drive the processing of the picture before writing to the card. These may be on the low side of what you prefer your saturation and contrast to be. Bump these up a notch to two above the middle and see what happens. Additionally, take a pic of the settings right now, then after adjusting these settings and post both. Let's see if the proof is in the pudding (camera).
Pat




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Jul 25, 2007 10:37 |  #4

You'll find as you mature as a digital photogrpaher that you'll want RAW control. That being said, as you progress down the road you'll find less and less that you need to bump contrast and saturation.

You'll come to master the camera's personality and you'll master digital exposure as well. Your exposures will be nice and contrasty with good saturation. I recall my first L lens excitment. I shot with it all the time. When I got a 50mm 1.4 I was disapointed with the contrast and saturation. Now I am quite happy with it. My shooting has matured and the lens stayed exactly the same.

Get some L glass down the road, start shooting raw, master exposure and you'll find that the boosting you do now lessens. Plus you get the hang of less is more.

In RAW, I boost contrast never more that +2 and the contrast slider rarely gets worked unless I'm going for an "effect". Micro contrast though is something i use. the "clarity" slider or an unsharp mask of 15,100,0 is always part fo my RAW recipe.

Shoot RAW, take control. Get Lightroom working for you, master exposure and learn to love yummy glass. :)


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jul 25, 2007 22:13 |  #5

I don't have a card big enough to make shooting in RAW convenient.

Before you buy anything else, get another card. Prices are dropping every day.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notapro
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Southwestern Ontario
     
Jul 26, 2007 00:41 |  #6

Thanks everyone for the help. I'm trying to adjust to digital and it is very tempting to fall back on technology in PP, but I really want to learn to make the camera work for me. I foolishly expected that it would be just like film SLR and that I would pick that back up immediately after about 5 years never having touched one. So thank you for being patient with my newbie questions!

In2Photos wrote in post #3608130 (external link)
Another thing to consider is to make sure you are working on a calibrated monitor. If your screeen isn't accurate then you may be adding stuff that doesn't need to be added.

I'm using a laptop right now, and have a heck of a time with it. My husband's monitor for his desktop is going, so I've convinced him to buy a true colour monitor and I can borrow it for pp. However, even after my edits, I get a lot of comments that the photos are lacking contrast, so I'm pretty sure that I need to work on the in-camera stuff... just need to learn how!

canoflan wrote in post #3608131 (external link)
Did you check the picture style settings in camera? Since you are shooting jpegs, the picture style settings drive the processing of the picture before writing to the card. These may be on the low side of what you prefer your saturation and contrast to be. Bump these up a notch to two above the middle and see what happens. Additionally, take a pic of the settings right now, then after adjusting these settings and post both. Let's see if the proof is in the pudding (camera).
Pat

It's set to standard processing. I'm going to try your experiment--battery is dead right now, but will get outside tomorrow and do it. However, I do want to work on learning to use RAW.

cosworth wrote in post #3608157 (external link)
Shoot RAW, take control. Get Lightroom working for you, master exposure and learn to love yummy glass. :)

Right now I'm using an Ultrasonic 28-80 that I got from a photographer friend who told me it was not a great lens, but was all he could part with at the moment. I WISH I could justify buying an L lens, but will probably pick up a couple of Sigmas--I've used Sigma before and was happy with it.

PhotosGuy wrote in post #3611589 (external link)
Before you buy anything else, get another card. Prices are dropping every day.

I will take that advice! Right now I'm using a couple of 256s and even in JPEG, it's only about 45 photos. Fine when just sticking close to home, but no good for a day out.

Thanks again for the advice! Now I at least know what I need to work on!


Amanda

Ontario Wedding Photographer  (external link)| My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 26, 2007 00:46 |  #7

A 1D2N is US$3200. A 4Gb Sandisk Ultra II is $70, or $100 for an Extreme IV. How is it you can't afford a card?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
Avatar
10,939 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
     
Jul 26, 2007 00:52 |  #8

Take that 28-80 off and smash it into the ground. Worst lens ever.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notapro
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Southwestern Ontario
     
Jul 26, 2007 00:52 |  #9

It's not so much that I can't afford it as it is that I live in small town and don't have anywhere to get one without travelling 45 minutes. Haven't had a chance since receiving the camera last week. 2-256s was plenty memory with my last camera. but thanks for your concern regarding my finances.


Amanda

Ontario Wedding Photographer  (external link)| My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notapro
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Southwestern Ontario
     
Jul 26, 2007 00:54 |  #10

re: smashing lens. It's borrowed until I can travel to nearest town with a camera shop (same town with a memory card)... best not to smash it given it's not mine, although as I understand, it doesn't get used anyway.


Amanda

Ontario Wedding Photographer  (external link)| My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ItsMike
Goldmember
Avatar
2,185 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Greenlawn NY
     
Jul 26, 2007 03:34 |  #11

tim wrote in post #3612196 (external link)
A 1D2N is US$3200. A 4Gb Sandisk Ultra II is $70, or $100 for an Extreme IV. How is it you can't afford a card?

My next Comment....

It's not so much that I can't afford it as it is that I live in small town and don't have anywhere to get one without travelling 45 minutes

Tigerdirect.com......


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Derbyshire ­ Weddings
Member
152 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Lichfield, Staffordshire. UK
     
Jul 26, 2007 04:06 as a reply to  @ ItsMike's post |  #12

www.7dayshop.com (external link)

Jersey based supplier, that's Jersey Channel Islands not NY.

So cheap they are almost giving them away!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notapro
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Southwestern Ontario
     
Jul 26, 2007 12:45 |  #13

ItsMike wrote in post #3612705 (external link)
Tigerdirect.com......

Or to save fellow canucks the trouble... Tigerdirect.ca
Thanks for the tip. Awesome prices!

Just checked and Best buy has some of their digital memory on sale right now. Sandisk 8GB Ultra II cf is on for $150.


Amanda

Ontario Wedding Photographer  (external link)| My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BLS439
Senior Member
356 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: 95060
     
Jul 26, 2007 14:03 |  #14

Check out www.newegg.com (external link)

Been using Transcend memory cards for a while now. I bought each of my 4gb cards for less than $65 shipped overnight.

One question I have for you that I didn't see addressed is: Do you notice your contrast/saturation problems on your monitor or only when posting to the net? it may be a problem of not changing your color profile to sRGB rather than a complete post-processing problem.


Dave
Pawlak Photo (external link)
SportsShooter (external link)
Exposure Manager (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
notapro
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Southwestern Ontario
     
Jul 26, 2007 15:22 |  #15

BLS439 wrote in post #3614081 (external link)
Check out www.newegg.com (external link)

Been using Transcend memory cards for a while now. I bought each of my 4gb cards for less than $65 shipped overnight.

One question I have for you that I didn't see addressed is: Do you notice your contrast/saturation problems on your monitor or only when posting to the net? it may be a problem of not changing your color profile to sRGB rather than a complete post-processing problem.

I shoot in sRGB and my working space is set to sRGB, so I don't think that's it. I wish it were. I hadn't attributed much to the lens, so given that I have what is by all accounts a crappy lens, I think that is part of it, plus still working on getting exposures right.


Amanda

Ontario Wedding Photographer  (external link)| My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,593 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
always increasing saturation and contrast
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2556 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.