Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 28 Jul 2007 (Saturday) 12:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is there a right way to turn a picture black and white ?

 
90blackcrx
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jul 28, 2007 12:44 |  #1

Is there a right and a wrong way ?


Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Jul 28, 2007 12:56 |  #2

There is only one wrong way, and that is to simply Desaturate.

There are (at last count) 35,891,218 ± 50,000 right ways to do it. So that means odds are in your favor.

Assuming Photoshop: use the HELP feature and look up "Chanel Mixer" and learn how to work that. Also check here ( http://www.atncentral.​com/download.htm (external link) ) under the "Black and White Conversion" heading. Finally, do the following Google search (everything in the brackets, but not the brackets themselves): [+tutorial +"black and white" +Photoshop].

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90blackcrx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jul 28, 2007 13:03 |  #3

Radtech1 wrote in post #3625581 (external link)
There is only one wrong way, and that is to simply Desaturate.

Why is that wrong though, thats what I did to turn one black and white, thats why I asked.

Was using DPP

Also if I get a picture printed and want black and white, I can simply leave it in color and they will print it in black and white... is that the best way ?


Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Jul 28, 2007 13:08 |  #4

Desaturate gives the flattest possible tone response. ANYTHING is better than that. Look around.

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90blackcrx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jul 28, 2007 13:14 as a reply to  @ Radtech1's post |  #5

Hmm so you just hit monochrome and its black and white ? Right off the bat I noticed the signed looked a lot different turning it black and white in photoshop, rather then doing what you said not to.

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72/90blackcrx/e7158390.jpg

DPP , turning the saturation down
IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72/90blackcrx/79b3299f.jpg

Photoshop, using monochrome
IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72/90blackcrx/52b47677.jpg

Does that last pic look right ?

Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sydor25
Goldmember
Avatar
2,356 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Feb 2005
Location: North Texas
     
Jul 28, 2007 13:56 |  #6

My quick conversion using CS3 (hope you don't mind):

IMAGE: http://sydor25.com/Pictures/e7158390.jpg

1D Mark III, 5D Mark III, EF 17-40 f/4, EF 24-105 f/4 IS, EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS, EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6, EF 24 f/1.4, EF 300 f/4 IS, EF 100 f/2.8 Macro & EF-S 10-22
- James
jt-digital-photography Photo Galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90blackcrx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jul 28, 2007 13:57 as a reply to  @ Sydor25's post |  #7

Care to explain what you did ? I don't think I like the way the channel mixer did the photo I used. My one other question, if I'm getting it printed in black and white, should I even adjust it in photoshop or will the lab do it all ?


Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Jul 28, 2007 14:05 |  #8

90blackcrx wrote in post #3625756 (external link)
Care to explain what you did ? I don't think I like the way the channel mixer did the photo I used. My one other question, if I'm getting it printed in black and white, should I even adjust it in photoshop or will the lab do it all ?

Hard to say what you should do.

For me, I always convert before having them printed. As far as you saying, "I like the way the channel mixer did the photo I used", did you try adjusting the three different sliders up and down (with "Monochrome" checked)? When you do that, you get an almost infinite variety of shadings and emphasis. I am amazed that NONE of them looked good?

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90blackcrx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jul 28, 2007 14:08 |  #9

Radtech1 wrote in post #3625781 (external link)
Hard to say what you should do.

For me, I always convert before having them printed. As far as you saying, "I like the way the channel mixer did the photo I used", did you try adjusting the three different sliders up and down (with "Monochrome" checked)? When you do that, you get an almost infinite variety of shadings and emphasis. I am amazed that NONE of them looked good?

Rad

They looked good but for some reason that pic I did the wrong way, I like. I mean can I achieve that with the channel mixer ? I need to mess with it more though.


Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90blackcrx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jul 28, 2007 14:12 |  #10

Here is one I just did, what I'm not liking is the sign looks to black, what color or setting would I have to mess with to get it lighter.

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72/90blackcrx/bc1a16ea.jpg

Actually after uploading it, I like that. Almost looks like the one guys right before me... what do you think guys ?

Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Jul 28, 2007 14:20 |  #11

I am at work right now (which means no PS in front of me). To adjust the tone of the sign, you would want to move the green slider. I don't remember if "right" or "left" will brighten it or darken it, but it is clearly the green slider.

If that adjust the rest of the picture in a manner you don't like, try this: Duplicate the layer making a total of 2 layers. Turn off the top layer, and working on the bottom layer, adjust it so the sign is the way you like it. Don't worry about the rest of the shot.

When you get the sign perfect, move to the top layer and adjust that so that the rest of the shot is how you like it and don't worry about the sign.

When you get the top layer the way you like it, then use the eraser tool and erase the "bad sign" from the top layer to reveal the good one underneath. Be careful around the edges, or it could look fakey.

When you get that done, just flatten the layers.

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90blackcrx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jul 28, 2007 14:29 |  #12

I figured it was the green, but when I moved that, the back round got really light or dark. Just I guess have to mess with that feature. I do see now though that saturation almost takes the detail away basically.


Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lnterestlng
Senior Member
Avatar
393 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Manhattan
     
Jul 28, 2007 14:56 |  #13

A good way to see what you might want is to look at each channel by itself. Then you will know which to turn up or down in the channel mixer. Just click on each channel in the channels pallette. It's really all personal taste. If you want the sign to look less black then turn the green slider up. and the red down a little. Then to get more black turn down the constant.
Example:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


You can also mask out the bg and use a seperate adjustment layer on it.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90blackcrx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
985 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jul 28, 2007 15:09 as a reply to  @ lnterestlng's post |  #14

What I noticed was when I just desaturated it in DPP, I also toned some of the color down creating the dark sky look. Where in photoshop can I go to tone the colors down ? Where would be the right spot ?

There is not a way to turn a picture in black and white with dpp ? I mean the right way, is desaturation really the wrong way though cause I'm seeing some people suggestions that on google.


Canon 40d
Lens
18-55mm F/3.5-5.6,Nifty 50,17-70 3.2 sigma marco wide angle lens
Accessories
Battery Grip,Hand Grip,Wire and Wireless remote

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lnterestlng
Senior Member
Avatar
393 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Manhattan
     
Jul 28, 2007 18:55 |  #15

It's not "wrong'. You just have no control at all over your tones. Photoshop and it's many avenues just gives you a little more control in order for you to make what your mind sees. Have a look at your Image>Adjustments menu. All your adjustment tools are in there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,165 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Is there a right way to turn a picture black and white ?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2556 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.