A better bounce card
| POLL: "Your Favorite Diffuser for Canon 580 for Wedding Photography" |
Bare Flash | 4 4.4% |
Bare Flash in a Bracket | 4 4.4% |
Built-in Flip | 6 6.6% |
Flip Card | 16 17.6% |
Gary Fong (Please Describe which one) | 20 22% |
Other (Please Describe) | 41 45.1% |
EdgarG Member 30 posts Joined Mar 2007 More info | Jul 29, 2007 09:32 | #31 A better bounce card
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidW Goldmember 3,165 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Bedfordshire, UK More info | Jul 29, 2007 11:01 | #32 Make this another vote for a Lumiquest Promax System. I'd attach it with a Lumiquest Cinch Strap, and put it on a Newton bracket (I'm using a Di400CR camera rotator for my 20D plus BG-E2 grip).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Jul 29, 2007 11:33 | #33 Titus213 wrote in post #3627465 Serious question - what do you use your grip for? Most equipment like this is personal preference. While I don't consider it essential, I bought it for the same reasons everyone does. Balance (makes it feel more like the 1D thus a relatively seamless switch between the two ergonomics wise), battery life, and the button. With my Newton I can still hold the camera via the grip and make use of the portrait button. The Newton bracket just goes between 2 fingers and under a small portion of my palm, unlike the Strobo and many others that nearly or completely block access to it. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Jul 29, 2007 12:10 | #34 Tareq wrote in post #3628625 I have this modifier, is it any good? http://www.lastolite.com/micro-apollo.php http://www.naturepixel.com …_micro_apollo_boitier.htm I don't know if 'Wescott' is now 'Lastolite', but the Wescott Micro Apollo is a mini softbox made for speedlights. Unlike Photoflex or Lumiquest mini softwboxes which are made of vinly, the Wescott used conventional softbox material over a metal wireframe. I have used that for weddings since the 90's, and prefer this over something like the Lumiquest Promax simply because I put it on my flash and shoot, without bothering to configure anything for 'ceiling, no ceiling?', 'neutral ceiling, tinted colored ceiling?' Just set it up on the flash and concentrate on the photo content, not the mechanics of photo creation! (If I didn't use the mini softbox approach, I probably would go with the Promax.) You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Jul 29, 2007 12:30 | #35 Wilt wrote in post #3630155 I don't know if 'Wescott' is now 'Lastolite', but the Wescott Micro Apollo is a mini softbox made for speedlights. Unlike Photoflex or Lumiquest mini softwboxes which are made of vinly, the Wescott used conventional softbox material over a metal wireframe. I have used that for weddings since the 90's, and prefer this over something like the Lumiquest Promax simply because I put it on my flash and shoot, without bothering to configure anything for 'ceiling, no ceiling?', 'neutral ceiling, tinted colored ceiling?' Just set it up on the flash and concentrate on the photo content, not the mechanics of photo creation! (If I didn't use the mini softbox approach, I probably would go with the Promax.) i bought it long time ago and i used it once but i didn't know what results should i get and i didn't have that weddings or portraits shooting that much to use it, so i left it somewhere in my room, just i asked if it is worthy then i may used it again, i was looking to get lumiquest but i think i had enough access. for flash to try first before get something else. Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 29, 2007 13:53 | #36 Hi Lukas, lukasgunar wrote in post #3628560 Hello Baadil, well I haven't tried Lightsphere so I cannot say that abetterbouncecard is better but I tried abetterbouncecard on my first wedding and it worked pretty well (see some pictures). In regard to look - well if you paint the outer side of the card with black color, it can look just good. From my point, quality of pictures are much more important than look of your equipment. Please check the pictures and decide if it's working fine (beware that I'm just beginner photographer and it was my first wedding and I haven't touched pictures in PS, just in Camera RAW). Canon EOS 400D Xti (Poor man's 1D,) Canon 50mm 1.8 II, Sigma 55-200mm f/4-5.6, Canon 18-55mm Kit; Canon 17-55mm 2.8 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightUser Senior Member 286 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info | Jul 29, 2007 20:28 | #37 Permanent banbieber wrote in post #3623321 I've tended to find that the ceiling works as the best diffuser, if you must have your flash on-camera. It makes for an _enormous_ light source. Only if it is white and not very high.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightUser Senior Member 286 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info | Jul 29, 2007 20:32 | #38 Permanent bancdifoto wrote in post #3624805 Downside to the Cameraflip is that it doesn't work with cameras with grips, or 1 series bodies since the grip is integrated. You can modify it, but IMHO you shouldn't have to. A wee bit more thought on the part of Tiffen and it would be a real nice bracket for anyone. Use a stroboframe flip flash.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sapearl Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 29, 2007 20:33 | #39 The little built in white card, and/or the Lumiquest system, all in conjunction with the Newton camera rotator: GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Jul 29, 2007 20:36 | #40 LightUser wrote in post #3632778 Use a stroboframe flip flash. Been there, done that on the typical flip flash designs. Now I have a Newton. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightUser Senior Member 286 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info | Jul 29, 2007 20:38 | #41 Permanent banlukasgunar wrote in post #3628560 Hello Baadil, well I haven't tried Lightsphere so I cannot say that abetterbouncecard is better but I tried abetterbouncecard on my first wedding and it worked pretty well (see some pictures). In regard to look - well if you paint the outer side of the card with black color, it can look just good. From my point, quality of pictures are much more important than look of your equipment. Please check the pictures and decide if it's working fine (beware that I'm just beginner photographer and it was my first wedding and I haven't touched pictures in PS, just in Camera RAW). . Great shots. What size of better bounce card do you have? The small one or bigger one. Peter said he uses the smaller 3.5 inch one about 95%of the time. I have the demb flipit and it was a disaster at my last wedding. Not using that anymore.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 29, 2007 23:15 | #42 Hi Stuart, sapearl wrote in post #3632784 The little built in white card, and/or the Lumiquest system, all in conjunction with the Newton camera rotator: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=338933 With the bracket positioning the flash top center above the lens, you won't get those shadows behind the people, or they will fall so low that they will typically be out of view. Canon EOS 400D Xti (Poor man's 1D,) Canon 50mm 1.8 II, Sigma 55-200mm f/4-5.6, Canon 18-55mm Kit; Canon 17-55mm 2.8 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Jul 29, 2007 23:24 | #43 Lumiquest ProMax System Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Jul 29, 2007 23:24 | #44 Oh and check out the Newton Camera brackets. Pricey, but really nice. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sapearl Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 30, 2007 05:47 | #45 Rotation - from landscape to portrait ... the flash is ALWAYS at the top no matter how you orient the camera. Study the photos again and you'll see see how it rotates: Baadil wrote in post #3633671 Hi Stuart, If you are bouncing the flash off the top anyway, then what's the benefit of using bracket? Do you get any additional advantage? Thanks. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1819 guests, 100 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||