mopardog wrote in post #4386233
interesting. i got an email back from canon that it would cost $119 + $8 shipping just to send it off.
I took the camera to a local shop who collects a $25 deposit to have the camera evaluated by Canon. If I chose not to have it serviced, I'd lose my $25. If I elect to have it serviced, then they apply the $25 to the cost of service.
...i hate this one (the s2IS). all my pix are very blurry unless they are pretty far away, i can't do closeups and since i have a website and need to photograph products, i am totally frustrated.
Wow, I've never had any issues. I've used mine predominantly for sports photography (with a TC), so most of mine are far away shots at long focal lengths. However, it has had a fair bit of in-home use and I don't have that issue. Maybe you can clarify if by "blurry" you mean "out of focus" on the object of interest, or if you mean everything in the image is motion blurred. One is a focus issue, the other is a camera motion issue. One feature I actually appreciate is that the flash doesn't automatically pop up. However, this could lead to low shutter speed shots which would be motion blurred.
iwhat do you think of the S3IS?
I moved to a Canon 30D and 70-200 F2.8 and TC this season so really haven't shot the S3 at all. I must say, however, that I'm amazed at the shot's I've been able to get with my old S2 and the TC. For the $500 investment, it's an amazing setup. The S3 gives you a few more megapixels, but with that big zoom, I rarely have to crop much. The S3 also has higher ISO (800 I believe), but I haven't seen how usable ISO 800 is. I found ISO 400 on the S2 to be unacceptable in regards to noise, and ISO 200 fairly bad. But given ample light, the S2 rocks, and I suspect the S3 would be just a bit better than the S2.
Dave O